References
Bennett, Michael R. [SE]:Some Extensions of a Montague Fragment of English (Ph.D. thesis, UCLA 1974).
Boër, Steven E. [WW]: ‘“Who” and “Whether”: Towards a Theory of Indirect Question Clauses’,Linguistics and Philosophy 2 (1978), 307–345.
Carnap, Rudolf [RSE]: ‘Replies and Systematic Expositions’, in Paul Arthur Schilpp (ed.),The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap (La Salle/III. & London, 1963), pp. 859–1013.
Cresswell, Maxwell J. [LL]:Logics and Languages (London, 1973).
Gallin, Daniel [IML]:Intensional and Higher-Order Modal Logic (Amsterdam, 1975).
Groenendijk, Jeroen and Martin Stokhof [SAW]: ‘Semantic Analysis ofwh-complements’,Linguistics and Philosophy 5 (1982), 175–233.
Karttunen, Lauri [SSQ]: ‘Syntax and Semantics of Questions’,Linguistics and Philosophy 1 (1977), 3–44.
Löbner, Sebastian [IVF]:Intensionale Verben und Funktionalbegriffe (Tübingen, 1979).
Montague, Richard [PTO]: ‘The Proper Treatment of Quantification in Ordinary English’, in Jaakko Himikka, Julius Moravcsik, and Partick Suppes (eds.),Approaches to Natural Language (Dordrecht 1973), pp. 221–242.
Montague, Richard [UG]: ‘Universal Grammar’,Theoria 36 (1970), 373–398.
Partee, Barbara H. [C]: ‘Compositionality’ (Draft), Nijmegen (Max-Planck-Institute of Psycholinguistics, 1983).
Quine, Willard Van Orman [WO]:Word and Object (Cambridge/Mass, 1960).
von Stechow, Arnim and Thomas Ede Zimmermann [TA]: ‘Term-Answers and Contextual Change’, to appear inLinguistics.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zimmermann, T.E. Remarks on Groenendijk and Stokhof's theory of indirect questions. Linguist Philos 8, 431–448 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00637412
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00637412