References
Barwise, J. and R. Cooper: 1981, ‘Generalized Quantifiers in Natural Language’,Linguistics and Philosophy 4, 159–220.
Berman, S.: 1987, ‘A Situation Based Semantics for Adverbs of Quantification’, in J. Blevins and A. Vainikka (eds.),University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 12, GLSA, Amherst.
Berman, S.: 1990, ‘Towards the Semantics of Open sentences: WH-phrases and Indefinites’, in M. Stokhof and L. Torenvliet (eds.),Proceedings of the 7th Amsterdam Colloquium, ITLI, University of Amsterdam.
Carlson, G.: 1977,Reference to Kinds in English, Indiana University Linguistic Club, Bloomington, Indiana. Also published in 1979 by Garland, New York.
Chierchia, G.: 1988, ‘Dynamic Generalized Quantifiers and Donkey Anaphora,’ in M. Krifka (ed.)Genericity in Natural Language, University of Tübingen.
Chierchia, G.: 1990, ‘Intensionality and Context Change’, ms., Cornell University.
Chierchia, G. and M. Rooth: 1984, ‘Configurational Notions in DRT’, in C. Jones and P. Sells (eds.)Proceedings of NELS 14, GLSA, Amherst.
Chomsky, N.: 1965,Aspects of a Theory of Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Chomsky, N.: 1970, ‘Remarks on Nominalization’, in R. Jacobs and P. Rosenbaum (eds.)Readings in English Transformational Grammar, Blaisdell, Waltham, Mass.
Cooper, R.: 1979, ‘The Interpretation of Pronouns’ in F. Heny and H. Schnelle (eds.)Syntax and Semantics 10, Academic Press, New York.
Davidson, D.: 1967, ‘The Logical Form of Action Sentences’, in N. Rescher (ed.),The Logic of Decision and Action, University of Pittsburgh Press.
Dekker, P. (1990a) “The scope of Negation in Discourse” in M. Stokhof, J. Groenendijk and D. Beaver (eds)Quantification and Anaphora I, Dyana Deliverable R2.2A, University of Edinburgh.
Dekker, P. (1990b) “Existential Disclosure”, paper presented at the Third Symposium on Logic and Language, Réfvulop, Hungary. To appear in the proceedings of the conference.
De Hoop, H. and De Swart, H.: 1989, ‘Over Indefiniete Objecten en to Relatie tussen Syntaxis en Semantiek’,Glot 12.
Diesing, M.: 1988, ‘Bare Plural Subjects and the Stage/Individual Contrast’ in M. Krifka (ed.),Genericity in Natural Language, University of Tübingen.
Engdahl, E.: 1986,Constituent Questions, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Evans, G.: 1980, ‘Pronouns’,Linguistic Inquiry,11(2), 337–362.
Gazdar, G.: 1980, ‘A Cross-categorial Semantics for Coordination’,Linguistics and Philosophy 3, 407–409.
Groenendijk, J. and M. Stokhof: 1990, ‘Dynamic Montague Grammar’, in L. Kalman and L. Poles (eds.)Papers from the Second Symposium on Logic and Language, Akademiai Kiado, Budapest.
Groenendijk, J. and M. Stokhof: 1991, ‘Dynamic Predicate Logic’,Linguistics and Philosophy 14, 39–100.
Heim, I.: 1982,The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Published in 1989 by Garland, New York.
Heim, I.: 1990, ‘E-type Pronouns and Donkey Anaphora’,Linguistics and Philosophy 13(2), 137–178.
Kadmon, N.: 1990, ‘Uniqueness’,Linguistics and Philosophy 13(3), 273–24.
Kamp, H.: 1981, ‘A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation’, in J. Gorenendijk, T. Janssen and M. Stokhof (eds.)Formal methods in the Study of Language, Mathematical Centre, Amsterdam.
Karttunen, L.: 1976, ‘Discourse Referents’ in J. McCawley (ed.)Syntax and Semantics 7, Academic Press, New York.
Keenan, E. and L. Faltz: 1985,Boolean Semantics for Natural Language, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Keenan, E. and J. Stavi: 1986, ‘A Semantic Characterization of Natural Language Determiners’,Linguistics and Philosophy 9, 253–26.
Kratzer, A.: 1989a, ‘An Investigation of the Lumps of Thought’,Linguistics and Philosophy 12(5), pp. 607–53.
Kratzer, A.: 1989b, ‘Individual-level vs. Stage-level Predicates’, unpublished manuscript, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Krifka, M.: 1991, ‘A Compositional Semantics for Multiple Focus Constructions’, unpublished manuscript, University of Texas, Austin.
Lahiri, U.: 1991, ‘Quantificational Variability in Embedded Interrogatives’, paper presented at SALT 1, Cornell University.
Lappin, S.: 1989, ‘Donkey Pronouns Unbound’,Theoretical Linguistics 15.
Lewis, D.: 1975, ‘Adverbs of Quantification’, in E. Keenan (ed.)Formal Semantics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
May, R.: 1977,The Grammar of Quantification, Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
Muskens, R.: 1989,Meaning and Partiality, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Neale, S.: 1991,Descriptions, MIT Press, Cambridge Mass.
Partee, B. H. and M. Rooth: 1983, ‘Generalized Conjunction and Type Ambiguity’, in R. Bäuerle, C. Schwartze and A. von Stechow (eds.)Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language, De Gruyter, Berlin.
Parsons, T.: 1991,Events in the Semantics of English, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Pelletier, J. and L. Schubert: 1989, ‘Generically Speaking’, in G. Chierchia, B. H. Partee and R. Turner (eds.),Properties, Types and Meaning, vol 2, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Portner, P.: 1991: ‘Gerunds and Types of Events’, paper presented at SALT 1, Cornell University.
Roberts, C.: 1987,Modal Subordination, Anaphora and Distributivity, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Root, R.: 1986, The Semantics of Anaphora in Discourse, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
Rooth, M.: 1985,Association with Focus, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Rooth, M.: 1987, ‘NP Interpretation in Montague Grammar, File Change Semantics and Situation Semantics’, in P. Gardenförs (ed.),Generalized Quantifiers, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Rooth, M.: 1991, ‘Indefinites, Adverb of Quantification and Focus’; unpublished manuscript, AT&T Bells Labs, Murray Hill, N.J.
Srivastav, V.: 1990a,WH-dependencies in Hindi and the Theory of Grammar; Ph.D. Diss., Cornell University.
Srivastav, V.: 1990b, ‘The Syntax and Semantics of Correlatives’, forthcoming inNatural Language and Linguistic Theory.
Stalnaker, R.: 1979, ‘Assertion’ in P. Cole (ed.),Syntax and Semantics 9 — Pragmatics. Academic Press, New York.
Stump, G.: 1981,Formal Semantics and Pragmatics of Free Adjuncts and Absolutes, Ph.D. Dissertation, Ohio State University. A revised version was published in 1985 by Kluwer with the titleThe Semantic Variability of Absolute Constructions.
van Benthem, J.: 1989, ‘Polyadic Quantifiers’,Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 437–64.
Williams, E.: 1981, ‘Argument Structure and Morphology’,The Linguistic Review,1, 81–114.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This paper evolves from one which was originally presented with the title “Anaphora and Dynamic Logic“ at the 1989 Amsterdam Colloquium on Formal Semantics. Subsequently, it circulated as an ITLI prepublication and various versions of it have also been presented at the University of Edinburgh and at the University of Stuttgart. I am indebted to those audiences as well as to many other people for comments and criticisms. In particular, I am indebted to R. Cooper, P. Dekker, D. Dowty, J. Groenendijk, H. Kamp, N. Kadmon, M. Krifka, F. Landman, M. Rooth, M. Stokhof and two L&P referees. I. Heim's detailed and pointed criticisms were also extremely helpful to me. I know that problems and possibly errors are still likely to be there in spite of so much good advice and they are my fault alone. This research was partially supported by theDyana project (EBRA 3715) and by NSF Grant n. BN55-9007804.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chierchia, G. Anaphora and dynamic binding. Linguist Philos 15, 111–183 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00635805
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00635805