Skip to main content
Log in

Towards a common semantics for english count and mass nouns

  • Published:
Linguistics and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abbott, James C.: 1969,Sets, Lattices, and Boolean Algebras, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akmajian, Adrian and Adrienne Lehrer: 1976, ‘NP-like Quantifiers and the Problem of Determining the Head of an NP’,Linguistic Analysis 2, 395–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Carl Lee: 1978,Introduction to Generative-Transformational Syntax, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bäuerle, Rainer, Christoph Schwarze and Arnim von Stechow (eds.): 1983,Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language, De Gruyter, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, Michael: 1979, ‘Mass Nouns and Mass Terms in Montague Grammar’, in Davis and Mithun (eds.), pp. 263–285. Bunt, Cornelis Hendrik: 1979, ‘Ensembles and the Formal Semantic Properties of Mass Terms’, in Pelletier (ed.), pp. 249–278.

  • Bunt, Cornelis Hendrik: 1981,The Formal Semantics of Mass Terms, dissertation, University of Amsterdam.

  • Bunt, Cornelis Hendrik: 1985,Mass Terms and Model-Theoretical Semantics, Cambridge Studies in Linguistics: vol. 42, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, Greg: 1977a, ‘A Unified Analysis of the English Bare Plural’,Linguistics and Philosophy 1, 413–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, Greg: 1977b,References to Kinds in English, unpublished PhD dissertation, reprinted with revisions as Carlson, 1980, University of Massachusetts.

  • Carlson, Greg: 1980,References to Kinds in English, reprint with revisions of Carlson, 1977b, Garland Publishing, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, Greg, Henry Kyburg and Ron Loui (eds.): 1989,Defeasible Reasoning and Knowledge Representation, Studies in Cognitive Systems: vol. 5, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, Lauri: 1980, Plural Quantification, unpublished manuscript, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, Helen: 1975a, ‘Some Remarks about Mass Nouns and Plurality’,Synthese 31, 395–410, reprinted in Pelletier (ed.), 1979, pp. 15–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, Helen: 1975b, ‘Amounts and Measures of Amounts’,Nods 9, 143–163, reprinted in Pelletier (ed.), 1979, pp. 179–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, C. Y.: 1973, ‘Response to Moravscik’, in Hintikka et al. (eds.), pp. 286–288.

  • Copi, Irving: 1953,Introduction to Logic, 6th ed., 1982, Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H. and E. Clark: 1979, ‘When Nouns Surface as Verbs’,Language,55, 767–811.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culicover, Peter W, Thomas Wasow and Adrian Akmajian (eds.): 1977,Formal Syntax, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Steven and Marianne Mithun (eds.): 1979,Linguistics, Philosophy and Montague Grammar, University of Texas Press, Austin, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Sciullo, Anna Maria and Edwin Williams: 1987,On the Definition of Word, Linguistic Inquiry Monographs, 14, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Gareth: 1977, ‘Pronouns, Quantifiers and Relative Clauses’,Canadian Journal of Philosophy 7, 467–536, 777–797.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Gareth: 1980, ‘Pronouns’,Linguistic Inquiry 11, 337–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, Janet Dean and Ivan Sag: 1982, ‘Referential and Quantificational Indefinites’,Linguistics and Philosophy 5, 335–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Follett, Wilson: 1966,Modern American Usage: A Guide, Hill & Wang, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabbay, Dov and Franz Guenthner (eds.): 1989,Handbook of Philosophical Logic. Volume IV: Topics in the Philosophy of Language, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillon, Brendan S.: 1987, ‘The Readings of Plural Noun Phrases in English’,Linguistics and Philosophy 10, 199–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillon, Brendan S.: 1989, ‘Bare Plurals as Plural Indefinite Noun Phrases’, in Carlson et al. (eds.), pp. 119–166.

  • Gillen, Brendan S.: 1990, ‘Plural Noun phrases and Their Readings: A Reply to Lasersohn’,Linguistics and Philosophy 13, 477–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, Irene, Howard Lasnik and Robert May: 1988, ‘Reciprocity and Plurality’,Linguistic Inquiry 22, 63–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higginbotham, James: 1981, ‘Reciprocal Interpretation’,Linguistic Research 3, 97–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higginbotham, James: 1983, ‘LF, Binding and Nominals’,Linguistic Inquiry 14, 395–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, Jaakko, Julius Moravscik and Patrick Suppes (eds.): 1973,Approaches to Natural Language, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoeksema, Jack: 1983, ‘Plurality and Conjunction’, in ter Meulen (ed.), pp. 63–83.

  • Jackendoff, Ray: 1977, Syntax: A Study of Phrase Structure, Linguistic Inquiry Monograph, 2, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jespersen, Otto: 1909,A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles, 7 vols., Allen and Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jesperson, Otto: 1924,The Philosophy of Grammar, Allen and Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landman, Fred: 1989, ‘Groups I’,Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 559–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landman, Fred: 1989, ‘Groups II’,Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 723–744.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landman, Fred and Frank Veltman (eds.): 1984,Varieties of Formal Semantics, Groningen-Amsterdam Studies in Semantics, n. 3, Foris Publications, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langendoen, D. Terence: 1978, ‘The Logic of Reciprocity’,Linguistic Inquiry 9, 177–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasersohn, Peter: 1990, ‘On the Readings of Plural Noun Phrases’,Linguistic Inquiry 20, 130–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • LePore, Ernie (ed.): 1987,New Directions in Semantics, Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieber, Rochelle: 1992,Deconstructing Morphology: Word Formation in Syntactic Theory The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, Godehard: 1983, ‘The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Terms: A Lattice-theoretic Approach’, in Bäuerle et al. (eds.), pp. 302–323.

  • Link, Godehard: 1984, ‘Hydras. On the Logic of Relative Constructions with Multiple Heads’, in Landman and Veltman (eds.), pp. 245–257.

  • Link, Godehard: forthcoming, ‘Plural’, in van Stechow and Wunderlich (eds.), ch. 9.

  • Lobel, Arnold: 1981,Uncle Elephant, Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lønning, Jan Tore: 1987, ‘Mass Terms and Quantification’.Linguistics and Philosophy 10, 1–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCawley, James D.: 1982, ‘Parentheticals and Discountinuous Constituent Structure’,Linguistic Inquiry 13, 91–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, Terence: 1970, ‘An Analysis of Mass Terms and Amount Terms’,Foundations of Language 6, 362–388, reprinted in Pelletier (ed.), 1979, pp. 137–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelletier, Francis J.: 1974, ‘On Some Proposals for the Semantics of Mass Terms’,Journal of Philosophical Logic 3, 87–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelletier, Francis J.: 1975, ‘Non-Singular Reference: Some Preliminaries’,Philosphia 5, 451–465, reprinted in Pelletier (ed.), 1979, pp. 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelletier, Francis J. (ed.): 1979,Mass Terms: Philosophical Problems, Synthese Language Library, vol. 6, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelletier, Francis J.and Lenhart Schubert: 1987,Three Papers on the Logical Form of Mass Ternes, Generics, Bare Plurals, and Habituals, Technical Report No. TR 87-3, Department of Computing Science.

  • Pelletier, Francis J. and Lenhart Schubert: 1989, ‘Mass Expressions’, in Dov Gabbay and Franz Guenthner (eds.), pp. 327–408.

  • Quine, Willard V.: 1960,Word and Object, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech and Jan Svartik: 1985,A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language, Longmans, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Craige: 1987,Modal subordination, Anaphora, and Distributivity, unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts.

  • Roeper, Peter: 1983, ‘Semantics for Mass Terms with Quantifiers’,Noûs 22, 251–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Bertrand: 1903,The Principles of Mathematics, 2nd ed., 1936, Allen and Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, Lenhart K. and Francis Jeffrey Pelletier: 1987, ‘Problems in the Representation of the Logical form of Generics, Plurals, and Mass Nouns’, in Pelletier and Schubert (eds.), pp. 101–184, also in Ernest LePore (ed.), pp. 387–453.

  • Selkirk, Elisabeth O.: 1977, ‘Some Remarks on Noun Phrase Structure’, in Culicover et al. (eds.), pp. 285–325.

  • Selkirk, Elisabeth O.: 1982,The Syntax of Words, Linguistic Inquiry Monographs, 7, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, Peter M.: 1982a, ‘Number and Manifolds, in Smith (ed.), pp. 160–198.

  • Simons, Peter M.: 1982b, ‘Plural Reference and Set Theory’, in Smith (ed.), pp. 198–260.

  • Simons, Peter: 1987,Parts: A Study in Ontology, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Barry (ed.): 1982,Parts and Moments: Studies in Logic and Formal Ontology, Philosophia (Analytica), Munich.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Stechow, Arnim and Dieter Wunderlich (eds.): 1991,Semantics. An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, De Gruyter, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • ter Meulen, Alice: 1981, ‘An Intensional Logic for Mass Terms’,Philosophical Studies 40, 105–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • ter Meulen, Alice (ed.): 1983,Studies in model Theoretic Semantics, Groningen-Amsterdam Studies in Semantics, n. 1, Foris Publications, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vendler, Zeno: 1967,Linguistics in Philosophy, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Robin J.: 1972,Introduction to Graph Theory, 2nd ed., 1979, Longmans, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaefferer, Dietmar: 1987, ‘Bare Plurals, Naked Relatives, and their Kin’, Center for the Study of Language and Information, Report No. CSLI-87-112, Stanford, California.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This paper was presented to McGill University's Department of Linguistics (5 March, 1990), to the University of Toronto's Department of Linguistics (28 February, 1990), and at the Workshop on ‘The Semantic Issues of Mass Nouns, Plurals and Events’, held at the University of Tubingen's Seminar fur Naturlich-sprachliche Systeme (17–18 June, 1989). I thank the audiences in attendance at these presentations for their comments and criticisms. I also thank Peter Simons for written comments on an earlier draft of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gillon, B.S. Towards a common semantics for english count and mass nouns. Linguist Philos 15, 597–639 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00628112

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00628112

Keywords

Navigation