Skip to main content
Log in

Semantics and supervenience

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Allaire, E.: 1975, ‘Truth’, Metaphilosophy 6, 261–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asher, N., and Kamp, H.: 1987, ‘The Knower's Paradox and Representational Theories of Attitudes’, in Joseph Y. Halpern (ed.), Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning About Knowledge: Proceedings of the 1986 Conference, Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos, pp. 131–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacon, J.: 1986, ‘Supervenience, Necessary Coextension, and Reducibility’, Philosophical Studies 49, 163–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, J. and Etchemendy, J.: 1987, The Liar, Oxford, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belnap, N.: 1982, ‘Gupta's Rule of Revision Theory of Truth’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 11, 103–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonevac, D.: 1982, Reduction in the Abstract Sciences, Hackett, Indianapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonevac, D.: 1988, ‘Supervenience and Ontology’, American Philosophical Quarterly 25, 37–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burge, T.: 1979, ‘Semantical Paradox’, Journal of Philosophy 76, 169–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, K.: 1981, ‘Naturalism in Moral Philosophy’, Proceedings of the Russellian Society (Sydney) 6, 12–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R.: 1983, ‘Empiricism, Semantics and Ontology’, in P. Benacerraf and H. Putnam (eds.), Philosophy of Mathematics, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 2nd edition, pp. 241–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.: 1980, ‘Mental Events’, in D. Davidson (ed.), Essays on Actions and Events, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 207–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feferman, S.: 1984, ‘Toward Useful Type-free Theories I’, Journal of Symbolic Logic 49, 75–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, H.: 1972, ‘Tarski's Theory of Truth’, Journal of Philosophy 69, 347–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaifman, H.: 1988, ‘Operational Pointer Semantics: Solution to Self-referential Puzzles I’, in Moshe Vardi (ed.), Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Knowledge, Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos, pp. 43–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A.: 1982, ‘Truth and Paradox’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 11, 1–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A.: ‘The Meaning of ‘True’’, in E. LePore (ed.), New Directions in Semantics, Academic Press, London, pp. 453–80.

  • Gupta, A., and Belnap, N.: 1987, ‘A Note on Extension, Intension, and Truth’, Journal of Philosophy 84, 168–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haugeland, J.: 1982, ‘Weak Supervenience’, American Philosophical Quarterly 19, 93–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellman, G. and Thompson, F.: 1975, ‘Physicalism: Ontology, Determination, and Reduction’, Journal of Philosophy 72, 551–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellman, G., and Thompson, F.: 1977, ‘Physicalist Materialism’, Nous 11, 309–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzberger, H.: 1982a, ‘Naive Semantics and the Liar Paradox’, Journal of Philosophy 79, 479–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzberger, H.: 1982b, ‘Notes on Naive Semantics’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 11, 61–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horgan, T.: 1982, ‘Supervenience and Microphysics’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 63, 29–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J.: 1978, ‘Supervenience and Nomological Incommensurables’, American Philosophical Quarterly 15, 149–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J.: 1979, ‘Causality, Identity, and Supervenience in the Mind-Body Problem’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 4, 31–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koons, R.: 1987, Analogues of the Liar Paradox in Systems of Epistemic Logic Representing Meta-mathematical Reasoning and Strategic Rationality in Non-cooperative Games, PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koons, R.: 1992, Paradoxes of Reflective Reasoning, Cambridge University Press.

  • Kripke, S.: 1975, ‘Outline of a Theory of Truth’, Journal of Philosophy 72, 690–715.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loux, M.: 1978, ‘Rules, Roles, and Ontological Commitment: An Examination of Sellars' Theory of Abstract Reference’, in J. C. Pitt (ed.), The Philosophy of Wilfrid Sellars: Queries and Extensions, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 229–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S.: 1963, A System of Logic, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, C.: 1974, ‘The Liar Paradox’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 3, 381–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellars, W.: 1963a, ‘Abstract Entities’, Review of Metaphysics 16, 627–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellars, W.: 1963b, ‘Classes as Abstract Entities and the Russell Paradox’, Review of Metaphysics 17, 67–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soames, S.: 1984, ‘What is a Theory of Truth?’, Journal of Philosophy 81, 411–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarski, A.: 1944, ‘The Semantic Conception of Truth and the Foundations of Semantics’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 4, 341–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarski, A.: 1953, ‘A General Method in Proofs of Undecidability’, in A. Tarski, A. Mostowski, and J. Robinson, Undecidable Theories. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 1–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarski, A.: 1984a, ‘The Establishment of Scientific Semantics’, in Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics, Hackett, Indianapolis, pp. 401–08.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarski, A.: 1984b, ‘The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages’, in Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics, Hackett, Indianapolis, pp. 152–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teller, P.: 1984, ‘A Poor Man's Guide to Supervenience and Determination’, Southern Journal of Philosophy 22, Supplement, 137–62.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I have presented much of this research in talks at the University of Costa Rica and the University of Texas at Austin. I am grateful to my audiences for their comments and advice. I would like especially to thank Luis Camacho, Nicholas Asher, and Robert Koons. Many of the ideas in the paper stem from an informal seminar on type-free theories held at the University of Texas's Center for Cognitive Science from 1984 to 1987. I am grateful to the participants in that seminar — Ignacio Angelelli, Nicholas Asher, Herbert Hochberg, Hans Kamp, Frederick Kronz, Per Lindström and Mark Sainsbury — for their many insights into type-free semantics, and to the Center for Cognitive Science for providing such a hospitable environment for this work. I have also profited from the criticisms of two anonymous referees. Finally, I am indebted to the University of Texas's University Research Institute and to the National Science Foundation's Information Science and History and Philosophy of Science programs for grant support.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bonevac, D. Semantics and supervenience. Synthese 87, 331–361 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00499816

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00499816

Navigation