Skip to main content
Log in

Beyond the exclusively propositional era

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Contemporary epistemology has assumed that knowledge is represented in sentences or propositions. However, a variety of extensions and alternatives to this view have been proposed in other areas of investigation. We review some of these proposals, focusing on (1) Ryle's notion of knowing how and Hanson's and Kuhn's accounts of theory-laden perception in science; (2) extensions of simple propositional representations in cognitive models and artificial intelligence; (3) the debate concerning imagistic versus propositional representations in cognitive psychology; (4) recent treatments of concepts and categorization which reject the notion of necessary and sufficient conditions; and (5) parallel distributed processing (connectionist) models of cognition. This last development is especially promising in providing a flexible, powerful means of representing information nonpropositionally, and carrying out at least simple forms of inference without rules. Central to several of the proposals is the notion that much of human cognition might consist in pattern recognition rather than manipulation of rules and propositions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, J. R.: 1978, ‘Arguments Concerning Representations for Mental Imagery’, Psychological Review 85, 249–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R.: 1983, The Architecture of Cognition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, S. L., L. R. Gleitman and H. Gleitman: 1983, ‘On What Some Concepts Might Not Be’, Cognition 13, 263–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J. L: 1961, Philosophical papers, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou, L. W.: 1986, ‘The Instability of Graded Structures: Implications for the nature of concepts’, in U. Neisser (ed.), Concepts and Conceptual Development: Ecological and Intellectual Factors in Categorization, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechtel, W.: 1987, ‘Connectionism and the Philosophy of Mind: An Overview’, Southern Journal of Philosophy 26, Supplement, 17–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechtel, W. and A. A. Abrahamsen: 1990, Connectionism and the Mind: An Introduction to Parallel Processing in Networks. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benner, P.: 1984, From Novice to Expert: Excellence and Power in Clinical Nursing Practice, Addison-Wesley, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, B. and P. Kay: 1969, Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, F.: 1968, ‘A Deductive Question-Answering System’, in M. Minsky (ed.), Semantic Information Processing, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 354–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobrow, D. G. and T. Winograd: ‘An Overview of KRL, A Knowledge Representation Language’, Cognitive Science 1, 3–46.

  • Chomsky, N.: 1957, Syntactic Structures, Mouton, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H. H.: 1969, ‘Linguistic Processes in Deductive Reasoning’, Psychological Review 76, 387–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, L. A. and R. N. Shepard: 1973, ‘Chronometric Studies of the Rotation of Mental Images’, in W. G. Chase (ed.), ‘Visual Information Processing’, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, H. L. and S. E. Dreyfus: 1986, Mind Over Machine, The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer, Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farah, M. J.: 1988, ‘Is Visual Imagery Really Visual? Overlooked Evidence from Neurophysiology’, Psychological Review 95, 307–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fillmore, C.: 1982, ‘Frame Semantics’, in Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.), Linguistics In The Morning Calm, Hanshin, Seoul, pp. 111–38.

  • Fodor, J. A and Z. W. Pylyshyn: 1988, ‘Connectionism and Cognitive Architecture: A Critical Analysis’, Cognition 28, 3–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, N.: 1955, Fact, Fiction, and Forecast, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, N. R.: 1958, Patterns of Discovery, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinton, G.: 1986, ‘Learning Distributed Representations of Concepts’, Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huttenlocher, J. and E. T. Higgins: 1971, ‘Adjectives, Comparatives and Syllogisms’, Psychological Review 78, 487–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird, P. N.: 1983, Mental Models, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kintsch, W.: 1974, The Representation of Meaning in Memory, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosslyn, S. M.: 1980, Image and Mind, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosslyn, S. M., T. M. Ball and B. J. Reiser: 1978, ‘Visual Images Preserve Metric Spatial Information: Evidence from Studies of Image Scanning’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 47–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S.: 1970, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2nd ed.), University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langacker, R.: 1986, Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Volume 13, Stanford University Press, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G.: 1987, Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, H.: 1987, Patterns, Thinking, and Cognition. A Theory of Judgment, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCauley, R. N.: 1988, ‘Epistemology in an Age of Cognitive Science’, Philosophical Psychology, 1, 143–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, J. L. and D. E. Rumelhart: 1988, Explorations in Parallel Distributed Processing. A Handbook of Models, Programs, and Exercises, MIT Press/Bradford Books, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, J. L., D. E. Rumelhart and the PDP Research Group: 1986, Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition. Vol. 2, Psychological and Biological Models. MIT Press/Bradford Books, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medin, D. L. and Wattenmaker: 1986, ‘Category Cohesiveness, Theories, and Cognitive Architecture’, in U. Neisser (ed.), Concepts and Conceptual Development: Ecological and Intellectual Factors in Categorization, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, pp. 25–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minsky, M. A.: 1975, ‘A Framework for Representing Knowledge’, in P. H. Winston (ed.), The Psychology of Computer Vision, McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 211–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minsky, M. A. and S. Papert: 1969, Perceptrons, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyer, R. S.: 1973, ‘Comparing Objects in Memory: Evidence Suggesting an Internal Psychophysics’ Perception and Psychophysics 13, 180–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, G. L. and D. L. Medin: 1985, ‘The Role of Theories in Conceptual Coherence’, Psychological Review 92, 389–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. A., D. E. Rumelhart and the LNR Research Group: 1975, Explorations in Cognition, Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paivio, A.: 1971, Imagery and Verbal Processes, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, S. E.: 1978, ‘Fundamental Aspects of Cognitive Representation’, in E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (eds.), Cognition and Categorization, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 259–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pylyshyn W.: 1981, ‘The Imagery Debate: Analogue Media versus Tacit Knowledge’, Psychological Review 88, 16–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quillian, M. R.: 1968, ‘Semantic Memory’, in M. Minsky (ed.), Semantic Information Processing, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 227–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V.: 1969, ‘Epistemology Naturalized’, in W. V. Quine (ed.), Ontological Relativity and Other Essays, Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 69–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, E. H.: 1978, ‘Principles of Categorization’, in E. Rosch and B. B. Lloyd (eds.), Cognition and Categorization, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, E. H. and C. B. Mervis: 1975, ‘Family Resemblances: Studies in the Internal Structure of Categories’, Cognitive Psychology 7, 573–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblatt, F.: 1962, Principles of Neurodynamics, Spartan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D. E.: 1975, ‘Notes on a Schema for Stories’, in D. G. Bobrow and A. M. Collins (eds.), Representation and Understanding, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D. E., J. L. McClelland and the PDP Research Group: 1986, Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition. Vol. 1, Foundations, MIT Press/Bradford Books, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B.: 1940, An Inquiry into Meaning and Truth, George Allen & Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, G.: 1949, The Concept of Mind, Barnes and Noble, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schank, R. C. and R. Abelson: 1977, Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selfridge, O. G.: 1955, ‘Pattern Recognition in Modern Computers’, Proceedings of the Western Joint Computer Conference.

  • Shepard, R. N., and J. Metzler: 1971, ‘Mental Rotation of Three-dimensional Objects’, Science 171, 701–703.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. E. and D. L. Medin: 1981, Categories and Concepts, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wason, P. C.: 1969, ‘Regression in Reasoning?’, British Journal of Psychology 60, 471–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L.: 1953, Philosophical Investigations, Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The preparation of this article was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grants No. NICHD-19265 and NICHD-06016. We would like to thank Rita Anderson, David Blumenfeld, Robert McCauley, and Patricia Siple for helpful discussions on points in this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bechtel, W., Abrahamsen, A.A. Beyond the exclusively propositional era. Synthese 82, 223–253 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413663

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413663

Keywords

Navigation