Skip to main content
Log in

An empirical study of moral reasoning among managers in Singapore

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study reported here sought to examine the ethical orientations of business managers and business students in Singapore. Data were obtained using Defining Issue Test. Analysis of Variance revealed that age, education and religious affiliation had influenced cognitive moral development stages of the respondents. Vocation, gender and ethnicity did not seem to have affected moral judgement of the subjects. Contrary to the general view, both business students and business managers demonstrated the same level of sensitivity to ethical dimensions of decision-making. Implications of the findings and limitations of the study are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference

  • Alston, W. P.: 1971, ‘Comments on Kohlberg's From is to ought’, in T. Michel (ed.), Cognitive Development and Epistemology (Academic Press, New York), pp. 269–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, K. R.: 1969, ‘Towards Professionalism in Business Management’, Harvard Business Review, March–April, 49–59.

  • Ansberry, C.: 1988, ‘For these M.B.A.s, Class Becomes Exercise in Corporate Espionage’, Wall Street Journal 22.

  • Arlow, P. and T. A. Ulrich: 1980, ‘Business Ethics, Social Responsibility and Business Studies: An Empirical Comparison of Clark's Study’, Akron Business Review 11, 17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A.: 1965, ‘Influence of Model's Reinforcement Contingencies on the Acquisition of Imitative Responses’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1, 589–595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumhart, R.: 1968, An Honest Profit: What Businessmen Say about Ethics in Business (Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. B. and L. Annis: 1978, ‘Moral Development Level and Religious Behaviour’, Psychological Reports 43, 12–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chazan, B.: 1985, Contemporary Approaches to Moral Education: Analyzing Alternative Theories (Teachers College Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Colby, A. and L. Kohlberg: 1987, The Measurement of Moral Judgment: Theoretical Foundation & Research Validations, and Standard Issue Scoring Manual (Vols. 1 and 2) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, D.: 1972, ‘The Analysis of An Objective Measure of Moral Development’, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Minnesota.

  • Crow, S. M., L. Y. Fok, S. J. Hartman and D. M. Payne: 1991, ‘Gender and Values: What Is the Impact on Decision-Making?’ Sex Roles 25(3/4), 255–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davison, M. C. and S. Robbins: 1978, ‘The Reliability and Validity of Objective Indices of Moral Development’, Applied Psychological Measurement 2, 391–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeGeorge, R. T.: 1989, ‘There is Ethics in Business Ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics 5, 421–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derry, R.: 1989, ‘An Empirical Study of Moral Reasoning Among Managers’, Journal of Business Ethics 8, 755–862.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E.: 1956, Educational Sociology (Free Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E.: 1953, Socialogy and Philosophy (Free Press, Glencoe, Il.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E.: 1961, Moral Education (Free Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dykstra, C.: 1980, ‘Moral Virtue or Social Reasoning?’, Religious Education 75, 115–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elm, D. and M. L. Nichols: 1990, ‘Influences on the Moral Reasoning of Managers’, discussion paper #139 Strategic Management Research Center, University of Minnesota.

  • Endler, N. S., J. P. Rushton and H. L. Roediger: 1978, ‘Productivity and Scholarly Impact’, American Psychologist 33, 1064–1082.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, J. E.: 1978, ‘Authorities in Business Ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics 6, 213–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritzsche, D. J. and H. Becker: 1984, ‘Linking Management Behaviour to Ethical Philosophy: An Empirical Investigation’, Academy of Management Journal 27(4), 166–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritzsche, D. J. and H. Becker: 1983, ‘Ethical Beliefs of Marketing Managers’, Journal of Marketing, 69–73.

  • Gibbs, J. C. and K. F. Widaman: 1982, Social Intelligence: Measuring the Development of Sociomoral Reflection (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C.: 1979, ‘Women's Place in Man's Life Cycle’, Harvard Educational Review 49, 431–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C.: 1982, In A different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development (Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C.: 1977, ‘In A Different Voice: Women's Conception of Self and Morality’, Harvard Educational Review 47, 481–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollon, C. J. and T. A. Ulrich: 1979, ‘Personal Business Ethics: Managers vs. Managers-To-Be’, Southern Business Review 5, 17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L.: 1971, ‘From is to Ought: How to Commit the Naturalistic Fallacy and Get Away With it in the Study of Moral Development’, in T. Michel (ed.), Cognitive Development (Academic Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L.: 1984, Essays on Moral Development, Volume II: The Psychology of Moral Development (Harper & Row, San Francisco).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L.: 1981, The Psychology of Moral Development: Moral Stages and the Idea of Justice (Harper & Row, San Francisco).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L.: 1976, ‘Moral Stages and Motivation: The Cognitive Developmental Approach’, in T. Lickona (ed.), Moral Development and Behaviour: Theory, Research and Social Issues (Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L.: 1969, ‘Stage and Consequences: The Cognitive Development Approach to Socialization’, in D. G. Goslin (ed.), Handbook of Socialization: Theory, Research and Social Issues (Holt, Rinehart & Row, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, M. and Oldenquist A.: 1986, ‘Egoistic and Nonegoistic Motives in Social Dilemmas’, American Psychology, 529–534.

  • Lysonski, S. and Gaidis W.: 1991, ‘A Cross-Cultural Comparison of the Ethics of Business Students’, Journal of Business Ethics 10, 141–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGeorge, C.: 1975, ‘Susceptibility to Faking of the defining Issues Test of Moral Development’, Developmental Psychology 11, 108–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metha, S. C. and A. K. Kau: 1984, ‘Alienation of Marketing Executives’, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 133–145.

  • Nichols, M. L. and V. E. Day: 1982, ‘A Comparison of Moral Reasoning of Groups and Individuals on the “Defining Issues Test”’, Academy of Management Journal 25 (1), 201–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrof, J. V., E. E. Sayegh and P. I. Valhopoulos: 1981, The Influence of the School and Business on the Values of Its Students, paper presented at the Academy of Management, San Diego.

  • Piaget, J.: 1932, The Moral Judgement of the Child (Free Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, D. M.: 1987, ‘Methodology in Business Ethics Research: A Review and Critical Assessment’, Journal of Business Ethics 9, 457–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raths, L., M. Harmin and S. Simon: 1966, Values and Teaching (Charles E. Merill, Columbus OH).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. R.: 1979, Development in Judging Moral Issues (University of Minnesota, Minneapolis).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. R.: 1987, Guide for the Defining Issues Test (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. R.: 1988, Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory (Praeger, New York), in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. R.: 1976, ‘New Approaches in the Assessment of Moral Judgement’, in T. Lickona (ed.), Moral Development and Behaviour (Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York), pp. 198–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. R.: 1975, ‘Longitudinal Study of the Defining Issues Test of Moral Judgement: A Strategy for Analyzing Developmental Change’, Development Psychology 6, 738–748.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. R.: 1983, ‘Morality’, in J. Flarell and E. Markman (ed.), Manual for Child Psychology, Cognitive Development (Vol. III) (Wiley, New York), pp. 556–629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricklefs, R.: 1983, ‘Executives and General Public Say Ethical Behaviour is Declining in U.S.’, Wall Street Journal, October 31.

  • Robin, D. P. and R. E. Reidenbach: 1987, ‘Social Responsibility, Ethics and Marketing Strategy: Closing the Gap Between Concepts and Applications’, Journal of Marketing 51, 44–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapp, G. L.: 1986, ‘Moral Judgement and Religious Orientation’, in G. L. Sapp (ed.), Handbook of Moral Development (Religious Education Press, Birmingham AL).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H.: 1966, ‘The Problem of Moral Education for the Business Manager’, Industrial Management Review 8, 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singapore Institute of Management: 1981, The Managerial Manpower Survey of Singapore 1981.

  • Swinyard, W. R., T. J. DeLong and P. S. Cheng: 1989, ‘The Relationship Between Moral Decisions and their Consequences: A Tradeoff Analysis Approach’, Journal of Business Ethics 8, 289–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinyard, W. R., H. Rinne and A. K. Kau: 1990, ‘The Morality of Software Piracy: A Cross-Cultural Analysis’, Journal of Business Ethics 9, 655–664.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tawney, H. A.: 1961, The Acquisitive Society (Fontana, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Terpstra, V.: 1979, The Cultural Environment of International Business (South Western Publishing Company, Cincinatti).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoma, L.: 1986, ‘Estimating Gender Differences in the Comprehension and Preference of Moral Issues’, Development Review 6, 165–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoma, S. J.: 1985, ‘On Improving the Relationship between Moral Reasoning and External Criteria: The Utilizer/Nonutilizer Dimension’, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L. K.: 1992, ‘Moral Reasoning and Business Ethics: Implications for Research, Education and Management’, Journal of Business Ethics 11(3), 610–611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L. K. and S. A. Youngblood: 1990, ‘Bad Apples in Bad Barrels: A Causal Analysis of Ethical Decision-Making Behaviour’, Journal of Applied Psychology 4, 478–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, L.: 1984, ‘Sex Differences in the Development of Moral Reasoning. A Critical Review’, Child Development 55, 677–691.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, J. A., F. Bird and P. D. Chant: 1986, ‘Everyday Moral Issues Experiences by Managers’, Journal of Business Ethics 5, 373–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, J.: 1981, Reason and Morals (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, S. R.: 1970, Moral Thinking (Heinemann Educational, London).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Jayantha S. Wimalasiri is Senior Lecturer of Business Policy at the National University of Singapore. His primary professional and research interests are in Human Resource Management and Business Policy/Strategic Management.

Francis Pavri is Lecturer of Decision Science at the National University of Singapore. He received his first degree in Engineering and Ph.D. in Business Administration. Prior to joining the university he worked at IBM (Singapore) as a systems engineer and later as a systems consultant in a local consulting firm.

Abdul A. K. Jalil graduated with Honours in Business Administration at the National University of Singapore. He is currently working as an executive officer in the public sector.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wimalasiri, J.S., Pavri, F. & Jalil, A.A.K. An empirical study of moral reasoning among managers in Singapore. J Bus Ethics 15, 1331–1341 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00411818

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00411818

Keywords

Navigation