Skip to main content
Log in

Corporate social responsibility in the European Communities — The Scandinavian viewpoint

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two of the Scandinavian countries, Sweden and Finland have recently joined the European Communities. Together with a third Scandinavian country, Denmark, which joined the Communities two decades ago it seems likely that Scandinavian views and attitudes will make a great impact on the future work of the European Communities — including the on-going harmonisation in the field of corporate social responsibility.

This article provides an examination of the Scandinavian view on the five best known models for achieving corporate social responsibility and it shows the likely impact of the admittance of the Scandinavian countries on the future work in the European Communities with regard to corporate social responsibility.

The article concludes that the most likely impact of the increased Scandinavian participation in the European Communities is that the regulation and enforcement model is given significantly increased support and that the non-shareholder interest representation model is given increased support at least with regard to employee representation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berle, A. A. and G. C. Means: 1967, The Modern Corporation and Private Property, revised edition (Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc., New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, S.: 1994, ‘Levi's Stiller Betingelser’, Amnesty 1, 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borum, O. A.: 1963, ‘Bidrag til en funktionel undersøgelse af aktieselskabsbegrebt’, Juristen, 31 1–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borum, O. A.: 1968, ‘Aktieselskabers formålsangivelse’, Ugeskrift for Retsvœsen, 225–230.

  • Boyle, A. J. (ed.): 1986, Gore-Browne on Companies, 44th edition (Jordan, Bristol).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, T.: 1992, Corporate Responsibility (Pitman Publishing, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodd, E. M,: 1932, ‘For Whom are Corporate Managers Trustees?’, Harvard Law Review 45, 1145–1163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dotevall, R.: 1989, Skadeståndsansvar för styrelsesledamot och verkställande direktör (Norstedts, Stockholm).

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist: 1926, ‘The ownership of British Industrial Capital. — I’, The Economist 103, 1053–1054.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrar, J. H., N. E. Furey and B. M. Hannigan: 1991, Farrar's Company Law (Butterworths, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M.: undated, Capitalism and Freedom (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago).

  • Glasbeek, H. J.: 1988, ‘The Corporate Social Responsibility Movement — The Latest in Maginot Lines to Save Capitalism’, Dalhousie Law Journal, 363–402.

  • Gower, L. C. B.: 1992, Gower's Principles of Modern Company Law (Sweet & Maxwell, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Haahr, M.: 1994, ‘Amnesty Business Club’, Amnesty 1, 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, W. A.: 1981, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility — A New Term for an Old Concept with New Significiance’, in T. Bradshaw and D. Vogel (eds.) Corporations and Their Critics — Issues and Answers to the Problems of Corporate Social Responsibility (McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, P., M. Trebilcock and S. Turnbull: 1980, ‘An Economic Analysis of Limited Liability in Corporation Law’, University of Toronto Law Journal 30, 117–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, B.: 1958, ‘Book Review of the American Stockholder by J. A. Livingston’, Yale Law Journal 67, 1477–1496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nørskov, S.: 1994, ‘Kampen om Kunderne’, Amnesty 1, 8–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schans Christensen, J.: 1991, Contested Takeovers in Danish Law — A Comparative Analysis based on a Law and Economics Approach (G.E.C. Gads Forlag, Copenhagen).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schans Christensen, J.: 1992, Ledelse & Aktionœrer — 6 essays om den moderne selskabs — og børsret (G.E.C. Gads Forlag, Copenhagen), pp. 31–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, M.: 1986, ‘Company Law and Legal Theory’, in Twinning (ed.), Legal Theory and Common Law (Basil Balckwell, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, C. D.: 1975, Where the Law Ends — The Social Control of Corporate Behaviour (Harper & Row, Publishers, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wedderburn of Charlton, Lord: 1985, ‘The Social responsibility of Companies’, Melbourne University Law Review 15, 4–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, W.: 1981, ‘Corporation Law in Search of its Future’, Columbia Law Review 81, 1611–1666.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Mr. Broberg is a research scholar in the Faculty of Law of the University of Copenhagen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Broberg, M.P. Corporate social responsibility in the European Communities — The Scandinavian viewpoint. J Bus Ethics 15, 615–622 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00411796

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00411796

Keywords

Navigation