Skip to main content
Log in

Search mechanism of a stream grazer in patchy environments: the role of food abundance

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The search behavior of the grazing stream insect Baetis tricaudatus (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae) was examined in field and laboratory experiments. Regardless of food abundance in experimental habitats, nymphs spent significantly more time in food patches than predicted if they had moved randomly with respect to patches. A significant reduction in movement rate within patches relative to movement rate between patches largely accounted for these results. The movement pattern within patches was highly systematic and in agreement with predictions of optimal foraging theory since food was uniformly distributed within patches. Between-patch search movements were affected by food abundance in the most recently grazed patch. Search intensity after departure from a patch was positively related to food abundance in the patch while movement rate after patch departure was inversely related to patch food level. These effects produced between-patch movement patterns that were suboptimal in the experimental habitats because they resulted in revisitation of previously depleted patches. However, differences between experimental and natural habitats in the spatial occurrence of patch types suggest that Baetis between-patch search behavior may be adaptive in natural habitats.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bailey PR (1981) Diel activity patterns in nymphs of an Australian mayfly Atalophlebioides sp. (Ephemeroptera: Leptophlebiidae). Aust J Mar Freshwater Res 32:121–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck SD (1968) Insect photoperiodism. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergman EA, Hilsenhoff WL (1978) Baetis (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae) of Wisconsin. Great Lakes Entomol 11:125–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond AB (1980) Optimal foraging in a uniform habitat: the search mechanism of the green lacewing. Anim Behav 28:10–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman DW, Demory RL (1963) Seasonal changes in the food ingested by aquatic insect larvae and nymphs in two Oregon streams. Ecology 44:140–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnov EL (1976) Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. Theor Pop Biol 9:129–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark JR, Dickson KL, Cairns J (1979) Estimating Aufwuchs biomass. In: Weitzel RL (ed) Methods and measurements of periphyton communities: a review. American Society for Testing and Materials ASTM STP 690:116–141

  • Elliott JM (1967) Invertebrate drift in a Dartmoor stream. Arch Hydrobiol 63:202–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott JM (1968) The daily activity patterns of mayfly nymphs (Ephemeroptera). J Zool Lond 155:201–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Elwood JW, Newbold JD, Trimble AF, Stark RW (1981) The limiting role of phosphorus in a woodland stream ecosystem: effects of P enrichment on leaf decomposition and primary producers. Ecology 62:146–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee JH, Bartnik VG (1969) Simple stream tank simulating a rapids environment. J Fish Res Bd Canada 26:2227–2230

    Google Scholar 

  • Guillard RRL (1973) Culture of phytoplankton for feeding marine invertebrates. In: Smith WL, Chanley MH (eds) Culture of marine invertebrate animals. Plenum Publishing Corporation New York, pp 29–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart DD (1981) Foraging and resource patchiness: field experiments with a grazing stream insect. Oikos 37:46–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart DD, Resh VH (1980) Movement patterns and foraging ecology of a stream caddisfly larva. Can J Zool 58:1174–1185

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassel MP, Southwood TRE (1978) Foraging strategies of insects. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 9:75–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollander M, Wolfe DA (1973) Nonparametric statistical methods. John Wiley and Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hynes HBN (1970) The ecology of running waters. University of Toronto Press Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones JG (1974) A method for observation and enumeration of eplitihic algae directly on the surfaces of stones. Oecologia (Berlin) 16:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones RE (1977) Search behaviour: a study of three caterpillar species. Behaviour 60:237–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler SL (1983) Positioning on substrates, positioning changes, and diel drift periodicities in mayflies. Can J Zool 61:1362–1368

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs JR (1978) Optimal foraging: decision rules for predators. In: Krebs JR, Davies, NB (ed) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell Scientific Publications Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden J, Alexander G, Shetter D (1967) Numerical changes and population regulation in brook trout, Salvelinus fontinalis. J Fish Res Bd Can 24:1425–1459

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamara J (1982) Optimal patch use in a stochastic environment. Theor Pop Biol 21:269–288

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamara J, Houston A (1980) The application of statistical decision theory to animal behaviour. J Theor Biol 85:673–690

    Google Scholar 

  • Morihara DK, McCafferty WP (1979) The Baetis larvae of North America (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae). Trans Amer Ent Soc 105:139–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Muteanu N, Maly (1981) The effect of current on the distribution of diatoms settling on submerged glass slides. Hydrobiologia 78:273–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Oaten A (1977) Optimal foraging in patches: a case for stochasticity. Theor Pop Biol 12:263–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Pryfogle PA, Lowe RL (1979) Sampling and interpretation of epilithic lotic diatom communities. In: Weitzel RL (ed) Methods and measurements of periphyton communities: a review. American Society for Testing and Materials ASTM STP 690:77–89

  • Pyke GH (1978a) Optimal foraging: movement patterns of bumblebees between inflorescences. Theor Pop Biol 13:72–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke GH (1978b) Optimal foraging in hummingbirds: testing the marginal value theorem. Amer Zool 18:739–752

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke GH (1978c) Are animals efficient harvesters? Anim Behav 26:241–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke GH (1979) Optimal foraging in bumblebees: rule of movement between flowers within inflorescences. Anim Behav 27:1167–1181

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke GH (1981) Optimal foraging in hummingbirds: rule of movement between inflorescences. Anim Behav 29:889–896

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW (1974) The compression hypothesis and temporal resource partitioning. Proc Nat Acad sci USA 71:4169–4172

    Google Scholar 

  • Sih A (1982) Optimal patch use: variation in selective pressure for efficient foraging. Am Nat 120:666–685

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson RJ (1981) Microphytobenthos accumulation and current. Dissertation. The University of Michigan Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel S, LaBarbera M (1978) Simple flow tanks for research and teaching. BioScience 28:638–643

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters TF (1972) The drift of stream insects. Ann Rev Entomol 17:253–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley MJ, Kohler SL (1980) Positioning changes in mayfly nymphs due to behavioral regulation of oxygen consumption. Can J Zool 58:618–622

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley MJ, Kohler SL (1981) An assessment of biological interactions in an epilithic stream community using time-lapse cinematography. Hydrobiologia 78:183–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley MJ, Kohler SL (1984) Behavioral adaptations of aquatic insects. In: Resh VH, Rosenberg DM (eds) The ecology of aquatic insects. Praeger Scientific Publications New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman M (1979) Optimal foraging: a case for random movement. Oecologia (Berlin) 43:261–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman M (1982) Optimal foraging: random movement by pollen collecting bumblebees. Oecologia (Berlin) 53:394–398

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kohler, S.L. Search mechanism of a stream grazer in patchy environments: the role of food abundance. Oecologia 62, 209–218 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379015

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379015

Keywords

Navigation