Conclusion
Using an example drawn from evolutionary biology, I have shown that distinct, competing explanations may nonetheless postulate identical networks of causal processes and interactions. It follows from this that to provide a causal explanation is to do more than describe a network of causal processes and interactions. In the example given, it seems that the proffered explanations also purport to describe probabilistic causal relations of the sort rejected by Salmon.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Eells, E. (1991) Probabilistic Causality. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Ford, E. B. (1964) Ecological Genetics. London: Chapman and Hall.
Hitchcock, C. R. (1993) “A Generalized Probabilistic Theory of Causal Relevance,” Synthese 97: 335–364.
Hitchcock, C. R. (1995a) “Discussion: Salmon on Explanatory Relevance,” Philosophy of Science 62: 305–320.
Hitchcock, C. R. (1995b) “The Mishap at Reichenbach Fall: Singular vs. General Causation,” Philosophical Studies 78: 257–291.
Hitchcock, C. R. (forthcoming) “The Role of Contrast in Causal and Explanatory Claims,” Synthese.
Lamotte, M. (1959) “Polymorphism of Natural Populations of Cepea Nemoralis,” Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on Quantitative Biology 24: 65–86.
Robson, G. C. and Richards, O. W. (1936) The Variation of Animals in Nature. London: Longmans and Green.
Salmon, W. C. (1971) “Statistical Explanation,” in Salmon, W. C., Greeno, J. G. and Jeffrey, R. C. (eds.), Statistical Explanation and Statistical Relevance, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 29–87.
Salmon, W. C. (1984) Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Salmon, W. C. (1994) “Causality without Counterfactuals,” Philosophy of Science 61: 297–312.
Sober, E. (1984) The Nature of Selection. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Van Fraassen, B. C. (1980) The Scientific Image. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hitchcock, C.R. The mechanist and the snail. Philosophical Studies 84, 91–105 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00364675
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00364675