Skip to main content
Log in

A quantitative study of chromosomal elasticity and its influence on chromosome movement

  • Published:
Chromosoma Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Chromosome elasticity and movement have been studied in living cells in two distinct situations: early anaphase stretch due to opposed external forces, and drag stretch — an elongation due to frictional resistance or drag on a chromosome being pulled toward one pole. Drag stretch provides a simultaneous display of both friction and elasticity and shows that chromosomes in living cells are elastic up to approximately six-fold increases in length.

Neither early anaphase stretch nor drag stretch produce detectable alterations in the velocity of chromosome movement. A simple mechanical model is described which permits interpretation of this result for drag stretch: no matter how extensive, drag stretch should produce no change in the force required to maintain a given velocity of movement and hence should not alter movement velocity. Early anaphase stretch is a very different proposition, and additional assumptions leading to a quantitative model are necessary for its interpretation. Nevertheless it is reasonably certain that the amount of stretch actually seen in these circumstances would influence chromosome movement if the applied force were not increased over that necessary in the absence of stretch. It is concluded that the mitotic forces are continually adjusted to produce a standard velocity of movement even when an unusual hindrance to movement exists. The implications of this are considered, particularly in regard to the stretching and rupture of dikinetochoric (“dicentric”) bridges in anaphase.

The quantitative version of the mechanical model for elasticity and movement can be applied to the drag stretch data, and permits calculation of the ratio between frictional and elastic coefficients. The chief assumptions are that the elasticity is Hookian, and the frictional resistance Newtonian in character. The model has not been critically tested, but it is consonant with existing data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bland, D. R.: The theory of linear viscoelasticity. New York: Pergamon 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck, J. B.: Manipulation of salivary gland chromosomes. J. Hered. 33, 3–10 (1942).

    Google Scholar 

  • Callan, H. G.: Recent work on the structure of cell nuclei. In: Symposium on Fine Structure of Cells. Int. Union Biol. Sci. publications, Ser. B 21, 89–109. Groningen: Noordhoff z1955.

  • Chambers, R., and H. C. Sands: A dissection of the chromosomes in the pollen mother cells of Tradescttntia virginica L. J. gen. Physiol. 5, 815–820 (1923).

    Google Scholar 

  • Crick, F. H. C., and A. F. W. Hughes: The physical properties of cytoplasm. Exp. Cell Res. 1, 37–80 (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  • D'Angelo, E. G.: Salivary gland chromosomes. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 50, 910 to 919 (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, R.: Multiple Geschlechtschromosomen bei den cypriden Ostracoden, ihre Evolution und ihr Teilungsverhalten. Chromosoma (Berl.) 9, 359–440 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, A. F., and M. M. Swann: Anaphase movements in the living cell. J. exp. Biol. 25, 45–70 (1948).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes-Schrader, S.: Polarization, kinetochore movements, and bivalent structure in the meiosis of male mantids. Biol. Bull. 85, 265–300 (1943).

    Google Scholar 

  • —: The “pre-metaphase stretch” and kinetochore orientation in phasmids. Chromosoma (Berl.) 3, 1–21 (1947).

    Google Scholar 

  • Izutsu, K.: Irradiation of parts of single mitotic apparatus in grasshopper spermatocytes with an ultraviolet-microbeam. Mie med. J. 9, 15–29 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacquez, J. A., and J. J. Biesele: A study of Michel's film on meiosis in Psophus stridulus L. Exp. Cell Res. 6, 17–29 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopac, M. J.: Recent developments in cellular micrurgy. Trans. N. Y. Acad. Sci., Ser. II 17, 257–265 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicklas, R. B.: Recurrent pole-to-pole movements of the sex chromosome during prometaphase I in Melanoplus differentialis spermatocytes. Chromosoma (Berl.) 12, 97–115 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  • - The influence of chromosome size and position on the velocity of chromosome movement in prometaphase and anaphase. (Manuscript in preparation.)

  • Reiner, M.: Deformation, strain and flow, 2nd ed. London: Lewis 1960.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This investigation was supported in part by research grant number RG-8480 from the Division of General Medical Sciences, United States Public Health Service.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nicklas, R.B. A quantitative study of chromosomal elasticity and its influence on chromosome movement. Chromosoma 14, 276–295 (1963). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00326816

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00326816

Keywords

Navigation