Skip to main content
Log in

Structure and phylogenetic interpretation of diplopod eyes (Diplopoda)

  • Published:
Zoomorphology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The structural organization of the ocelli of several diplopod species has been studied by means of electron microscopy. The results provide evidence that diplopodan ocelli are derived from typical mandibulate ommatidia, which consequently had been present in diplopod ancestors. The recent representatives of the two sister groups, Pselaphognatha and Chilognatha are characterized by two essentially different types of eye morphology: The eyes of the Pselaphognatha comprise a bilayered rhabdom (built up by 3+4 retinular cells), a few corneagenous cells, a corneal lens, and two vitreous bodies. The latter probably represent relics of a former crystalline cone. On the contrary, the ocelli of the Chilognatha consist of a multilayered rhabdom (built up by a large number of retinular cells), numerous corneagenous cells, and a corneal lens. The dioptric apparatus lacks a crystalline cone. Further structural elements, the distribution of which varies, are the covering cells and processes of hypodermal cells which contain screening pigments. Whereas the eye of the Pselaphognatha can be traced back to a single ommatidium, the ocellus of the Chilognatha can only be interpreted as a merging product of several associated ommatidia or as the result of multiplication and rearrangement of former ommatidial elements. This concept is substantiated by analogous phenomena which occur within other arthropod groups and thus serve as models for the phylogeny of the diplopodan eyes. The comparison of the morphology and the ecology of palaeozoic and recent diplopods demonstrates that the disintegration of former facetted eyes and the modification of ommatidia were induced by the adaptation to cryptic modes of life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adensamer T (1894) Zur Kenntnis der Anatomie und Histologie von Scutigera coleoptrata. Verh Zool-Bot Ges Wien 43:573–578

    Google Scholar 

  • Bähr R (1971) Die Ultrastruktur der Photorezeptoren von Lithobius forficatus L. (Chilopoda: Lithobiidae). Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat 116:70–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Bähr R (1974) Contribution to the morphology of chilopod eyes. Symp Zool Soc London 32:383–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Barra JA (1971) Les photorécèpteurs des Collemboles, étude ultrastructurale I. L'appareil dioptrique. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat 117:322–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedini C (1968) The ultrastructure of the eye of a centipede Polybothrus fasciatus (Newport). Monit Zool Ital 2:31–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedini C (1970) The fine structure of the eye in Glomeris (Diplopoda). Monit Zool Ital 4:201–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierbrodt E (1942) Der Larvenkopf von Panorpa communis und seine Verwandlung, mit besonderer Berücksichtigung des Gehirns und der Augen. Zool Jahrb Anat Ontog Tiere Abt 68(1):49–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandenburg J (1960) Die Feinstruktur des Seitenauges von Lepisma saccharina (Thysanura). Zool Beitr 5:291–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Busselmann A (1935) Bau und Entwicklung der Raupenocellen der Mehlmotte Ephestia kühniella Zeller. Z Morphol Oekol Tiere 29:218–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl E (1965) Frontal organs and protocerebral neurosecretory systems in Crustacea and Insecta. Gen Comp Endocrinol 5:614–617

    Google Scholar 

  • Demoll R (1917) Die Sinnesorgane der Arthropoden, ihr Bau und ihre Funktion. Braunschweig Vieweg, pp 243

    Google Scholar 

  • Dohle W (1980) Sind die Myriapoden eine monophyletische Gruppe? Eine Diskussion der Verwandtschaftsbeziehungen der Antennaten. Abh Verh Naturwiss Ver Hamburg 23:45–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Elofsson RE (1970) Brain and eyes of Zygentoma (Thysanura). Entomol Scand 1:1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritsch A (1899) Fauna der Gaskohle und der Kalksteine der Permformation Böhmens. 4. Prag Selbstverlag

    Google Scholar 

  • Graber V (1879) Ueber das unicorneale Tracheaten- und speziell das Arachnoideen-und Myriopoden-Auge. Arch Mikrosk Anat Entwicklungsmech 17:58–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Grenacher H (1880) Ueber die Augen einiger Myriapoden. Arch Mikrosk Anat Entwicklungsmech 18:415–467

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallberg E, Nilsson HL, Elofsson RE (1980) Classification of amphipod compound eyes — the fine structure of the ommatidial units (Crustacea, Amphipoda). Zoomorphologie 94:279–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanström B (1934) Bemerkungen über das Komplexauge der Scutigeriden. Lunds Univ Arsskr Avd 30 (2):1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanström B (1940) Inkretorische Organe, Sinnesorgane und Nervensystem des Kopfes einiger niederer Insektenordnungen. K svenska Vetenskapsakad Handl 18(8):1–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemenway J (1900) The structure of the eye of Scutigera (Cermatia) forceps. Biol Bull 1:205–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse R (1901) Untersuchungen über die Organe der Lichtempfindung bei niederen Thieren. VII. Von der Arthropoden-Augen. Z Wiss Zool 70:347–473

    Google Scholar 

  • Heymons R (1901) Die Entwicklungsgeschichte der Scolopender. Zoologica 33:1–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Joly R (1969) Sur l'ultrastructure de l'oeil de Lithobius forficatus L. (Myriapoda, Chilopoda). CR Acad Sci Paris 268:3180–3182

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinzelbach R (1971) Morphologische Befunde an Fächerflüglern und ihre phylogenetische Bedeutung. Zoologica 41:1–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoll HJ (1974) Untersuchungen zur Entwicklungsgeschichte von Scutigera coleoptrata L. (Chilopoda). Zool Jahrb Abt Anat Ontog Tiere 92:47–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraus O (1974) On the morphology of palaeozoic diplopods. Symp Zool Soc London 32:13–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller HLH (1924) Untersuchungen zur Biologie der Diplopoden. I. Die Lichtreaktionen von Ophyiulus fallax und Polydesmus complanatus. Zool Jahrb Abt Anat Ontog Tiere 40:400–488

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulus HF (1972) Zum Feinbau der Komplexaugen einiger Collembolen. Eine vergleichend-anatomische Untersuchung (Insecta, Entognatha). Zool Jahrb Abt Anat Ontog Tiere 89:1–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulus HF (1974) Die phylogenetische Bedeutung der Ommatidien der apterygoten Insekten (Collembola, Archaeognatha, Zygentoma). Pedobiologia 14:123–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulus HF (1975) The compound eyes of apterygote insects. In: Horridge GA (ed) The compound eye and vision of insects. Oxford, Clarendon Press, pp 3–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulus HF, Schmidt M (1978) Evolutionswege zum Larvalauge der Insekten. I. Die Stemmata der Trichoptera und Lepidoptera. Z Zool Syst Evolutionsforsch 16:188–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulus HF (1979) Eye structure and the monophyly of the Arthropoda. In: Gupta AP (ed) Arthropod phylogeny. New York, van Nostrand Reinhold Company, pp 299–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters DS, Gutmann WF (1971) Über die Lesrichtung von Merkmals-und Konstruktionsreihen. Z Zool Syst Evolutionsforsch 9:237–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Plate L (1924) Allgemeine Zoologie und Abstammungslehre. II. Die Sinnesorgane der Tiere Jena, Gustav Fischer, pp 537–545

  • Schömann K (1956) Zur Biologie von Polyxenus lagurus (L., 1758). Zool Jahrb Abt Anat Ontog Tiere 84:195–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Seifert G (1960) Die Entwicklung von Polyxenus lagurus L. (Diplopoda, Pselaphognatha). Zool Jahrb Abt Anat Ontog Tiere 78:257–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Siewing R (1960) Zum Problem der Polyphylie der Arthropoda. Z Wiss Zool 164:238–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Spurr AR (1969) A low viscosity epoxy-resin embedding medium for electron-microscopy. J Ultrastr Res 26:31–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiegs OW, Manton SM (1958) The evolution of the Arthropoda. Biol Rev 33:255–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhoeff KW (1901) Über die Coxalsäcke der Diplopoden und die phylogenetische Bedeutung der Colobognathen. Zool Anz 24:601–604

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhoeff KW (1928–1932) Diplopoda. In: Bronn HG (ed) Klassen und Ordnungen des Tier-Reichs. 5 (II 2). Leipzig, Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, pp 1073–2084

    Google Scholar 

  • Wachmann E (1972a) Das Auge des Hühnerflohs Ceratophyllus gallinae (Siphonaptera). Z Morphol Oekol Tiere 73:315–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Wachmann E (1972b) Zum Feinbau des Komplexauges von Stylops spec. (Insecta, Strepsiptera). Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat 123:411–424

    Google Scholar 

  • Werringloer A (1932) Die Sehorgane und Sehzentren der Dorylinae nebst Untersuchungen über die Facettenaugen der Formicidae. Z Wiss Zool 141:432–524

    Google Scholar 

  • Willem V (1892) Les ocelles de Lithobius et de Polyxenus. Bull Seanc Soc R Malac Belg 27:69–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Wundrig A (1936) Die Sehorgane der Mallophagen, nebst vergleichenden Untersuchungen an Lioceliden und Anopluren. Zool Jahrb Abt Anat Ontog Tiere 62:45–110

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spies, T. Structure and phylogenetic interpretation of diplopod eyes (Diplopoda). Zoomorphology 98, 241–260 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00312053

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00312053

Keywords

Navigation