Abstract
Cytological analysis of the thelytokous soft-scale insects Coccus hesperidum L. (2n=14) and Saissetia coffeae (Walker) (2n=16) revealed that while in both “species” the chromosomes did not pair during prophase I, meiosis consisted of two divisions, the chromosome number was reduced, and diploidy was restored by the fusion of the female pronucleus with the polar nucleus II. The difficulty of trying to classify this type of thelytoky as either automictic or apomictic led to the proposal that a new criterion and new terms be used to classify thelytoky (and parthenogenesis). The new criterion is whether the number of chromosome elements present in the first (or only) metaphase of oogenesis is the same as that present in the oogonia (gonoid thelytoky) or different from it (agonoid thelytoky). The new criterion is superior to the existing criteria because it is unambiguous, and because it groups together forms with a similar tendency towards heterozygosity (or homozygosity). The possible evolution of the forms analyzed as well as the two other thelytokous forms of each “species” described by Thomsen (1927) are discussed. Another soft-scale insect, Physokermes hemicryphus Dalam, consisted of a diploid (2n=18) and a triploid (3n=27) form, in both of which the chromosomes also did not pair. Each of the three “species” contained a strain in which only a single nucleolus was present per cell. In C. hesperidum some strains with two nucleoli differed in the size of the nucleoli.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Asher, J.H. Jr., Nace, G.W.: The genetic structure and evolutionary fate of parthenogenetic amphibian populations as determined by Markovian analysis. Amer. Zool. 11, 381–393 (1971)
Atchley, W.R.: Biological variability in the parthenogenetic grasshopper Warramaba virgo (Key) and its sexual relatives. II. The western Australian taxa. Evolution (Lawrence, Kans.) 32, 375–388 (1978)
Bartlett, B.R., Ball, J.C.: The evolution of host suitability in a polyphagous parasite with special reference to the role of parasite egg encapsulation. Ann. entomol. Soc. Amer. 59, 42–45 (1966)
Chandra, H.S.: Inverse meiosis in triploid females of the mealy bug, Planococcus citri. Genetics 47, 1441–1454 (1962)
Christensen, B.: A comparative cytological investigation of the reproductive cycle of an amphimictic diploid and a parthenogenetic triploid form of Lumbricullus lineatus (O.F.M.) (Oligochaeta, Enchytraeidae). Chromosoma (Berl.) 11, 365–379 (1960)
Cuellar, O.: Reproduction and the mechanism of meiotic restitution in the parthenogenetic lizard Cnemidophorus uniparens. J. Morph. 133, 139–165 (1971)
Hughes-Schrader, S.: Cytology of coccids (Coccoidea: Homoptera). Advanc. Genet. 2, 127–203 (1948)
Koch, P., Pijnacker, L.P., Kreke, J.: DNA reduplication during meiotic prophase in the oocytes of Carausius morosus Br. (Insecta, Cheleutoptera). Chromosoma (Berl.) 36, 313–321 (1972)
Macgregor, H.C., Uzzell, T.M.: Gynogenesis in salamanders related to Ambystoma jeffersonianum. Science 143, 1043–1045 (1964)
Matthey, R.: Cytologie de la parthénogénèse chez Pycnoscelus surinamensis L. (Blattariae-Blaberidae-Panchlorinae). Rev. suisse Zool. 52, 1–109 (1945)
Narbel-Hofstetter, M.: Les altérations de la méiose chez les animaux parthénogénétiques. Protoplasmatologia 6, F2. Springer Wien: 1964
Neaves, W.B.: Adenosine deaminase phenotypes among sexual and parthenogenetic lizards in the genus Cnemidophorus (Teiidae). J. exp. Zool. 171, 175–184 (1969)
Nur, U.: Meiotic parthenogenesis and heterochromatization in a soft scale, Palvinaria hydrangeae (Coccoidea: Homoptera). Chromosoma (Berl.) 14, 123–139 (1963)
Nur, U.: Parthenogenesis in coccids (Homoptera). Amer. Zoologist 11, 301–308 (1971)
Nur, U.: Diploid arrhenotoky and automictic thelytoky in soft scale insects (Lecaniidae: Coccoidea: Homoptera). Chromosoma (Berl.) 39, 381–401 (1972)
Parker, E.D. Jr., Selander, R.K.: The organization of genetic diversity in the parthenogenetic lizard Cnemidophorus tesselatus. Genetics 84, 741–805 (1976)
Parker, E.D. Jr., Selander, R.K., Hudson, R.O., Lester, L.J.: Genetics diversity in colonizing parthenogenetic cockroaches. Evolution (Lawrence, Kans.) 31, 836–842 (1977)
Pijnacker, L.P.: The maturation divisions of the stick insect Carausius morosus Br. (Orthoptera, Phasmidae). Chromosoma (Berl.) 19, 99–112 (1966)
Pijnacker, L.P.: Automictic parthenogenesis in the stick insect Bacillus rossius Rossi (Cheleutoptera, Phasmidae). Genetica ('s-Gravenhage) 40, 393–399 (1969)
Reed, D.K., Hart, W.G., Ingle, S.J.: Laboratory rearing of brown soft scale and its hymenopterous parasites. Ann. entomol. Soc. Amer. 61, 1443–1446 (1969)
Rieger, R., Michaelis, A., Green, M.M.: A glossary of genetics and cytogenetics, 3rd edit. New York: Springer Verlag 1968
Scholl, H.: Die Oogenese einiger parthenogenetischer Orthocladiinen (Diptera). Chromosoma (Berl.) 11, 380–401 (1960)
Suomalainen, E.: Parthenogenesis in animals. Advanc. Genet. 3, 193–253 (1950)
Suomalainen, E., Saura, A., Lokki, J.: Evolution of parthenogenetic insects. Evol. Biol. 9, 209–257 (1976)
Tartof, K.D.: Redundant genes. Ann. Rev. Genet. 9, 355–385 (1975)
Thomsen, M.: Studien über die Parthenogenese bei einigen Cocciden und Aleurodiden. Z. Zellforsch. 5, 1–116 (1927)
Thomsen, M.: Sex determination in Lecanium. Trans. IVth Internat. Congr. Entomol. 2, 18–24 (1929)
Uzzell, T.: Meiotic mechanisms of naturally occurring unisexual vertebrates. Amer. Naturalist 104, 433–445 (1970)
Webb, G.C., White, M.J.D., Contreras, N., Cheney, J.: Cytogenetics of the parthenogenetic grasshopper Warramaba (formerly Moraba) virgo and its bisexual relatives. IV. Chromosome banding studies. Chromosoma (Berl.) 67, 309–339 (1978)
White, M.J.D.: Animal cytology and evolution, 3rd edit. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press 1973
White, M.J.D.: Modes of speciation. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman, 1978
Williams, G.C.: Sex and evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press 1975
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nur, U. Gonoid thelytoky in soft scale insects (Coccidae: Homoptera). Chromosoma 72, 89–104 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00286431
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00286431