Summary
A novel column cellulose hydrolysis reactor with constant enzyme recycling was operated under various conditions to determine the effects of retention time, temperature, cellulase concentration and exogenously added cellobiase on the concentration of the product stream and the productivities of the reactor. Short term (7 days) hydrolysis was best at 42°C while longer term (14 days) hydrolysis was better at 37°C. A retention time of 11 h and reactor cellulase concentration of 30 filter paper units per gram of cellulose gave the best compromise for efficient operation by minimizing product inhibition, maximizing product concentration and minimizing enzyme consumption. The addition of cellobiase to the reactor increased cellulose hydrolysis and raised the proportion of monomeric sugars in the hydrolysate. Continuous cellulose hydrolyses were maintained for 7 and 14 days at 42°C and 37°C, respectively, resulting in volumetric productivities of 6.82 and 4.84 g/l/h and average sugar concentrations of 7.3% and 6.0% (w/v), respectively. Greater than 95% (w/w) of the sugars produced were in the monomeric state. Average cellulase used for the two runs were 8.4 and 5.3 filter paper units per gram of sugar produced, respectively.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alfani F, Cantarella M, Scardi V (1983) Use of a membrane reactor for studying enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. J Membrane Sci 16: 407–416
Coughlan MP (1985) The properties of fungal and bacterial cellulases with comment on their production and application. In: Russel GE (ed) Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Reviews, vol III, Intercept, Ponteland, Newcastle, pp 39–109
Ghose TK (1976) Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. Patent No. 3642580 USA
Gusakov AV, Nadzhemi B, Sinitsyn AP, Klesov AA (1984) Comparison of the effectiveness of the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose in Laboratory setups of various types. Appl Biochem Microbiol 20: 44–51
Henley RG, Yang RYK, Greenfield PF (1980) Enzymatic saccharification of cellulose in membrane reactors. Enzyme Microb Technol 2: 206–208
Ladisch MR, Lin KW, Voloch M, Tsao GT (1983) Process considerations in the enzymatic hydrolysis of biomass. Enzyme Microb Technol 5: 82–102
Mandels M, Andreotti R, Roche C (1976) Measurement of saccharifying cellulose. Biotechnol Bioeng Symp 6: 2–34
Mandels M, Kostick J, Parizek R (1971) The use of adsorbed cellulase in the continuous conversion of cellulose to glucose. J Polymer Sci Part C No 36: 445–459
Miller GL (1959) Use of dinitrosalicylic reagent for the determination of reducing sugars. Anal Chem 31: 426–428
Morisset WML, Khan AW (1984) Relation between filter paper activity and saccharifying ability of a Trichoderma cellulase system. Biotechnol Lett 6: 375–378
Nelson N (1944) A photometric adaptation of the Somogyi method for the determination of glucose. J Biol Chem 153: 375–380
Ohlson I, Tragardh G, Hahn-Hagerdal B (1984) Enzymatic hydrolysis of sodium-hydroxide-pretreated sallow in an ultrafiltration membrane reactor. Biotechnol Bioeng 26: 647–653
Sandhya S, Joshi SR, Swaminathan T (1984) Bioconversion of cellulosic wastes — an appraisal of processes and potential. J Scient Ind Res 43: 452–458
Somogyi M (1952) Notes on sugar determination. J Biol Chem 195: 19–23
Tan LUL, Yu EKC, Campbell N, Saddler JN (1986a) Column cellulose hydrolysis reactor: an efficient cellulose hydrolysis reactor with continuous cellulase recycling. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 25: 250–255
Tan LUL, Yu EKC, Mayers P, Saddler JN (1986b) Column cellulose hydrolysis reactor: cellulase adsorption profile. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 25: 256–261
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tan, L.U.L., Yu, E.K.C., Mayers, P. et al. Column cellulose hydrolysis reactor: the effect of retention time, temperature, cellulase concentration and exogenously added cellobiase on the overall process. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 26, 21–27 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00282144
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00282144