Skip to main content
Log in

The plastome of Citrus. Physical map, variation among Citrus cultivars and species and comparison with related genera

  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A physical plastome map was constructed for Citrus aurantium, and the plastomes of species and cultivars of Citrus and of two Citrus relatives were analysed by Southern blot-hybridisation of labelled total tobacco cpDNA to digests of total Citrus DNA. A resemblance was found between the plastomes of cultivars of C. limon (lemon), C. sinensis (orange), C. aurantium (sour orange), C. paradisii (grapefruit) and C. grandis (pomello). The plastomes of other Citrus types such as mandarin (C. reticulata) and citron (C. medico) differed from each other as well as from the plastomes of the aforementioned group. The plastomes of Poncirus trifoliata and Microcitrus sp. are distinct from each other as well as from the Citrus types.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barret MC, Rhodes AM (1976) A numerical taxonomic study of affinity relationships in cultivated Citrus and its close relatives. Syst Bot 1:105–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Hayyim G, Shani A, Vardi A (1982) Evaluation of isozyme systems in Citrus to facilitate identification of fusion products. Theor Appl Genet 64:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Berthou F, Mathieu C, Vedel F (1983) Chloroplast and mitochondrial DNA variation as indication of phylogenetic relationships in the genus Coffee L. Theor Appl Genet 65:77–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Bisaro D, Siegel A (1980) Sequence homology between chloroplast DNAs from several higher plants. Plant Physiol 65:234–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohnert MJ, Loffelharht W (1982) Cyanelle DNA from Cyanophora paradoxa exist in two forms due to intramolecular recombination. FEBS Lett 150:403–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer TA (1984) The chloroplast genome: its nature and role in development. In: Baker NR, Barber B (eds) Chloroplast biogenesis. Elsevier Amsterdam, pp 30–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Fluhr R (1983) Molecular genetics of the Nicotiana tabacum chloroplast. PhD Thesis Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot

    Google Scholar 

  • Fluhr R, Aviv D, Edelman M, Galun E (1983) Cybrids containing mixed and sorted-out chloroplasts following interspecific somatic fusions in Nicotiana. Theor Appl Genet 65:289–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel R, Scowcroft WR, Whitfeld PR (1979) Chloroplast DNA variation in isonuclear male-sterile lines of Nicotiana. Mol Gen Genet 169:129–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Galun E, Aviv D (1986) Organelle transfer. In: Weissbach A, Weissbach H (eds) Methods in enzymology, vol 118. Academic Press, New York, pp 595–611

    Google Scholar 

  • Maniatis T, Fritsch EF, Sambrook J (1982) Molecular cloning. Cold Spring Harbor NY, pp 100–112

  • McIntosh L, Poulsen C, Bogorad L (1980) Chloroplast gene sequence for the large subunit of ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase of maize. Nature 288:556–560

    Google Scholar 

  • Miami T, Kishima Y, Sugiura M, Kinoshita T (1984) Chloroplast DNA diversity in the cytoplasms of sugar beet and its related species. Plant Sci Lett 231–235

  • Palmer JD (1983) Chloroplast DNA exist in two orientations. Nature 301:92–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer JD, Thompson WF (1981) Rearrangements in the chloroplast genomes of mung bean and pea. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:5533–5537

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer JD, Singh GP, Pillay DTN (1983) Structure and sequence evolution of three legume chloroplast DNAs. Mol Gen Genet 190:13–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer JD, Zamir D (1982) Chloroplast DNA evolution and phylogenetic relationships in Lycopersicon. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 79:5006–5010

    Google Scholar 

  • Perl-Treves R, Galun E (1985) The Cucumis plastome: physical map, intrageneric variation and phylogenetic relationships. Theor Appl Genet 71:417–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes PR, Zhu YS, Kung SD (1981) Nicotiana chloroplast genome. 1. Chloroplast DNA diversity. Mol Gen Genet 182:106–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Soost RK (1964) Self-incompatibility in Citrus grandis (Linn.) Osbeck. Proc Am Soc Hortic Sci 84:137–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern DB, Lonsdale DM (1982) Mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes of maize have a 12-kilobase DNA sequence in common. Nature 299:698–702

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern DB, Palmer JD (1984) Extensive and widespread homologies between mitochondrial DNA and chloroplast DNA in plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81:1946–1950

    Google Scholar 

  • Swingle WT (1967) The botany of Citrus and its wild relatives. In: Reuther W, Webber MJ, Batchelor LD (eds) The Citrus industry. University of California, pp 190–430

  • Tanaka T (1969) Misunderstanding with regards Citrus classification and nomenclature. Bull Univ Osaka, Ser B 21:139–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmis JN, Scott NS (1983) Sequence homology between spinach nuclear and chloroplast genomes. Nature 305:65–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Vardi A, Spiegel-Roy P (1978) Taxonomy, breeding and genetics. Proc Int Soc Citricult 51–57

  • Vardi A, Spiegel-Roy P, Galun E (1982) Plant regeneration from Citrus protoplasts: variability in methodological requirements among cultivars and species. Theor Appl Genet 62:171–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahl GM, Stern M, Stark GR (1979) Efficient transfer of large DNA fragments from agarose gels to diazobenzylomethylpaper and rapid hybridization using dextran sulphate. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 79:2264–2267

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by R. Hagemann

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Green, R.M., Vardi, A. & Galun, E. The plastome of Citrus. Physical map, variation among Citrus cultivars and species and comparison with related genera. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 72, 170–177 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00266989

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00266989

Key words

Navigation