Abstract
Entrapment is defined and distinguished from related law enforcement practices. The subjective test of entrapment formulated by the Supreme Court and the objective test proposed by critics are discussed and evaluated. The argument is advanced that entrapment is a morally unjustifiable practice which is inconsistent with the rights of citizens in a democratic society. Guidelines are proposed for governing police conduct in potential entrapment situations and suggestions made regarding ways these guidelines might be implemented.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The authors wish to thank the following individuals for helpful comments on an earlier draft of this paper: Joseph A. Canale; Edward W. Chandler; Gary T. Marx; and Eugene L. Shapiro.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stitt, B.G., James, G.G. Entrapment and the entrapment defense: Dilemmas for a democratic society. Law Philos 3, 111–131 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00211226
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00211226