Abstract
In a theoretical first part we attempt to articulate the notions of concession, refutation and negation for monological linguistic activity, on the basis among other things of Mœschler's work on conversation. We distinguish the illocutionary act of refutation and the complex intervention of refutation, concession-invention, concession-repetition and concession-quotation. In a second part we analyze the place and role of (descriptive) negation in counter-argumentative texts written by 8- to 12-year-old pupils and adults in an artificial situation. We consider phenomena observed by certain “contradictory” properties of negation in the context of the task in question: namely potential help in generating content by mechanisms of the argumentative law of negation extended to predicates, negation takes the risk polyphonically of argumentative drift. This may explain the fact that it is so rare.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anscombre, J.C., and O. Ducrot: 1983, L'argumentation dans la langue, Mardaga, Bruxelles.
Bereiter, C. and M. Scardamalia: 1982, ‘From Conversation to Composition: The Role of Instruction in a Developmental Process’, in R. Glaser (ed.), Advances in Instructional Psychology, Vol. 2, Lawrence Erlbaum Ass., Hillsdale, pp. 1–54.
Bereiter, C. and M. Scardamalia: 1987, The Psychology of Written Composition, Lawrence Erlbaum Ass., Hillsdale.
Brandt, P.-Y.: 1989, La justification par la négative dans l'argumentation enfantine Berne: Peter Lang.
Brassart, D.G.: 1987, Le développement des capacités discursives chez l' enfant de 8 á 12 ans: le discours argumentatif (étude didactique), Thése de doctorat, Université de Strasbourg, ronéo, 4 vol.
Brassart, D.G.: 1988, ‘La gestion des contre-arguments dans le texte argumentatif écrit chez les éléves de 8 á 12 ans et les adultes compétents’, European Journal of Psychology of Education IV (1), 51–69.
Brassart, D.G.: 1990, ‘Le développement des capacités discursives chez l'enfant de 8 á 12 ans: le discours argumentatif (étude didactique)’, Revue Française de Pédagogie 90, 31–41.
Brassart, D.G.: 1981, ‘Les débuts de la rédaction argumentative. Approche psycholinguistique et didactique’, in M. Fayol (ed.), La production d' écrits, Université de Bourgogne — CRDP, Dijon, pp. 95–122.
Dispaux, G.: 1984, La logique et le quotidien. Une analyse dialogique des mécanismes d'argumentation, Minuit, Paris.
Ducrot, O.: 1973, La preuve et le Dire, Langage et logique, Mame, Paris.
Ducrot, O.: 1980, Les échelles argumentatives, Minuit, Paris (revised reprint from O. Ducrot, 1973).
Ducrot, O. et al.: 1980, Les mots du discours, Minuit, Paris.
Grize, J.B.: 1990, Logique et langage, Ophrys, Paris.
Kerbrat-Orrechioni, C.: 1986, L'implicite, A. Colin, Paris.
Miéville, D.: 1989, ‘Lorsque la logique rencontre l'argumentation’, Argumentation 3 (1), 45–57.
Mœschler, J.: 1982, Dire et contredire, Pragmatique de la négation et acte de réfutation dans la conversation, Peter Lang, Berne.
Mœschler, J.: 1985, Argumentation et conversation. Eléments pour une analyse pragmatique du discours, Crédif-Hatier, Paris.
Roulet, E.: 1984, ‘Speech Acts, Discourse Structure, and Pragmatic Connectives’, Journal of Pragmatics 8, 31–47.
Roulet, E. et al.: 1985, L'articulation du discours en français contemporain, Peter Lang, Berne.
Scardamalia, M., C. Bereiter and B. Fillion: 1981, Writing for results: A Sourcebook of Consequential Composing Activities, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education Press, Ontario.
Scardamalia, M., C. Bereiter, and H. Goelman: 1982, ‘The Role of Production Factors in Writing Abilities’, in N. Nystrand (ed.), What Writers Know, Academic Press, New York, pp. 173–210.
Wason, P.C., and P.N. Johnson-Laird: 1972, Psychology of Reasoning: Structure and Content, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brassart, D.G. Negation, concession and refutation in counter-argumentative composition by pupils from 8 to 12 years old and adults. Argumentation 6, 77–98 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00154260
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00154260