Skip to main content
Log in

A Brunswik Lens Model of Dialectical Inquiring Systems

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous papers have introduced the idea of a Dialectical Inquiring System (DIS), i.e., an Information System which for any issue presents strong pro and con arguments. The previous papers showed how the DIS could be made scientifically operational in terms of Russell Ackoff's Behavioral Theory of Communication. In this paper we show how the DIS can be represented in terms of Egon Brunswik's Lens Model. The Brunswik Lens Model formulation is most appropriate for the design of Behavioral Science experiments. It also illuminates further properties of the DIS. We discuss both the use and current limitations of the model in terms of an example currently under experimental investigation. The paper, in effect, argues vigorously for a new methodology of science that is founded on anexplicit, systematic, andcontrolled use of conflict.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Ackoff, Russell L., ‘Towards a Behavioral Theory of Communicationrs’,Management Science 4 (1958) 218–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackoff, Russell L., ‘Towards a System of Systems Conceptsrs,’Management Science 17, No. 11 (July 1971) 661–671.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, T. C., and Becker, L. A., ‘Debriefing and Susceptibility to Subsequent Experimental Manipulationsrs’,Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2 (1966) 314–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunswik, Egon, ‘Representative Design and Probabilistic Theory in a Functional Psychology’,Psychological Review 62, No. 3 (1955) 193–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C. West, ‘The Artificiality of Sciencers’ (A review of H. A. Simon's book,The Sciences of the Artificial),Contemporary Psychology,15, No. 6 (June 1970).

  • Churchman, C. W. and Ackoff, Russell L., ‘An Experimental Measure of Personality’,Philosophy of Science 14 (1947) 304–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C. West,The Deisign of Inquiring Systems, Basic Books, New York, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C. West,Challenge to Reason, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C. West,Prediction and Optimal Decision: Philosophical Issues of a Science of Values, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C. West, ‘Rationalist Inquiring Systems,’ Internal Working Paper #29 (May 1965a), University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C. West, ‘Singerian Inquiring Systems,’ Internal Working Paper #122(October 1970b), University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C. W.,Theory of Experimental Inference, The Macmillan Company, New York, 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C. West, ‘On Whole Systems,’ Internal Working Paper #31 (May 1965b), Space Science Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, Paul K., ‘Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge,’ inAnalyses of Theories and Methods of Physics and Psychology, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. IV, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 1970, pp. 17–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, Paul K., ‘On the Improvement of the Sciences and Arts and the Possible Identity of the Twor,’ inBoston Studies in the Philosophy of Science (Robert S. Cohen and Marx W. Wartofsky, eds.), D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland, 1967, pp. 387–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, Paul K., ‘Problems of Empiricism,’ inBeyond the Edge of Certainty (ed. by Robert G. Colodny), Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1965, pp. 145–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, Paul K., ‘Problems of Empiricism, Part II,’ inThe Nature and Function of Scientific Theories (eded. by Robert G. Colodny), University of Pittsburgh Press, 1970b, pp. 275–354.

  • Hammond, Kenneth R.et al., ‘Cognitive Conflict between Persons: Application of the “Lens Model” Paradigm,’Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2 (1960) 343–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, Kenneth R., ‘Probabilistic Functioning and the Clinical Methodrs,’Psychological Review 62, No. 4 (1955) 255–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, Kenneth R., Wilkins, M. M., and Todd, F. J., ‘A Research Paradigm for the Study of Interpersonal Learning,’Psychological Bulletin 65, No. 4 (1966)222–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, N. R., ‘Observation and Interpretation,’ inPhilosophy of Science Today (ed. by Sidney Morgenbesser), Basic Books, New York, 1967, pp. 89–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmer, Olaf and Rescher, Nicholas, ‘On the Epistemology of the Inexact Sciences,’Management Science 6 (October 1959) 25–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogarth, Robin M. and Einhorn, Hillel J., ‘An Examination of the Mathematical Formulation of the Lens Model in Judgmental Research,’ unpublished manuscript,University of Chicago, 1971.

  • Hursch, Carolyn J., Hammond, K. R., and Hursch, J. L., ‘Some Methodological Considerations on Multiple-Cue Probability Studies,’Psychological Review 71, No. 1 (1964) 42–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Thomas,The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago, 1962.

  • Luce, R. D. and Raiffa, H.,Games and Decisions, Wiley, New York, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, Richard O., ‘A Dialectical Approach to Strategic Planning,’Management Science 15, No. 8 (April 1969), pp. B-403-B-414.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNemar, Quinn,Psychological Statistics, Wiley, New York, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitroff, Ian I., Betz, Frederick, and Mason, Richard O., ‘A Mathematical Model of Churchmanian Inquiring Systems With Special Reference to Popper's Measures For The Severity of Tests,’Theory and Decision 1 (1970) 155–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitroff, Ian I., ‘A Communication Model of Dialectical Inquiring Systems - A Strategy for Strategic Planning,’Management Science 17, No. 10 (June 1971a), pp. B-634-B-648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitroff, Ian I. and Betz, Frederick, ‘Dialectical Decision Theory: A Meta-Theory of Decision Making,’Management Science, to appear, 1971b.

  • Mitroff, Ian I., ‘Epistemology as a Basis for Building a Generalized Model of General Policy-Sciences Models,’Management Science, special issue on ‘The Philosophy of Science of Management Science,’ to appear, 1971c.

  • Mitroff, Ian I., ‘On the Methodology of the Holistic Experiment,’Management Science, to appear, 1971d.

  • Mitroff, Ian I. and Williams, James, ‘Methodologies in Search of Problems,’ paper submitted toJournal American Society for Information Science, 1972a.

  • Mitroff, Ian I. and Sagasti, Francisco, ‘A Systems Approach for the Analyses and Design of Stimuli, Responses, and Experiments,’ paper submitted toPhilosophy of the Social Sciences, 1972b.

  • Mitroff, Ian I., ‘Systems, Inquiry, and the Meanings of Falsification,’ paper submitted toPhilosophy of Science, 1972c.

  • Popper, Karl,Conjectures and Refutations, Harper, New York, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Arnold, ‘The Relation of Theory and Method,’ inSociological Theories, Harper and Row, New York, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schank, R. L. and Goodman, C., ‘Reaction to Propaganda on Both Sides of a Controversial Issue,’Public Opinion Quarterly 3 (1938) 107–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sears, David, Freman, J. L., and O'Connor, E. F., ‘The Effects of Anticipated Debate and Commitment on the Polarization of Audience Opinion,’Public Opinion Quarterly 29 (1965) 615–627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, E. A.,Experience and Reflection, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, David A., ‘Conflict, Compromise, and Belief Change in a Decision-Making Task,’Journal of Conflict Resolution 12, No. 2 (June 1968), 215–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, Ledyord R., ‘A Suggested Alternative Formulation in the Developments by Hursch, Hammond, and Hursch, and by Hammond, Hursch, and Todd,’Psychological Review 71, No. 6 (1964) 528–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Merle,Psychology and the Philosophy of Science, Appelton-Century, New York, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turoff, Murray, ‘Delphi Conferencing,’ Technical Memorandum TM-125, Office of the Assistant Director for Resource Analysis, U.S. Govt. (March, 1971).

  • Ziman, John,Public Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, 1968.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mitroff, I.I. A Brunswik Lens Model of Dialectical Inquiring Systems. Theor Decis 5, 45–67 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00140300

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00140300

Keywords

Navigation