Skip to main content
Log in

An alternative logical framework for dialectical reasoning in the social and policy sciences

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article provides a concise logical, and as a consequence conceptual, critique of dialectical reasoning and its place in planning and policy in the work of Richard O. Mason and lan I. Mitroff. Based on this critique, a construct called Strategic Forum is presented as an advance of the use of dialectical reasoning in the social and policy sciences. The place of Strategic Forum within group decision support systems is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Allison, G. T.: 1971, Essence of Decision, Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis, Little Brown, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braybrooke, David and Charles E. Lindbloom: 1963, Strategy of Design, Policy Evaluation as a Social Process, Free Press of Glencoe, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockriede, W. and D. Ehninger: 1960, ‘Toulmin on Argument: An Interpretation and Application’, The Quarterly of Speech 46, 44–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bui, Tung and Matthias Jarke: 1986, ‘Communications Requirements for Group Decision Support Systems’, Journal of Management Information Systems 11(4), 8–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C. West: 1971, The Design of Inquiring Systems, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeSanctis, Geraldine and R. Brent Gallupe: 1987, ‘A Foundation for the Study of Group Decision Support Systems’, Management Science 33(5), 589–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeSanctis, Geraldine and R. Brent Gallupe: 1985, ‘Group Decision Support Systems: A New Frontier’, Data Base, Winter, pp. 3–10.

  • Hegel, G. W. F.: 1966, Hegel's Phenomenology of Mind, trans. J. B. Ballie, Humanities Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. W. F.: 1969, Science of Logic, trans. A. V. Miller, Humanities Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, George P.: 1984, ‘Issues in the Design of Group Decision Support Systems’, MIS Quarterly, September, pp. 195–204.

  • Ketz, J. Edward and R. M. Sabre: 1988, ‘Information Systems and Information Forums’, working paper.

  • Malone, Thomas W., Kenneth R. Grant, Kum-Yew Lai, Ramana Rao, and David Rosenblitt: 1987, ‘Semistructured Messages Are Surprisingly Useful for Computer-Supported Coordination’, ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems 5(2), 115–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone, Thomas W., Kenneth R. Grant, Franklyn A. Turbak, Stephen A. Brobst, and Michael D. Cohen: 1987, ‘Intelligent Information-Sharing Systems’, Communications of the ACM 30(5), 390–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone, Thomas W., Joanne Yates, and Robert I. Benjamin: 1987, ‘Electronic Markets and Electronic Hierarchies’, Communications of the ACM 30(6), 484–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, Raymond E. and Charles Curtis Snow: 1978, Organization Strategy, Structure, and Process, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, Richard O.: 1969, ‘A Dialectical Approach to Strategic Planning’, Management Science 15, B403-B414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, R. O. and Ian I. Mitroff: 1981, Challenging Strategic Planning Assumptions, John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitroff, Ian I. and Murray Turoff: 1975, ‘Philosophical and Methodological Foundations of Delphi’, from The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications, edited by Harold A. Linstone and Murray Turoff, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, Massachusetts, pp. 17–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitroff, I. I., James R. Emshoff, and Ralph H. Kilmann: 1979, ‘Assumptional Analysis: A Methodology for Strategic Problem Solving’, Management Science 25, 583–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitroff, Ian I. and Richard O. Mason: 1982, ‘On the Structure of Dialectical Reasoning in the Social and Policy Sciences’, Theory and Decision 14, 331–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitroff, I. I., Richard O. Mason, and Vincent P. Barabba: 1982, ‘Policy as Argument - A Logic for Ill-Structured Decision Problems’, Management Science 12, 1391–1404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunamaker Jr., Jay F., Lynda M. Applegate, and Benn R. Konsynski: 1987, ‘Facilitating Group Creativity: Experience with a Group Decision Support System’, Journal of Management Information Systems 3(4), 5–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescher, Nicholas: 1976, Plausible Reasoning, Van Gorcum, Assen/Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescher, Nicholas and Ruth Manor: 1970, ‘On Inference from Inconsistent Premises’, Theory and Decision 1, 179–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabre, Ru Michael: 1989, ‘Completing the Square of Opposition’, Argumentation 3, 97–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabre, Ru Michael: 1987, ‘Extending the Antilogism’, Logique et Analyse, March–June, pp. 103–111.

  • Stefik, M., D. G. Bobrow, G. Foster, S. Lanning, and D. Tatar: 1987, ‘WYSIWIS Revised: Early Experiences with Multiuser Interfaces’, ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems 5(2), 147–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stefik, Mark, Gregg Foster, Daniel G. Bobrow, Kenneth Kahn, Stan Lanning, and Lucy Suchman: 1987, ‘Beyond the Chalkboard: Computer Support for Collaboration and Problem Solving in Meetings’, Communications of the ACM 30(1), 32–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, Stephen: 1958, The Uses of Argument, Cambridge University Press.

  • Toulmin, Stephen, Richard Rieke, and Allan Janik: 1979, An Introduction to Reasoning, Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turoff, Murray and R. S. Hiltz: 1982, ‘Computer Support for Group versus Individual Decisions’, IEEE Transactions on Communications 30(1), 82–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, Hugh J. and Houston H. Carr: 1987, ‘Organizing for Decision Support System Support: The End-User Services Alternative’, Journal of Management Information Systems 4(1), 83–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, Richard, Geraldine DeSanctis, and Marshall Scott Poole: 1988, ‘Using a GDSS to Facilitate Group Consensus: Some Intended and Unintended Consequences’, forthcoming, MIS Quarterly.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sabre, R.M. An alternative logical framework for dialectical reasoning in the social and policy sciences. Theor Decis 30, 187–211 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00132444

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00132444

Keywords

Navigation