Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Discourse analysis for a Legal Expert System

  • Published:
Computers and the Humanities Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper deals with discourse analysis, with specific reference to the Linguistic and Logic Based Legal Expert System, LEX. In the LEX project we concentrated on a few arbitrarily selected court decisions, extracted the case descriptions, and then added the necessary background knowledge to our prototype expert system to analyze the case descriptions and to deduce the answers to some juridical questions. In this paper we present and comment on a typical discourse representation structure for an accident description in the corpus we studied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bäuerle, Rainer. Ereignisse and Repräsentationen. LILOGReport 43. Stuttgart: IBM Deutschland, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bäuerle, Rainer, Franz Guenthner, Manfred Krifka, and Rolf Mayer. Zur Grammatik von Unfallbeschreibungen, SNSScript. Universität Tübingen, 1988.

  • Bläser, Brigitte, Hein Lehmann. “Ansätze für ein natiirlichsprachliches Juristisches Konsultationssystem.” In Neue Methoden im Recht. Ed. Fritjot Haft. To appear.

  • Guenthner, Franz. “From Sentences to Discourse: Some Aspects of the Computational Treatment of Language.” In Natural Language at the Computer. Ed. Albrecht Blaser. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, (1988), pp. 147–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guenthner, F., H. Lehmann, & W. Schoenfeld “A Theory for Knowledge Representation.” IBM Journal of Research and Development (1986), 30, 1,39–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Guentlmer, F., H. Lehmann, & W. Schoenfeld ℌA Theory forKnowledge Representation.ℍ IBM Journal of Researchand Development (1986), 30, 1, 39-56 (= SNS-Bericht-85-3, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, Hans. “A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representa tion.” In Formal Methods in the Study of Language. Eds. J. A. G. Groendijk, T. M. V. Janssen and M. B. J. Stokhof. University of Amsterdam: MC TRACT 135, 1981, pp. 277–324.

  • Kamp, Hans. “Discourse Representation Theory: What It Is and Where It Ought to Go.” In Natural Language at the Computer. Ed. Albrecht Blaser. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1988, pp. 84–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, Hubert. “The LEX Project — Concepts and Results.” In Natural Language at the Computer. Ed. Albrecht Blaser. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1988, pp. 112–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. “Bewegung and Kohärenz,” SNS-Bericht-87-21.

  • Mayer, R. “Spatial Coherence,” SNS-Bericht-88-31.

  • Zoeppritz, Magdalena. Syntax for German in the User Specialty Languages System. Sprache and Information, Band 9, Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. IBM Deutschland Gmbf, Wissenschaftliches Zentrum, DW-6900, Wilckensstr. -la, Heidelberg, Germany

    Hubert Lehmann

  2. Centrum fur Informationsverarbeitende Systeme, Universität Munchen, Leopoldstr. 139, D W-8000, Munchen, Germany

    Franz Guenthner

Authors
  1. Hubert Lehmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Franz Guenthner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Hubert Lehmann is researcher in Computational Linguistics at the Science Center of IBM Germany.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lehmann, H., Guenthner, F. Discourse analysis for a Legal Expert System. Comput Hum 25, 81–92 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00124145

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00124145

Key Words

Search

Navigation