Skip to main content
Log in

Electoral equilibria with restricted strategies

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We construct a spatial election model in which candidates inherit initial positions in the strategy space, presumably from previous political activity, and they are restricted to strategies close to their initial positions. We establish sufficient conditions for the existence of an equilibrium. The equilibrium need not entail an expectation of a zero plurality for each candidate. We then apply this model to a sequence of elections in which a series of opposition candidates challenge incumbents. Given certain regularity conditions, the result will be an apparent incumbency advantage, corresponding to that observed in recent congressional elections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Abramowitz, A.I. (1980). A comparison of voting for U.S. senator and representative in 1978. American Political Science Review 74(3): 633–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aranson, P.H., Hinich, M.J., and Ordeshook, P.C. (1974). Election goals and strategies: Equivalent and nonequivalent candidate objectives. American Political Science Review 68(1): 135–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aranson, P.H., and Ordeshook, P.C. (1972). Spatial strategies for sequential elections. In R.G. Niemi and H.F. Weisberg (Eds.), Probability models of collective decision making, 298–331. Columbus, Ohio: Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Born, R. (1979). Generational replacement and the growth of incumbent safety margins in the U.S. House. American Political Science Review 73(3): 811–817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brams, S.J., and Straffin, P.D. Jr. (1982). The Entry problem in a political race. In P.C. Ordeshook and K.A. Shepsle (Eds.), Political equilibrium, 181–196. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, W.D. (1974). Communications. American Political Science Review 68(1): 207–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrill, C.W. (1972). Measure, integration, and probability. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L., and Matthews, S. (1980). Constrained Plott equilibria, directional equilibria and global cycling sets. Review of Economic Studies 47(5): 975–986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J.S. (1972). The positions of political parties in elections. In R.G. Niemi and H.F. Weisberg (Eds.), Probability models of collective decision making, 332–357. Columbus, Ohio: Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collie, M.P. (1981). Incumbency, electoral safety, and turnover in the House of Representatives. American Political Science Review 75(1): 119–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comaner, W.S. (1976). The median voter rule and the theory of political choice. Journal of Public Economics 5(1–2): 169–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coughlin, P., and Nitzan, S. (1981a). Electoral outcomes with probabilistic voting and Nash social welfare maxima. Journal of Public Economics 15(1): 113–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coughlin, P., and Nitzan, S. (1981b). Directional and local electoral equilibria with probabilistic voting. Journal of Economic Theory 24(2): 226–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cover, A.D. (1977). One good term deserves another: The advantage of incumbency in congressional elections. American Journal of Political Science 21(3): 523–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, O.A., and Hinich, M.J. (1972). Spatial competition under constrained choice. In R.G. Niemi and H.F. Weisberg (Eds.), Probability models of collective decision making, 358–377. Columbus, Ohio: Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, O.A., Hinich, M.J., and Ordeshook, P.C. (1970). An expository development of a mathematical model of the electoral process. American Political Science Review 64(2): 426–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzau, A.T., and Kats, A. (1977). Expected plurality voting equilibrium and social choice functions. Review of Economic Studies 44(2): 227–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, R.S. (1972). Malapportionment, gerrymandering, and party fortunes in congressional elections. American Political Science Review 64(4): 1234–1255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferejohn, J.A. (1977). On the decline of competition in congressional elections. American Political Science Review 71(1): 166–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiorina, M.P. (1977). The case of the vanishing marginals: The bureaucracy did it. American Political Science Review 71(1): 177–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinckley, B. (1980a). The American voter in congressional elections. American Political Science Review 74(3): 641–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinckley, B. (1980b). House reelections and Senate defeats: The role of the challenger. British Journal of Political Science 10(4): 441–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinich, M.J. (1977). Equilibrium in spatial voting: The median voter result is an artifact. Journal of Economic Theory 16(2): 208–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinich, M.J., Ledyard, J.O., and Ordeshook, P.C. (1972). Nonvoting and the existence of equilibrium under majority rule. Journal of Economic Theory 4(2): 144–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinich, M.J., Ledyard, J.O., and Ordeshook, P.C. (1973). A theory of electoral equilibrium: A spatial analysis based on the theory of games. Journal of Politics 35(1): 154–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinich, M.J., and Ordeshook, P.C. (1969). Abstention and equilibrium in the electoral process. Public Choice 7 (Spring): 81–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Intriligator, M.D. (1973). A probabilistic model of social choice. Review of Economic Studies 40(4): 553–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, G.H., and Klevorick, A.K. (1974). Existence of a ‘local’ co-operative equilibrium in a class of voting games. Review of Economic Studies 41(4): 543–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R.D. (1959). Individual choice behavior. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, T.E. (1978). Unsafe at any margin; Interpreting congressional elections. Washington: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, T.E., and Wolfinger, R.E. (1980). Candidates and parties in congressional elections. American Political Science Review 74(3): 617–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, S.A. (1979). A simple direction model of electoral competition. Public Choice 34(2): 141–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayhew, D.R. (1974). Congressional elections: The case of the vanishing marginals. Polity 6(3): 295–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey, R.D. (1975). Policy related voting and electoral equilibrium. Econometrica 43(5–6): 815–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plott, C.R. (1967). A notion of equilibrium and its possibility under majority rule. American Economic Review 57(4): 787–806.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riker, W. (1962). The theory of political coalitions. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riker, W., and Ordeshook, P.C. (1973). An introduction to positive political theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufte, E.R. (1973). The relationship between seats and votes in twoparty systems. American Political Science Review 67(2): 540–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uslander, E.M. (1981). The case of the vanishing liberal senators: The house did it. British Journal of Political Science 11(1): 105–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittman, D.A. (1973). Parties as utility maximizers. American Political Science Review 67(2): 490–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The helpful comments of Peter Aranson and three anonymous referees are gratefully acknowledged. Errors remain the author's responsibility.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Samuelson, L. Electoral equilibria with restricted strategies. Public Choice 43, 307–327 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00118939

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00118939

Keywords

Navigation