Skip to main content
Log in

Measurement of biogenic sulfur emissions from soils and vegetation: Application of dynamic enclosure methods with Natusch filter and GC/FPD analysis

  • Published:
Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Emission rates of reduced sulfur gases from vegetation and soils were measured in various regions of the United States during the summer of 1985. The predominant sulfur gases emitted were hydrogen sulfide, carbonyl sulfide and dimethylsulfide. Typically, vegetative (forests, crops, etc.) emission fluxes varied between approximately 10 and 60 ng S m-2 min-1. Biogenic sulfur fluxes from mollisol and histisol soils averaged 15 and 217 ng S m-2 min-1, respectively. Salt water marsh fluxes with a geometric mean of 293 ng S m-2 min-1 were the highest measured. These biogenic sulfur fluxes are somewhat lower than those measured during the SURE study at some of the same sites. The natural sulfur emission fluxes reported herein together with those data included in the two accompanying manuscripts provide the basis for developing a national inventory of reduced sulfur emissions from soils, crops and trees. When combined these data also will provide a foundation for deriving uncertainty limits associated with these flux estimates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, D., Farwell, S., Robinson, E., and Pack, M. 1980, Biogenic sulfur emissions in the SURE region, EPRI Report WA-1516, Palo Alto, CA.

  • Adams, D., Farwell, S., Robinson, E., Pack, M., and Bamesberger, L., 1981, Biogenic sulfur source strengths.Environ. Sci. Tech. 15, 1494–1498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aneja, V., Overton, J., Cupitt, L., Durham, J., and Wilson, W., 1979, Direct measurements of emission rates of some atmospheric biogenic sulfur compounds,Tellus 31, 174–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aneja, V., Overton, J., and Aneja, A., 1981, Emission survey of biogenic sulfur flux from terrestrial surfaces,J. Air. Pollut. Assoc. 31, 256–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, H., Cary, J., Bonelli, J., and Lodge, J., 1969, Fluorescence determination of sub-parts per billion hydrogen sulfide in the atmosphere,Anal. Chem. 41, 1856–1858.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K. A. and Bell, J. N. B., 1986, Vegetation—the missing sink in the global cycle of carbonyl sulphide (COS),Atmos. Environ. 20, 537–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, M. A., 1983, An experimental study of the fluxes of reduced sulfur gases from a salt water marsh, Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA; Coop Thesis 73; National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO.

  • Delmas, R. Baudet, J., Servant, J., and Baziard, Y., 1980, Emissions and concentrations of hydrogen sulfide in the air of the tropical forest of the Ivory Coast and of temperate regions in France,J. Geophys. Res. 85, 4463–4474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilts, S., 1985, Field studies of natural atmospheric sulfur gases. Part I: Biogenic sulfur emissions from trees. Part II: Boundary layer sulfur gas measurements in the Antarctic, M.S. Thesis, Washington State University, Pullman, WA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farwell, S., 1985, personal communication, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID.

  • Georgii, H. W., 1978, Large seale spatial and temporal distributions of sulfur compounds,Atmos. Environ. 12, 681–690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldan, P. D., Kuster, W. C., Albritton, D. L., and Fehsenfeld, F. C., 1987, The measurement of natural sulfur emissions from soils and vegetation: Three sites in the eastern United States revisited,J. Atmos. Chem. 5, 439–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, A., Marouliss, P., Wilner, L., and Bandy, A., 1981, Study of H2S emissions from a salt water marsh,Atmos. Environ. 15, 11–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M., Ingvorsen, K., and Jorgensen, B., 1978, Mechanisms of hydrogen sulfide release from coastal marine sediments to the atmosphere,Limnol. Oceanogr. 23, 68–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeschke, W., 1978, New methods for the analysis of SO2 and H2S in remote areas and their application to the atmosphere,Atmos. Environ. 12, 715–721.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeschke, W., and Herrmann, J., 1981, Measurements of H2S in the atmosphere,Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 10, 107–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovelock, J., Maggs, R., and Rasmussen, R., 1972, Atmospheric dimethyl sulfide and the natural sulfur cycle,Nature 237, 452.

    Google Scholar 

  • McTaggert, D. L., Adams, D. F., and Farwell, S. O., 1987, Measurement of biogenic sulfur emissions from soils and vegetation using dynamic enclosure methods: Total sulfur gas fluxes via MFC/FD/FPD determinations,J. Atmos. Chem. 5, 417–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Natusch, D., Konis, H., Axelrod, H., Teck, R., and Lodge, J., 1972, Sensitive method for measurement of atmospheric hydrogen sulfide,Anal. Chem. 44, 2067–2070.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steudler, P., and Peterson, B., 1985, Annual cycle of gaseous sulfur emissions from a New England Spartina alterniflora marsh,Atmos. Environ. 19, 1411–1416.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lamb, B., Westberg, H., Allwine, G. et al. Measurement of biogenic sulfur emissions from soils and vegetation: Application of dynamic enclosure methods with Natusch filter and GC/FPD analysis. J Atmos Chem 5, 469–491 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00113906

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00113906

Key words

Navigation