Abstract
Water storage is a driver for economic growth and often mentioned as a proxy for water security. Hydropower storage projects deliver multiple benefits contributing to water and energy security; however, the reservoir creation raises concerns about greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and puts in doubt how clean hydropower generation is. As storage becomes more relevant under climate change, adequate assessment is necessary to ensure projects’ sustainability. This study quantifies hydropower global median lifecycle greenhouse emissions at 23 gCO2e/kWh using the G-res Tool to estimate the net emission for 480 hydropower storage projects. This result is aligned with the IPCC estimates.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bakken TH, Modahl IS, Raadal HL, Bustos AA, Arnøy S (2016) Allocation of water consumption in multipurpose reservoirs. Water Policy 18(4):932–947
Benson D, Gain AK, Giupponi C (2020) Moving beyond water centricity? Conceptualizing integrated water resources management for implementing sustainable development goals. Sustain Sci 15(2):671–681
Berga L (2016) The role of hydropower in climate change mitigation and adaptation: a review. Engineering 2(3):313–318
Brown C, Lall U (2006) Water and economic development: the role of variability and a framework for resilience. In: Nat Resour Forum 30(4):306–317 (Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.)
Carbon Monitor (2021). https://carbonmonitor.org/. Accessed 6 Feb 2021
Chanudet V, Descloux S, Harby A, Sundt H, Hansen BH, Brakstad O, Serça D, Guerin F (2011) Gross CO2 and CH4 emissions from the Nam Ngum and Nam Leuk sub-tropical reservoirs in Lao PDR. Sci Total Environ 409:5382–5391
Climate Bonds Initiative (2019) Open for public consultation. The Hydropower Criteria. Climate Bonds Standard. https://www.climatebonds.net/hydropower. Accessed 6 Feb
Deemer BR, Harrison JA, Li S, Beaulieu JJ, DelSontro T, Barros N et al (2016) Greenhouse gas emissions from reservoir water surfaces: a new global synthesis. BioScience 66(11):949–964
DFID (Department of International Development) (2009) Water storage and hydropower: supporting growth, resilience, and low carbon development (A DFID evidence‐into‐action paper). Policy Booklet
European Commission (2020) Financing a Sustainable European Economy—taxonomy report: technical annex. https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/sustainable-finance-teg-taxonomy_en Accessed 6 Feb 2021
FAO (2017) The future of food and agriculture: trends and challenges. FAO, Rome
Fearnside PM, Pueyo S (2012) Greenhouse-gas emissions from tropical dams. Nat Clim Chang 2:382–384
Hallegatte S, Shah A, Lempert C, Brown C, Gill S (2012) Investment decision making under deep uncertainty: application to climate change. Policy Research Working Paper 6193. Washington, DC: World Bank
Hogeboom RJ, Knook L, Hoekstra AY (2018) The blue water footprint of the world’s artificial reservoirs for hydroelectricity, irrigation, residential and industrial water supply, flood protection, fishing and recreation. Adv Water Resour 113:285–294
ICOLD (International Commission on Large Dams) (2021) World register of dams. General synthesis. https://www.icold-cigb.org/GB/world_register/general_synthesis.asp. Accessed 6 Feb 2021
IEA (2019) World energy outlook 2019. https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2019. Accessed 6 Feb 2021
IHA (International Hydropower Association) (2010) GHG measurement guidelines for freshwater reservoirs: derived from: the UNESCO/IHA greenhouse gas emissions from freshwater reservoirs research project. International Hydropower Association, London
IHA (International Hydropower Association) (2010) Hydropower sustainability assessment protocol. International Hydropower Association, London
IHA (International Hydropower Association) (2018) Hydropower status report 2018: sector trends and insights. International Hydropower Association, London
IHA (International Hydropower Association) (2018) Hydropower sustainability guidelines. International Hydropower Association, London
IHA (International Hydropower Association) (2019) Hydropower sector climate resilience guide. International Hydropower Association, London
IHA (International Hydropower Association) (2020) Hydropower status report 2020. International Hydropower Association, London
IHA (International Hydropower Association) (2020) Hydropower sustainability environmental, social and governance gap analysis tool. International Hydropower Association, London
IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change. In: Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Farahani E, Kadner S, Seyboth K, Adler A, Baum I, Brunner S, Eickemeier P, Kriemann B, Savolainen J, Schlömer S, von Stechow C, Zwickel T, Minx JC (eds) Contribution of working group III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA
IPCC (2018) Summary for policymakers. In: Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pörtner H-O, Roberts D, Skea J, Shukla PR, Pirani A, Moufouma-Okia W, Péan C, Pidcock R, Connors S, Matthews JBR, Chen Y, Zhou X, Gomis MI, Lonnoy E, Maycock T, Tignor M, Waterfield T (eds) Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 32 pp
Landsvirkjun (2017) Theistareykir first geothermal power plant to undergo Geothermal Sustainability Assessment Protocol. https://www.landsvirkjun.com/company/mediacentre/news/news-read/theistareykir-first-geothermal-power-plant-to-undergo-gsap-sustainability-assessment. Accessed 6 Feb 2021
Lehner B, Reidy Liermann C, Revenga C, Vorosmarty C, Fekete B, Crouzet P, Doll P, Endejan M, Frenken K, Magome J, Nilsson C, Robertson JC, Rodel R, Sindorf N, Wisser D (2011) Global Reservoir and Dam Database, Version 1 (GRanDv1): Dams, Revision 01. Palisades, NY: NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC). https://doi.org/10.7927/H4N877QK. Accessed 6 Feb
Levasseur A, Mercier-Blais S, Prairie Y, Tremblay A, Turpin C (2021) Improving the accuracy of electricity carbon footprint: estimation of hydroelectric reservoir greenhouse gas emissions. Renewable Sustain Energy Rev 136:110433
Maeck A, Hofmann H, Lorke A (2014) Pumping methane out of aquatic sediments: ebullition forcing mechanisms in an impounded river. Biogeosciences 11:2925–2938
Mayor B, Rodríguez-Muñoz I, Villarroya F, Montero E, López-Gunn E (2017) The role of large and small scale hydropower for energy and water security in the Spanish Duero Basin. Sustainability 9(10):1807
Mekonnen MM, Hoekstra AY (2012) The blue water footprint of electricity from hydropower. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 16(1):179–187
Mendonça R, Kosten S, Sobek S, Barros N, Cole JJ, Tranvik L, Roland F (2012) Hydroelectric carbon sequestration. Nat Geosci 5:838–840
Milly PCD, Betancourt J, Falkenmark M, Hirsch RM, Kundzewicz ZW, Lettenmaier DP, Stouffer RJ (2008) Stationarity is dead: whither water management? Science 319:573–574
Patel S, Shakya C, Rai N (2020) Climate finance for hydropower: incentivising the low-carbon transition. http://pubs.iied.org/10203IIED. Accessed 10 Feb 2021
Pfister S, Scherer L, Buxmann K (2020) Water scarcity footprint of hydropower based on a seasonal approach-Global assessment with sensitivities of model assumptions tested on specific cases. Sci Total Environ 724:138188
Pokhrel Y, Felfelani F, Satoh Y, Boulange J, Burek P, Gädeke A, Wada Y (2021) Global terrestrial water storage and drought severity under climate change. Nat Clim Change 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-00972-w
Prairie YT, Alm J, Beaulieu J, Barros N, Battin T, Cole JJ, del Giorgio PA, DelSontro T, Guérin F, Harby A, Harrison J, Mercier-Blais S, Serça D, Sobek S, Vachon D (2018) Greenhouse gas emissions from freshwater reservoirs: what does the atmosphere see? Ecosystems 21:1058–1071. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-017-0198-9
Prairie Y, Alm J, Harby A, Mercier-Blais S, Nahas R (2017) The GHG Reservoir Tool (G-res) Technical documentation, UNESCO/IHA research project on the GHG status of freshwater reservoirs. Joint publication of the UNESCO Chair in Global Environmental Change and the International Hydropower Association
Prairie YT, Mercier-Blais S, Harrison JA, Soued C, del Giorgio PA, Harby A, Alm J, Chanudret V, Nahas R (2021) A new modelling framework to assess biogenic GHG emissions from reservoirs: the G-res Tool. Environ Model Softw 143(105117):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.105117
Ray PA, Brown CM (2015) Confronting climate uncertainty in water resources planning and project design: the decision tree framework. World Bank, Washington, DC
Sarawak (2021) Sustainability and CSR. https://www.sarawakenergy.com/what-we-do/sustainability-csr. Accessed 10 Feb 2021
Sanctuary M, Tropp H, Haller L (2007) Making water a part of economic development: the economic benefits of improved water management and services. Stockholm International Water Institute (SIWI), Sweden
Scherer L, Pfister S (2016) Global water footprint assessment of hydropower. Renew Energy 99:711–720
Thoradeniya B, Ranasinghe M, Wijesekera NTS (2007) Social and environmental impacts of a mini-hydro project on the Ma Oya Basin in Sri Lanka. In: International conference on small hydropower. Hydro Sri Lanka 22:24
Ubierna M, Alarcón A, Alberti J (2020) Modernización de centrales hidroeléctricas en América Latina y el Caribe: Identificación y priorización de necesidades de inversión. Nota Técnica. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo, Washington, DC
UN (United Nations) (2021) Goal 13: take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts. COVID-19 response. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/climate-change/. Accessed 10 Feb 2021
UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme) (2019) Emissions Gap Report 2019. https://www.unenvironment.org/resources/emissions-gap-report-2019. Accessed 10 Feb 2021
Wenjie L, Dawei W, Shengfa Y, Wei Y (2020) Three Gorges Project: benefits and challenges for shipping development in the upper Yangtze River. Int J Water Resour Dev. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2019.1698411
World Bank (2021) Resilience rating system: a methodology for building and tracking resilience to climate change. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/35039. Accessed 10 Feb 2021
World Commission on Dams (2000) Dams and development. A new framework for decision-making. The Report of the World Commission on Dams. London: Earthscan
Xiaocheng F, Tao T, Wanxiang J, Fengqing L, Naicheng W, Shuchan Z, Qinghua C (2008) Impacts of small hydropower plants on macroinvertebrate communities. Acta Ecol Sin 28(1):45–52
Zhao D, Liu J (2015) A new approach to assessing the water footprint of hydroelectric power based on allocation of water footprints among reservoir ecosystem services. Phys Chem Earth 79:40–46
Acknowledgements
This study was based on the previous work carried out by ex IHA staff members, Mathis Rogner and Emma Smith, under the funded UNESCO/IHA research project on the GHG status of freshwater reservoirs and published in the IHA Hydropower Status Report 2018 (IHA 2018b).
Declaration of Interest Statement
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this chapter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Annex
Annex
Distribution of the installed capacity of study dataset and IHA Global Hydropower Station database and expected values to perform Chi-Square test
Installed capacity | Study dataset | IHA database | Study dataset expected values | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
# Stations | # Stations | Distribution | # Stations | |
100 | 268 | 10,357 | 0.841006902 | 404 |
200 | 72 | 810 | 0.065773447 | 32 |
300 | 35 | 351 | 0.028501827 | 14 |
400 | 21 | 180 | 0.014616322 | 7 |
500 | 12 | 117 | 0.009500609 | 5 |
600 | 10 | 87 | 0.007064555 | 3 |
700 | 2 | 49 | 0.003978888 | 2 |
800 | 5 | 46 | 0.003735282 | 2 |
900 | 4 | 37 | 0.003004466 | 1 |
1000 | 1 | 41 | 0.003329273 | 2 |
1100 | 9 | 37 | 0.003004466 | 1 |
1200 | 2 | 41 | 0.003329273 | 2 |
1300 | 5 | 28 | 0.00227365 | 1 |
1400 | 5 | 14 | 0.001136825 | 1 |
1500 | 3 | 14 | 0.001136825 | 1 |
1600 | 2 | 9 | 0.000730816 | 0 |
1700 | 2 | 8 | 0.000649614 | 0 |
1800 | 1 | 8 | 0.000649614 | 0 |
1900 | 0 | 9 | 0.000730816 | 0 |
2000 | 0 | 7 | 0.000568413 | 0 |
2100 | 2 | 5 | 0.000406009 | 0 |
2200 | 1 | 4 | 0.000324807 | 0 |
2300 | 0 | 1 | 8.12018E−05 | 0 |
2400 | 3 | 8 | 0.000649614 | 0 |
2500 | 2 | 7 | 0.000568413 | 0 |
2600 | 0 | 3 | 0.000243605 | 0 |
2700 | 0 | 1 | 8.12018E−05 | 0 |
2800 | 1 | 2 | 0.000162404 | 0 |
2900 | 2 | 2 | 0.000162404 | 0 |
3000 | 0 | 4 | 0.000324807 | 0 |
>3000 | 10 | 28 | 0.00227365 | 1 |
Total | 480 | 12,315 | ||
Chi-Square test | 7.89169E−87 | |||
Distribution of climate zones of study dataset and GRanD database and expected values to perform Chi-Square test
Study dataset | GRanD database | Study dataset expected values | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Climate | # Stations | # Stations | Distribution | # Stations |
Boreal | 69 | 291 | 0.190445 | 91.4136 |
Temperate | 338 | 1056 | 0.691099 | 331.728 |
Subtropical | 30 | 46 | 0.030105 | 14.4503 |
Tropical | 43 | 135 | 0.088351 | 42.4084 |
Total | 480 | 1528 | ||
Chi-Square test p value | 5.5E−05 | |||
Distribution of surface area of study dataset and GRanD database and expected values to perform Chi-Square test
Study dataset | GRanD database | Study dataset expected values | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Surface area | # Stations | # Stations | Distribution | # Stations |
20 | 249 | 997 | 0.652486911 | 313.1937173 |
40 | 64 | 156 | 0.102094241 | 49.0052356 |
60 | 31 | 82 | 0.053664921 | 25.7591623 |
80 | 17 | 37 | 0.02421466 | 11.62303665 |
100 | 14 | 25 | 0.016361257 | 7.853403141 |
120 | 10 | 19 | 0.012434555 | 5.968586387 |
140 | 10 | 20 | 0.013089005 | 6.282722513 |
160 | 4 | 12 | 0.007853403 | 3.769633508 |
180 | 7 | 13 | 0.008507853 | 4.083769634 |
200 | 5 | 15 | 0.009816754 | 4.712041885 |
220 | 5 | 9 | 0.005890052 | 2.827225131 |
240 | 5 | 11 | 0.007198953 | 3.455497382 |
260 | 6 | 8 | 0.005235602 | 2.513089005 |
280 | 2 | 6 | 0.003926702 | 1.884816754 |
300 | 2 | 7 | 0.004581152 | 2.19895288 |
320 | 2 | 4 | 0.002617801 | 1.256544503 |
340 | 1 | 4 | 0.002617801 | 1.256544503 |
360 | 1 | 2 | 0.001308901 | 0.628272251 |
380 | 3 | 3 | 0.001963351 | 0.942408377 |
400 | 2 | 3 | 0.001963351 | 0.942408377 |
420 | 2 | 3 | 0.001963351 | 0.942408377 |
440 | 0 | 3 | 0.001963351 | 0.942408377 |
460 | 1 | 1 | 0.00065445 | 0.314136126 |
480 | 0 | 2 | 0.001308901 | 0.628272251 |
500 | 1 | 2 | 0.001308901 | 0.628272251 |
520 | 3 | 4 | 0.002617801 | 1.256544503 |
540 | 0 | 2 | 0.001308901 | 0.628272251 |
560 | 0 | 2 | 0.001308901 | 0.628272251 |
580 | 0 | 2 | 0.001308901 | 0.628272251 |
600 | 0 | 2 | 0.001308901 | 0.628272251 |
>600 | 33 | 72 | 0.047120419 | 22.61780105 |
Total | 480 | 1528 | ||
Chi-Square test | 0.000708537 | |||
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ubierna, M., Santos, C.D., Mercier-Blais, S. (2022). Water Security and Climate Change: Hydropower Reservoir Greenhouse Gas Emissions. In: Biswas, A.K., Tortajada, C. (eds) Water Security Under Climate Change. Water Resources Development and Management. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5493-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5493-0_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-5492-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-5493-0
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)