Skip to main content

Comparative Analysis of Optimum Capacity Allocation and Pricing in Power Market by Different Optimization Algorithms

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 817))

Abstract

The paper presents the optimum allocation of capacity and capacity pricing between two individual electricity markets, which are interconnected and have different designs. Among them, one market has energy-only market, whereas other has capacity-plus-energy market. Generation companies (GenCos) optimally allocate capacity in different markets in such a way that it maximizes their overall revenue. Similarly, independent system operator (ISO) purchases capacity and energy in such a way that it minimizes their purchase cost. Both these problems are stochastic and nonlinear optimization problems. It could not be solved by classical method. Therefore, three meta-heuristic optimization algorithms such as Dragonfly, Moth-flame, and Whale optimization algorithms are used to solve both problems. Furthermore, both problem solutions are illustrated by a numerical example and capacity allocation and capacity pricing results are compared with the literature. Additionally, the comparative analysis is done for the capacity price, GenCos’ revenue, and the ISO’s purchase cost by using above-mentioned algorithms under different market conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Gore, O., Vanadzina, E., Viljainen, S.: Linking the energy-only market and the energy-plus-capacity market. Util. Policy 38, 52–61 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Vasileva, E., Viljainen, S., Sulamaa, P., Kuleshov, D.: RES support in Russia: impact on capacity and electricity market prices. Renew. Ener. 76, 82–90 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bowring, J.: Capacity markets in PJM. Econ. Ener. Environ. Policy 2, 47–64 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ott, A.L.: Experience with PJM market operation, system design, and implementation. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 18, 528–534 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Thomas, S.: The Wholesale Electricity Market in Britain–1990-2001, Public Service International Research Unit. PSIRU), University of Greenwich, London (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bhagwat, P.C., de Vries, L.J., Hobbs, B.F.: Expert survey on capacity markets in the US: lessons for the EU. Util. Policy 38, 11–17 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Logan, D.M., Dean, P., Edward, F.: RPM Implementation Review (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cramton, P., Stoft, S.: A capacity market that makes sense. Electr. J. 18, 43–54 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rau, N.S.: The need for capacity markets in the deregulated electrical industry- a review. In: Power Engineering Society 1999 Winter Meeting, vol. 1, pp. 411–415. IEEE (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Anwar, A., Pota, H.: Optimum capacity allocation of DG units based on unbalanced three-phase optimal power flow. In: Power and Energy Society General Meeting, pp. 1–8. IEEE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Moradi, M.H., Abedini, M.: Optimal multi-distributed generation location and capacity by genetic algorithms. In: Power Engineering and Optimization Conference (PEOCO), 2010 4th International, pp. 440–444 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wang, Y., Wong, K.P., Chung, C.Y., Wen, F.S.: Determination of appropriate price level in installed capacity market. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 1, 127–132 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mirjalili, S.: Dragonfly algorithm: a new meta-heuristic optimization technique for solving single-objective, discrete, and multi-objective problems. Neural Comput. Appl. 27, 1053–1073 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mirjalili, S.: Moth-flame optimization algorithm: a novel nature-inspired heuristic paradigm. Knowl. Based Syst. 89, 228–249 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mirjalili, S., Lewis, A.: The whale optimization algorithm. Adv. Eng. Softw. 95, 51–67 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashok Parmar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Parmar, A., Darji, P. (2019). Comparative Analysis of Optimum Capacity Allocation and Pricing in Power Market by Different Optimization Algorithms. In: Bansal, J., Das, K., Nagar, A., Deep, K., Ojha, A. (eds) Soft Computing for Problem Solving. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 817. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1595-4_25

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics