Skip to main content

Pedagogy and the Second Person

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Over the past two decades, there has been gathering interest in the second-person perspective. It has been applied in ethics , philosophy of language , epistemology , and studies of social cognition. One source of this approach is Strawson , and another is Davidson , but I suggest that the seeds lie in Wittgenstein . A significant benefit of this approach is that it offers a way of avoiding the sceptical difficulties that arise when we limit our explication of human cognition and interaction to first- and third-person perspectives. There has been little discussion of the significance of the second-person perspective for educational theory, and I hope to address that in this paper. I will do so by reflecting on Wittgenstein’s references to teaching , training , and learning in his later work, especially in his attack on mentalism and individualism. It can seem that Wittgenstein’s way of introducing pedagogical moments treats those practices as cases of disciplining or forming an other—a first-to-third person interaction . But I argue that these cases are examples of shared, cooperative, and normative activities into which the child or novice is being welcomed. I thus seek to show that in his mentions of pedagogy, Wittgenstein ought to be seen as invoking and insisting on a second-person relation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Following convention, titles for Wittgenstein’s works are abbreviated (OC = On Certainty, PI = Philosophical Investigations, RFM = Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics, Z = Zettel), with section (§) or page number (p.), with full citation and initials (e.g., RFM) in the References.

  2. 2.

    The works most relevant are Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics (RFM), Philosophical Investigations (PI), and On Certainty (OC).

  3. 3.

    In fact, it would be easier to see Luntley’s position as a critique of Wittgenstein , a la Fodor and LePore (2007)—which is not to endorse their criticism of Brandom or Wittgenstein .

  4. 4.

    Again, I set aside the question of whether this reflects an adequate reading of those passages and the point of those passages, or of the rule-following considerations.

  5. 5.

    Chapter 7 of Williams’ 2007 book was originally published in 1994.

  6. 6.

    The five central papers are ‘Radical Interpretation’ (1973), ‘Thought and Talk’ (1975), ‘Rational Animals ’ (1982), ‘A Nice Derangement of Epitaphs’ (1986), and ‘The Second Person’ (1992).

References

  • Anscombe, G. E. M. (1963). Intention (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwall, S. L. (2006). The second-person standpoint: Morality, respect, and accountability. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D. (1973/1984). Radical interpretation. In Inquiries into truth and interpretation (pp. 125–140). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D. (1975/1984). Thought and talk. In Inquiries into truth and interpretation (pp. 155–170). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D. (1982/2001). Rational animals. In Subjective, intersubjective, objective (pp. 95–106). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D. (1986). A nice derangement of epitaphs. In E. LePore (Ed.), Truth and interpretation (pp. 433–466). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D. (1992/2001). The second person. In Subjective, intersubjective, objective (pp. 107–121). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dullstein, M. (2012). The second person in the theory of mind debate. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 3(2), 231–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. A., & LePore, E. (2007). Brandom beleaguered. Philosophical and Phenomenological Research, 74(3), 677–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, S. (2001). The practice of mind: Theory, simulation or primary interaction? Journal of Consciousness Studies, 5(7), 83–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heal, J. (2013). Illocution, recognition and cooperation. Aristotelian Society Supplementary, 87(1), 137–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heal, J. (2014). Second person thought. Philosophical Explorations, 17(3), 317–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luntley, M. (2007). Learning, empowerment and judgement. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 39(4), 418–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luntley, M. (2008). Training and learning. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40(5), 695–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luntley, M. (2012). Training, training, training: The making of second nature and the roots of Wittgenstein’s pragmatism. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, 4(2), 88–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medina, J. (2002). The unity of Wittgenstein’s philosophy: Necessity, intelligibility, and normativity. State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, R. (2013). Testimony, illocution and the second person. Aristotelian Society Supplementary, 87(1), 115–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schilbach, L., Timmermans, B., Reddy, V., Costall, A., Bente, G., Schlicht, T., et al. (2013). Toward a second-person neuroscience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(04), 393–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sellars, W. (1954). Some reflections on language games. Philosophy of Science, 21(3), 204–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, D. (2003). Interpretation and skill: On passing theory. In G. Preyer, G. Peter, & M. Ulkan (Eds.), Concepts of meaning: Framing and integrated account of human behaviour (pp. 251–266). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, D. (2013). Wittgenstein and stage-setting: Being brought into the space of reasons. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 46(6), 624–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small, W. (2014). Teaching and telling. Philosophical Explorations, 17(3), 372–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smeyers, P. (1995). Initiation and newness in education and childrearing. In J. Marshall & P. Smeyers (Eds.), Philosophy and education: Accepting Wittgenstein’s challenge. Dordrect, Boston and London: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stickney, J. (2008). Training and mastery of techniques in Wittgenstein’s later philosophy: A response to Michael Luntley. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40(5), 678–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strawson, P. F. (1974/2008). Freedom and resentment and other essays. Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verheggen, C. (2006). How social must language be? Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 36(2), 203–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verheggen, C. (2015). Davidson’s second person. The Philosophical Quarterly, 47(188), 361–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. (2000). Wittgenstein and Davidson on the sociality of language. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 30(3), 299–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. (2007). Wittgenstein, mind and meaning. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1953/2009). Philosophical investigations (4th ed.). (G. E. M. Anscombe, P. M. S. Hacker, & J. Schulte, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell (PI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1956/1983). Remarks on the foundations of mathematics (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell (RFM).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1967/1970). Zettel (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell (Z).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1969/1991). On certainty (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell (OC).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Simpson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Simpson, D. (2017). Pedagogy and the Second Person. In: Peters, M., Stickney, J. (eds) A Companion to Wittgenstein on Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3136-6_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3136-6_30

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-3134-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-3136-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics