Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Science and Technology Education and Communication pp 187–199Cite as

Collaboration of Science and Technology Education and Science and Technology Communication in the Context of Innovation in Science Education

The Case from the Engage Project

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: International Technology Education Studies ((ITES,volume 15))

Abstract

There is a growing interest in bridging science & technology education (STE) and science & technology communication (STC) for mutual benefits. Several researchers call attention to connecting these two fields that have shared goals but developed as separate disciplines (Baram-Tsabari & Osborne, 2015; Negrete & Lartigue, 2004).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aikenhead, G. S. (2006). Science education for everyday life: Evidence-based practice. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baram-Tsabari, A., & Osborne, J. (2015). Bridging science education and research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(2), 135–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayram-Jacobs, D., & Henze-Rietveld, I. (2016a). The influence of innovative, RRI support teaching materials on science teachers’ practical knowledge. Paper presented at NARST, Baltimore: the USA, April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayram-Jacobs, D., & Henze-Rietveld, I. (2016b). What students learnt with the Engage materials (PowerPoint Slides). The Netherlands: TUDelft

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besley, J. C., Dudo, A. D., & Storksdieck, M. (2015). Scientists’ views about communication training. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(2), 199–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besley, J. C., Dudo, A. D., Yuan, S., & Ghannam, N. A. (2016). Qualitative interviews with science communication trainers about communication objectives and goals. Science Communication, 38(3), 356–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulunuz, N., & Jarrett, O. (2009). The effects of hands-on learning stations on building American elementary teachers’ understanding about earth and space science concepts. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 6(2), 85–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burakgazi-Gelmez, S. (2012). Connecting science communication to science education: A phenomenological inquiry into multimodal science information sources among 4th and 5th grades (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). METU, Ankara: Turkey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, T. W., O’Connor, D. J., & Stocklmayer, S. M. (2003). Science communication: A contemporary Definition. Public Understanding of Science, 12(2), 183–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen , E. G., & Lotan, R. A. (2014). Designing groupwork: Strategies for the heterogeneous classroom (3rd ed.) . New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deboer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(37), 582–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, J. (2012). Humanistic theory and digital scholarship. In M. K. Gold (Ed.), Debates in the digital humanities. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feagin, J., Orum, A., & Sjoberg, G. (Eds.). (1991). A case for case study. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinstein, N. W. (2015). Education, communication, and science in the public sphere. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(2), 145–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D. (1992). In search of a meaningful relationship: An exploration of some issues relating to integration in science and science education. International Journal of Science Education, 14, 541–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, E., & Buckley, N. (2014). Why people attend science festivals: Interests, motivations and selfreported benefits of public engagement with research. Public Understanding of Science, 23(5), 557–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C., & Scheufele, D. A. (2006). The influence of knowledge and deference toward scientific authority: A media effects model for public attitudes toward nanotechnology. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 83(4), 819–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manuel, B. (1974). How to build a learning station: Everything a teacher should know. Chelmsford, Massachusetts: Merrimack Education Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulder, H., Longnecker, N., & Davis, L. (2008). The state of science communication programs at universities around the world. Science Communication, 30(2), 277–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ocak, G. (2010). The effect of learning stations on the level of academic success and retention of elementary school students. The New Educational Review, 21(2), 146–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okada, A., & Bayram-Jacobs, D. (2016). Opportunities and challenges for equipping the next generation for responsible citizenship through the ENGAGE HUB. Paper Presented at International Conference on Responsible Research in Education and Management and its Impact, London, UK, January.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orion, N., & Hofstein, A. (1994). Factors that influence learning during a scientific field trip in a natural environment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(10), 1097–1119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J., & Collins, S. (2000). Pupils’ & parents’ views of the school science curriculum: A study funded by the Wellcome Trust. London: King’s College London. Retrieved 10 June 2016 from http://www.kcl.ac.uk/sspp/departments/education/web-files2/news-files/ppt.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Rennie, L., & Stocklmayer, S. M. (2003). The communication of sand technology: Past, present and future agendas. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 759–773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherborne T. (2014). ENGAGE: Equipping the next generation for active engagement in science. Retrieved 1 July 2014 from http://cordis.europa.eu/project/rcn/111469_en.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tellis, W. (1997). Application of a case study methodology. The Qualitative Report, 3(3). (Online) Retrieved 10 May, 2016 from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR3- 3/tellis2.html

  • Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1996). Changing approaches to teaching: A relational perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 21(3), 275–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Sanden, M. C. A., & Meijman, F. J. (2008). Dialogue guides awareness and understanding of science: An essay on different goals of dialogue leading to different science communication approaches. Public Understanding of Science, 17(1), 89–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youngblood, D. (2007). Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and bridging disciplines: A matter of process. Journal of Research Practice, 3(2). Retrieved 17 June 2016 from http://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/issue/view/6

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Science Education and Communication, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands

    Durdane Bayram-Jacobs

Authors
  1. Durdane Bayram-Jacobs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Delft University of Technology, Netherlands

    Maarten C. A. van der Sanden

  2. Delft University of Technology, Netherlands

    Marc J. de Vries

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bayram-Jacobs, D. (2016). Collaboration of Science and Technology Education and Science and Technology Communication in the Context of Innovation in Science Education. In: van der Sanden, M.C.A., de Vries, M.J. (eds) Science and Technology Education and Communication. International Technology Education Studies, vol 15. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-738-2_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-738-2_11

  • Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-738-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation