Abstract
We agree with the voices that propose a reappraisal of the role of information technology-based research tools in students’ development of scientific literacy (van Eijck & Roth, 2007). Van Eijck and Roth argue for “curricula in which the application of IT based research tools nurtures the development of scientific literacy” (2007, p. 235). This argument is along the same lines as many other testimonials to the failure of the promising regeneration of science education using Information and Communication Technologies ICT.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Astakhov, V. (2007). Continuum of consciousness: Mind uploading and resurrection of human consciousness. Is there a place for physics, neuroscience and computers? Toward a Science of Consciousness, 2008 April 8–12, 2008.
Barab, S. A., Thomas, M. K., Dodge, T., Squire, K., & Newell, M. (2004). Critical design ethnography: Designing for change. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 35(2), 254–268.
Bereiter, C. (1985). Towards a solution of the learning paradox. Review of Educational Research, 55, 201–226.
Bisley, J. W. & Pasternak, T. (2000). The multiple roles of visual cortical areas Mt/MST in remembering the direction of visual motion. Cerebral Cortex, 10, 1053–1065.
Carroll, J.M. (1997). Human-computer interaction: Psychology as a science of design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 46, 501–522.
Cobb. P. (1994). Where is the mind? A coordination of sociocultural and cognitive constructivist perspectives. In C. T. Fosnot (Ed.), Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice (pp. 34–52). New York: Teachers College Press.
Cole, M., & Hatano, G. (2007). Cultural-historical activity theory: Integrating phylogeny, cultural history, and ontogenesis in cultural psychology. In S. Kitayama & D. Cohen (Eds.), Handbook of cultural psychology, pp. 109–135.
Eckstein, M. A., & Noah, H. J. (1991). Secondary school examinations: International perspectives on policies and practice. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Fensham, P. J. (2007). Context or culture: Can Timss and Pisa teach us about what determines educational achievement in science? Internationalisation and Globalisation in Mathematics and Science Education, Section 2, 151–172.
Fodor, J. (1980). Language and learning (M. Piatelli-Palmerini, Ed., pp. 143–149). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Fuller, St., & Carrasco, M. (2006). Exogenous attention and color perception: Performance and appearance of saturation and hue. Vision Research, 46, 4032–4047.
Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays (p. 476). New York: Basic.
Goswami, U. (2004). Neuroscience and education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 1–14.
Grossberg, S. (1982). Studies of mind and brain. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: D.Reidel.
Grossberg, S. (2005). Linking attention to learning, expectation, competition, and conciousness. In L. Itti, G. Rees, & J. Tsolsos (Eds.), Neurobiology of attention. San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
Harwitz, B., & Braun A. R. (2004). Brain network interactions in auditory, visual and linguistic processing. Brain and Language, 89, 377–384.
Jenkins, E. W., & Pell, R. G. (2006). The relevance of Science Education Project (ROSE) in England: A summary of findings. Leeds: Centre for Science and Mathematics Education, University of Leeds.
Kaptelinin, V., & Nardi, B. (2006). Acting with technology: Activity theory and interaction design. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Kosslyn, S. M., & Koenig, O. (1995). Wet mind: The new cognitive neuroscience. New York: The Free Press.
Malinowski, B. (1927). The father in primitive psychology. New York: Norton.
McKeefry, D. J., et al. (2007). Speed selectivity in visual short term memory for motion. Vision Research, 47, 2418–2425.
Nardi, B., & Engeström, Y. (1999). A web on the wind: The structure of invisible work. A special issue of The Journal of Computer-supported Cooperative Work, 8(1–8). Introduction to the issue.
Nardi, B. (Ed.). (1996). Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Niedderer, H. (2001). Physics learning as cognitive development. In R. H. Evans, A. M. Andersen, & H. Sørensen (Eds.), Bridging research methodology and research aims (pp. 397–414). Student and Faculty Contributions from the 5th ESERA Summerschool in Gilleleje, Danmark. The Danish University of Education.
Osborne, J., & Hennesy, S. (2006). Literature review in science education and the role of ICT: Promise, problems and future directions. Report 6: Futurelab Series. Retrieved from www.futurelab.org.uk/research/lit_reviews.htm
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers and powerful ideas. Harvester Press.
Pasternak, T., & Greenlee, M. (2005). Working memory in primate sensory systems. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 97–107.
Pauli, W. (1995). The influence of archetypal ideas on the scientific theories of Kepler. The interpretation of nature and the psyche (p. 208). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Pollitzer, E. (1996). The evolving partnership between cognitive science and HCI. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 44, 731–741.
Ramachandran, V. S. Mirror neurons and imitation as the driving force behind “the great leap forward” in human evolution. In EDGE: The third culture. Retrieved from http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/ramachandran/ramachandran_p1.html.
Robertson, J. W. (2003). Stepping out of the box: Rethinking the failure of ICT to transform schools. Journal of Educational Change, 4, 323–344.
Roth, W.-M (1998). Learning process studies: Examples from physics. International Journal of Science Education, 20(9), 1019–1024.
Roth, W. M. (2010). Activism: A category for theorizing learning. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 10(3), 278–291.
Shaffer, D. W., & Clinton, K. A. (2006). Toolforthoughts: Reexamining thinking in the digital age. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 13(4), 283–300.
Turatto, M., et al. (2007). Attention makes moving objects be perceived to move faster. Vision Research, 47, 166–178.
Van Eijck, M., & Roth, W. M. (2007, June). Rethinking the role of information technology-based research tools in students’ development of scientific literacy. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(3), 2007.
Van Eijck, M., & Roth, W. M. (2007). Rethinking the role of information technology-based research tools in students’ development of scientific literacy. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(3), 225–238.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1999). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky, Vol. 6: Scientific legacy (M. J. Hall, Trans, R. W. Reiber, Ed.) New York: Plenum Press.
Vygotsky, L., & Luria, A. (1993). Studies on the history of behavior. Ape, primitive, and child. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. (Original work published 1930.)
Wolpert, D. M., & Ghahramani, Z. (2000). Computational principles of movement neuroscience. Nature Neuroscience, 3(Suppl.), 1212–1217.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Plakitsi, K. (2013). Rethinking the Role of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in Science Education. In: Plakitsi, K. (eds) Activity Theory in Formal and Informal Science Education. Cultural and Historical Perspectives on Science Education. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-317-4_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-317-4_4
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6091-317-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)