Skip to main content

Current Formulations of the Actual Elements of Speech

  • Chapter
Motor Phonetics
  • 60 Accesses

Abstract

One unit has been admitted on every hand: the breath group. Sweet, Rousselot, E. W. Scripture, all assume that there is no justification for the subdivision of this phrase; they count words, syllables, “sounds” as fictitious divisions having no real existence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. SWEET, History of English Sounds, Clarendon, Oxford, ‘88 p.14.

    Google Scholar 

  2. ROUSSELOT, Principes de Phonétique Expérimentale, Welter, Paris, ‘oi—’o8 p. 969, 972.

    Google Scholar 

  3. SCRIPTURE, E. W., Experimental Phonetics, Scribners, N.Y. ‘o2 p. 450. Die Verskunst und die experimentelle Phonetik, Wiener Med. Wschr. 72, ’22, no. 33, p. 1378. Impossible to divide the verse „Somebody said it couldn’t be done“ into words, or syllables, or separate sounds.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. W. DE GROOT, La Syllabe: Essai de Synthèse, Bul. de la Soc. Linguistique de Paris, 27, ‘26, p. I-42, has a very interesting discussion of the nature of the syllable and develops a functional concept of the syllable as a rhythmic element.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hist. Eng. Sounds, ‘88, p. 8. Principes II, p. 969.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Principes I, p. 307.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Grundzüge der Phonetik, BREITKOPF U. HARTEL, ‘83, 4. ed. p. 182.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cours de Linguistique Générale, PAYOT, Paris ‘22 p. 88 f.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Principes I p. 334–5 Fig. 116, 117. Précis de Prononciation Française, WELTER, Paris, ‘13, 2d éd. p. 25 Fig. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Vowels: Roy. Soc. Proc. 102, p. 752–765, Mar. 1, ‘23. Consonants: Roy. Soc. Proc. 106, p. 150–174, Aug. 1, ‘24. Quotation, p. 173. Popular statement of the position, “Invention of Human Speech,” Sci. Am. 83, ‘27, p. 204. Also „Human Speech and its Artificial Production,“ Discovery, 8, ‘27, p. 7–9.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1928 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stetson, R.H. (1928). Current Formulations of the Actual Elements of Speech. In: Motor Phonetics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-3356-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-3356-0_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-015-2147-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-3356-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics