Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Text, Speech and Language Technology ((TLTB,volume 3))

Abstract

Natural languages dispose of a rich vocabulary. Although most natives hardly use more than 5,000 words,1 the Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary of Current English (Hornby, 1974) and the French Petit Robert (Robert, 1972) both denote more than 50,000 lexical entries. And the latter is merely, with its 2,000 pages, a simplified version of the more exhaustive Robert (5,600 pages). Similarly, the Oxford English Dictionary contains more than 500,000 entries. Yet only full forms are included. Taking plural, feminine, and conjugated forms into account increases the total number of common words to be transcribed up to at least 1 million, not to mention proper nouns, the pronunciation of which is not always clearly established.

Let me take this opportunity of answering a question that has often been asked me, how to pronounce “slithy toves.” The “i” in “slithy” is long, as in “writhe”; and “toves” is pronounced so as to rhyme with “groves.” Again, the first “o” in “borogoves” is pronounced like the “o” in “borrow.” I have heard people try to give it the sound of the “o” in “worry”. Such is Human Perversity. Lewis Carroll, The Hunting of the Snake

“Mine is a long and a sad tale!” said the Mouse, turning to Alice, and sighing. “It IS a long tail, certainly,” said Alice, looking down with wonder at the Mouse’s tail; “but why do you call it sad?” Lewis Carroll, Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • AINSWORTH, W.A., and B. PELL, (1989), “Connectionist Architectures for a Text-to-Speech System”, Proceedings of Eurospeech 89, vol. 1, pp. 125–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • ALLEN, J., (1976), “Synthesis of Speech from Unrestricted Text”, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 64, n°4, pp. 433–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ALLEN, J., S. HUNNICUT, and D. KLATT, (1987), From Text To Speech, The MITALK System, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • BELRHALI, R., V. AUBERGE, and L.J. BOE, (1992), “From Lexicon to Rules: Towards a Descriptive Method of French Text-to-Phonetics Transcription”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing 92, Alberta, pp. 1183–1186.

    Google Scholar 

  • BELHOULA, K., (1993), “Rule-based Grapheme-to-Phoneme Conversion of Names”, Proceedings of Eurospeech 93, Berlin, pp. 881–884.

    Google Scholar 

  • BÖHM, A., (1992), Maschinelle Sprachausgabe Deutschen und Englishe Textes, Ph.D. dissertation, Ruhr-Universität Bochum.

    Google Scholar 

  • BOURCIEZ, E., (1958), Précis de Phonétique Française, Klincksieck, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • CHOMSKY, N., and M. HALLE, (1968), The Sound Pattern of English, Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • CHURCH, K. W., (1986), “Stress Assignment in Letter-to-Sound Rules for Speech Synthesis”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing 86, Tokyo, pp. 2423–2427.

    Google Scholar 

  • COKER, C.H., (1985), “A Dictionary-Intensive Letter-to-Sound Program”, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, suppl. 1, n°78, S7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • COKER, C.H., K.W. CHURCH, and M.Y. LIBERMAN, (1990), “Morphology and Rhyming: Two Powerful Alternatives to Letter-to-Sound Rules for Speech Synthesis”, Proceedings of the ESCA Workshop on Speech Synthesis, Autrans (France), pp. 83–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • DAELEMANS, W., and A. VAN DEN BOSCH, (1993), “TabTalk: Reusability in data-oriented grapheme-to-phoneme conversion”, Proceedings of Eurospeech 93, Berlin, pp. 1459–1462.

    Google Scholar 

  • DELATTRE, P., (1966), Studies in French and Comparated Phonetics, Mouton, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • DUTOIT, T., (1993), High Quality Text-To-Speech Synthesis of the French Language, Ph. D. dissertation, Faculté Polytechnique de Mons.

    Google Scholar 

  • ESPRIT-SAM (1992), “Standard Computer-Compatible Transcription”, ESPRIT Project 2589, Stage Report Sen.93, SAM-UCL-037.

    Google Scholar 

  • FISHER, W., V. ZUE, J. BERNSTEIN, and D. PALLETT, (1987), “An Acoustic-Phonetic Data Bas”, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Suppl. 1, 81.

    Google Scholar 

  • HORNBY, A.S., (ed), (1974), Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary of Current English, 3rd edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • HUNNICUT S., (1980), “Grapheme-to-Phoneme Rules: a Review”, Speech Transmission Laboratory, QPSR 2-3, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, pp. 38–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • IMBS, P., (1971), Etudes Statistiques sur le Vocabulaire Français. Dictionnaire des Fréquences. Centre de Recherches pour un Trésor de la Langue Française (CNRS), Marcel Didier, Nançy, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • INALF, (1984), Dictionnaire des Fréquences: Table de Répartition des Homographes, CNRS — INALF (Institut National de la Langue Française), Nancy.

    Google Scholar 

  • KARTUNNEN, L., K. KOSKENNIEMI, and R.M. KAPLAN, (1987), “A Compiler for Two-LevelPhonological Rules”, Report n° CSLI-87-108, Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • KLATT, D., and D. SHIPMAN, (1982), “Letter-to-Phoneme Rules: a Semiautomatic Discovery Procedure”, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, suppl 1, n° 72, S.48.

    Google Scholar 

  • KLATT, D. H., (1987), “Review of Text-to-Speech Conversion for English”, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 82, 3, pp. 737–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KOSKENNIEMI, K., (1983), Two Level Morphology: A General Computational Model for Word-Form Recognition and Production, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of General Linguistics, University of Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • LAWRENCE, S.G.C., and G. KAYE, (1986), “Alignment of Phonemes with their Corresponding Orthography”, Computer Speech and Language, 1, pp. 153–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LENNIG, M., and J.P. BRASSARD, (1984), “Machine Readable Phonetic Alphabet for English and French”, Speech Communication, 3, pp. 165–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LEON, P.R., (1966), Pronunciation du Français Standard, Didier, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • LEVEMSON, S.E., J.P. OLIVE, and J.S. TSCHIRGI, (1993), “Speech Synthesis in Telecommunications”, IEEE Communications Magazine, pp. 46–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • LIBERMAN, M.J., (1979), “Phonemic Transcription, Stress, and Segment Durations for Spelled Proper Names”, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Suppl.1, 64, S. 163.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • LIBERMAN, M.J., and K.W. CHURCH, (1992), “Text Analysis and Word Pronunciation in Text-to-Speech Synthesis”, in Advances in Speech Signal Processing, S. Furuy, M.M. Sondhi, eds., Dekker, New York, pp.791–831.

    Google Scholar 

  • LUCASSEN, J.M. and R.L. MERCER, (1984), “An Information Theoretic Approach to the Automatic Determination of Phoneme Base Forms”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing 84, 52.5, pp. 42–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • LUK, R.W.P., and DAMPER, R.L, (1996), “Stochastic Phonographic Transduction for English”, Computer Speech and Language, n°10, 133–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • MATSUMUTO, T. and Y. YAMAGUCHI, (1990), “A Multi-Language Text-to-Speech System Using Neural Networks”, Proceedings of the ESCA Workshop on Speech Synthesis, Autrans, pp. 269–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • MANNEL, R., and J.E. CLARK, (1987), “Text-to-Speech Rule and Dictionary Development”, Speech Communication, n°6, pp. 317–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • MC CULLOCH, N., M. BEDWORTH, and J. BRIDLE, (1987), “NETSPEAK — a re-implementation of NETTALK”, Computer Speech and Language, 2, pp. 289–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NYROP, K., (1963), Manuel Phonétique du Français Parlé, Gylendal, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • RILEY, M.D., (1991), “A Statistical Model for Generating Pronunciation Networks”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing 91, pp. 737–740

    Google Scholar 

  • ROBERT, P., (1972), Le Petit Robert, Société du Nouveau Littré, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • SCHMIDT, M., S. FITT, C. SCOTT, and M. JACK, (193), “Phonetic Transcription Standards for European Names (ONOMASTICA)”, Proceedings of Eurospeech 93, Berlin, pp. 279–282. (see also URL address: http://guagua.echo.lu/langeng/en/lrel/onomas.html)

  • SEJNOWSKI, T., and C.R. ROSENBERG, (1987), “Parallel Networks that Learn to Pronounce English Text”, Complex Systems, n°l, pp. 145–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • SHOUP, J. E., (1980), “Phonological Aspects of Speech Recognition”, in Trends in Speech Recognition, W.A. Lea, ed., Prentice-Hall, New-York, pp. 125–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • TORKKOLA, K., (1993), “An Efficient Way to Learn English Grapheme-to-Phoneme Rules Automatically”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing 93, pp. II.199–II.202.

    Google Scholar 

  • VAN COILE, B., (1991), “Inductive Learning of Pronunciation Rules with the DEPES System”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing 91, Toronto, vol. 2, pp. 745–748.

    Google Scholar 

  • VAN COILE, B., (1993), “On the Development of Pronunciation Rules for Text-to-Speech Synthesis”, Proceedings of Eurospeech 93, Berlin, vol. 2, pp. 1455–1458.

    Google Scholar 

  • WILLIAMS, B., (1994), “Welsh Letter-to-Sound Rules: Rewrite Rules and Two-Level Rules Compared”, Computer Speech and Language, n°8, 261–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • WITHGOTT, M. M., and F.R. CHEN, (1993), Computational Models of American English, CSLI Lecture Notes,, n°32, Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • WITTEN, I.H., (1982), Principles of Computer Speech, Academic Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • YVON, F., (1996), “Grapheme-to-Phoneme Conversion of Multiple Unbounded Overlapping Chunks”, CMP-LG, paper n° 960800621

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dutoit, T. (1997). Automatic Phonetization. In: An Introduction to Text-to-Speech Synthesis. Text, Speech and Language Technology, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5730-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5730-8_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-0369-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5730-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics