Skip to main content

Performance Analysis of Feature Extractors for Object Recognition from EEG Signals

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Bioengineering ((LNBE))

Abstract

Recognition of objects from EEG signals requires selection of appropriate feature extraction and classification techniques with best efficiency in terms of highest classification accuracy with lowest run time for its applications in real time. The objective of this paper is to analyze the performance of various feature extraction techniques and to choose that particular method which can be implemented in real time system with best efficiency. The EEG signals are acquired from subjects while they explored the objects visually and visuo-tactually. Thus acquired EEG signals are preprocessed followed by feature extraction using adaptive autoregressive (AAR) parameters, ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD), approximate entropy (ApEn) and multi-fractal detrended fluctuation analysis (MFDFA). The performance of these features are analyzed in terms of their dimension, extraction time and also depending upon the classification results produced by three classifiers [Support Vector machine (SVM), Naïve Bayesian (NB), and Adaboost (Ada)] independently according to classification accuracy, sensitivity and classification times. The experimental results show that AAR parameter has an optimum dimension of 36 (not too large like EEMD i.e. 7,680 or too small like ApEn i.e. 6) and required minimum extraction as well as classification time of 0.59 and 0.008 s respectively. AAR also yielded highest maximum classification accuracy and sensitivity of 80.95 and 92.31 % respectively with NB classifier. Thus AAR parameters can be chosen for real time object recognition from EEG signal along with Naïve Bayesian classifier.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Schacter DL, Gilbert DL, Wegner DM (2009) Psychology, 2nd edn. Worth Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mishkin M, Ungerleider LG (1982) Contribution of striate inputs to the visuospatial functions of parieto-preoccipital cortex in monkeys. Behav Brain Res 6(1):57–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kuo CC, Yau HT (2006) A new combinatorial approach to surface reconstruction with sharp features. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graphics 12(1):73–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pezzementi Z, Reyda C, Hager GD (2011) Object mapping, recognition and localization from tactile geometry. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference robotics and automation, pp 5942–5948

    Google Scholar 

  5. Singh G et al (2012) Object shape recognition from tactile images using regional descriptors. In: Fourth world congress on nature and biologically inspired computing (NaBIC) 2012, pp 53–58

    Google Scholar 

  6. Khasnobish A, Konar A, Tibarewala DN, Bhattacharyya S, Janarthanan R (2013) Object shape recognition from EEG signals during tactile and visual exploration. In: Accepted in international conference on pattern recognition and machine intelligence (PReMI), 10–14 Dec 2013

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vallabhaneni A, Wang T, He B (2005) Brain–computer interface in neural engineering. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 85–121

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Teplan M (2002) Fundamentals of EEG measurement. Meas Sci Rev 2(2):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sanei S, Chambers JA (2007) Brain computer interfacing. EEG Signal Process, pp 239–265

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yom-Tov E, Inbar GF (2002) Feature selection for the classification of movements from single movement-related potentials. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 10:170–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bhattacharyya S, Khasnobish A, Konar A, Tibarewala DN (2010) Performance analyisis of LDA, QDA and KNN algorithms in left-right limb movement classification from EEG data. In: Accepted for oral presentation in international conference on systems in medicine and biology, IIT Kharagpur, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tae-Ki A, Moon-Hyun K (2010) A new diverse AdaBoost classifier. In: International conference on artificial intelligence and computational intelligence (AICI) 2010, pp 359–363

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cunningham P (2009) Evaluation in machine learning: objectives and strategies for evaluation. In: European conference on machine learning and principles and practice of knowledge discovery in databases 2009, p 26

    Google Scholar 

  14. Daniel WW (2002) Biostatistics. Hypothesis testing, 7th edn. Wiley, New York, pp 204–229

    Google Scholar 

  15. Thulasidas M, Guan C, Wu J (2006) Robust classification of EEG signal for brain computer interface. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 14(1):24–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Vickenswaran J, Samraj A, Kiong LC (2007) Motor imagery signal classification using adaptive recursive band pass filter and adaptive autoregressive models for brain machine interface designs. J Biol Life Sci 3(2):116–123

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schloegl A et al (1997) Using adaptive autoregressive parameters for a brain-computer-interface experiment. In: Proceedings of the 19th annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society 1997, vol 4, pp 1533–1535

    Google Scholar 

  18. Torres ME et al (2011) A complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise. In: IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing (ICASSP) 2011, pp 4144–4147

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pincus SM (1991) Approximate entropy as a measure of system complexity. In: Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88(6):2297–2301

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lei W et al (2007) Feature extraction of mental task in BCI based on the method of approximate entropy. In: 29th annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society, EMBS 2007, pp 1941–1944

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kantelhardt JW et al (2002) Multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis of nonstationary time series. J Physica A 316, 82:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ihlen EAF (2012) Introduction to multifractal wavelet and detrended fluctuation analyses. Front Physiol: Fractal Physiology 3(141):1–18

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mahajan K, Rajput SM (2012) A comparative study of EEG and SVM for EEG classification. J Eng Res Technol 1(6):1–6

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study has been supported by University Grants Commission, India, University of Potential Excellence Program (UGC-UPE) (Phase II) in Cognitive Science, Jadavpur University and Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), India.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anwesha Khasnobish .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer India

About this paper

Cite this paper

Khasnobish, A., Bhattacharyya, S., Konar, A., Tibarewala, D.N. (2015). Performance Analysis of Feature Extractors for Object Recognition from EEG Signals. In: Gupta, S., Bag, S., Ganguly, K., Sarkar, I., Biswas, P. (eds) Advancements of Medical Electronics. Lecture Notes in Bioengineering. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2256-9_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2256-9_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi

  • Print ISBN: 978-81-322-2255-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-81-322-2256-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics