Skip to main content

Integration of Emission Reduction and Environmental Management Goals for Sustainable Urban Development

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Energy Security and Development
  • 1294 Accesses

Abstract

Urbanisation and urban population growth have together been exerting pressure on the resources available while causing environmental pollution and resource degradation. These issues have led to a ‘green agenda’ that has been customarily dealt with in the form of assessing ecological footprint of cities, environmental impact analyses, and carrying-capacity assessments; the development/management plans for regions/city-regions are prepared based on these assessments. Such environmental management plans identify the actions/interventions that mitigate the likely impacts of urban development activities on resources, ecology, and environment. The understanding of climate change and its impact on the human society in the past decade has set a somewhat different global agenda with a focus on: (a) reducing green house gases, (b) instituting adaptation mechanisms, and (c) undertaking mitigation measures. The ultimate objectives of both these agenda are not mutually exclusive; rather, they can be ‘mutually reinforcing’ than being ‘autonomous’. There exists potential for their integration at urban/city-region level. Green management actions can reinforce the ‘emission reduction agenda’, if they were well cast based on the synergistic linkages between the two. This chapter attempts to bring out the possible integration between the approaches of ‘green agenda’ and ‘emission reduction agenda’, and it identifies the areas where both of them potentially converge. It also brings out the approaches of ‘Compact City’ in the UK and ‘Smart Growth’ in the USA with reference to such integration as a relevant case for replication in India, albeit to a good extent in metropolitan and mega cities like Mumbai.

This chapter is built upon another paper entitled ‘Compact city and smart growth as models for urban development’ written by the author for Sustainability Tomorrow for its special issue on ‘Rethinking Cities’ (Volume 3, Issue 2) in 2008.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Jenks and Burgess (2000) predicted that by 2025, 26 mega-cities with more than 10 million people would emerge, of which 22 are located in developing countries. India itself is expected to add four cities to the list.

  2. 2.

    Industrial policy of Maharashtra state in India, for example, did not allow any major industrial establishment set-up within the municipal limits of Mumbai (other than the existing factories/mills established much earlier).

  3. 3.

    An example given in this context is a wide difference in the ecological footprints of Barcelona and Atlanta, both are of comparable populations. Barcelona has low ecological footprint because of compact city development with better access to mass transport, whereas Atlanta has a spread out form of city with limited access to public transport.

  4. 4.

    However, this theory is debated afresh with the citation of omissions and survey of the cities in the West. At the same time, Compact City is contested for bringing in energy-intensive structures, services, and transport.

  5. 5.

    Few regions in India–National Capital Region and Jamshedpur region—have carrying-capacity-based development plans prepared for the respective regions.

  6. 6.

    Kanpur city has got an urban environmental management plan prepared for it, but it has too many recommendations and lacks the ownership of local government as well as other concerned authorities.

References

  • ADB (Asian Development Bank) (2003) Transport planning and traffic management for better air quality: policy guidelines for reducing vehicle emissions in Asia. ADB, Manila

    Google Scholar 

  • Buch MN (1997) Environmental consciousness & urban planning. Tracts for Times/2. Orient Longman, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Burchell RW, Mukherjee S (2003) Conventional development vs managed growth: the costs of sprawl. Am J Public Health 93(9):1534–1540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheshire P, Sheppard S (1989) British planning policy and access to housing: some empirical estimates. Urban Stud 26:469–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dakal S (2004) Urban energy use and greenhouse gas emissions in Asian mega cities: policies for sustainable future. Institute of Global Environmental Studies, Kyoto

    Google Scholar 

  • Dantzig GB, Saaty TL (1974) Compact city: a plan for a livable urban environment. W. H. Freeman Press, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Duany A, Zyberk EP, Speck J (1999) Suburban nation: the rise of sprawl and the decline of American dream. North Point Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2007) Urban environmental management plan: benefits for local authorities. NS, CMW

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta SC (2009) Urban poor friendly development promotion rules and building byelaws. Inst Town Plan (India) J 6(3):79–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan Al-M, Zetter R (2002) Sustainable development: between development and environmental agendas in the developing world. In: Zetter R, White R (eds) Planning in the cities: sustainability and growth in the developing world. ITDG Publishing, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaji H Compact city and sustainable urban form: is compact city approach appropriate as an urban development policy for cities in developing countries? http://web.sfc.keio.ac.jp/unodb/fasid/lec_note/1201p.pdf Accessed 14 Sept 2004

  • Kojima M, Lovei M (2001) Urban air quality management: coordinating transport, environment and energy policies in developing countries. World Bank Technical Paper No. 508, Washington, DC: The World Bank

    Google Scholar 

  • Kundu A (2006) Trends and patterns of urbanization and their economic implications. India Infrastructure Report 2006. Oxford University Press, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawton J (2007) The urban environment. Royal Commission of Environmental Pollution

    Google Scholar 

  • Litman T (2003) Smart growth: more efficient land use management. TDM Encyclopedia

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenks M, Burgess R (2000) Compact cities: sustainable urban forms for developing countries. Spon Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Nallathiga R.(2005) The impact of density regulation on cities and markets: evidence from Mumbai. Int J Regul Gov 5(1):13–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Nallathiga R(2007) Compact city and smart growth as policy guiding models for achieving sustainable city development: the case of Mumbai metropolis. ICFAI J Urban Policy II(1):42–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson RC, Pendall R, Dawkins C and Knaap G (2002) The link between Growth Management and Housing Affordability: The Academic Evidence, Brookings Institution, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman P, Kenworthy J (1999) Sustainability and cities: overcoming automobile dependence. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens S (1985) Energy and urban form. Pion Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen R (2002) Land and use planning and urban transport: a sourcebook for policy makers in developing cities. GTZ, Eshborn

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees WE, Wackernagel M (1996) Our ecological footprint: reducing human impact on earth. New Society Publishers, British Columbia

    Google Scholar 

  • Sivaramakrishnan KC, Kundu A (2007) Handbook of urbanization in India. Oxford University Press, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Staley SR, Gilroy LC (2002) Smart growth and housing affordability: evidence from state-wide planning laws. Policy Study 287. Reason Public Policy Institute, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  • William K, Burton E, Jenks M (eds) (2001) Achieving sustainable urban form. Spon Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Zetter R (2002) Market enablement or sustainable development: the conflicting paradigms of urbanization. In: Zetter R, White R (eds) Planning in the cities: sustainability and growth the developing world. ITDG Publishing, London

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ramakrishna Nallathiga .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer India

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nallathiga, R. (2015). Integration of Emission Reduction and Environmental Management Goals for Sustainable Urban Development. In: Reddy, B., Ulgiati, S. (eds) Energy Security and Development. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2065-7_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2065-7_30

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi

  • Print ISBN: 978-81-322-2064-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-81-322-2065-7

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics