Skip to main content

LA- and PS-hierarchies in Comparison

  • Chapter
Foundations of Computational Linguistics
  • 214 Accesses

Abstract

Having presented two non-equivalent formalisms of generative grammar,1 each with its own fully developed hierarchy of language and complexity classes, we return in this chapter to the formal properties of natural language. Section 12.1 compares the complexity of the LA- and PS-grammatical language classes. Section 12.2 describes the inclusion relations between language classes in the PS- and the LA-hierarchy, respectively. Section 12.3 defines a context-free language which is a C3-language. Section 12.4 describes the orthogonal relation between the context-free languages and the classes of C-languages. Section 12.5 investigates ambiguity in natural language, and concludes that the natural languages are in the class of C1-LAGs, thus parsing in linear time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Namely PS-grammar in Chapters 8 and 9, and LA-grammar in Chapters 10 and 11.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hardest Context-Free Language, S. Greibach 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hierarchy lemma, Hoperoft and Ullman 1979, p. 228.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See Hoperoft and Ullman 1979, p. 228, Theorem 9.8. The A-LAGs generate the recursive languages while the B-LAGs generate the context-sensitive languages, as shown in 11.1 and 11. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cf. Hoperoft and Ullman 1979, p. 324ff.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Assuming that the proper inclusion of C2 C C3 could be shown directly (for example, by means of a pumping lemma for C2-languages), then this would imply P C NP only if it can be shown that C2 = P, which is improbable.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Not only is a PSPACE-complete problem not likely to be in P, it is also not likely to be in NP. Hence the property whose existence is PSPACE-complete probably cannot even be verified in polynomial time using a polynomial length `guess.’

    Google Scholar 

  8. Because L.. is a deterministic context-free language, it can be parsed in linear time in PS-grammar. Cf. B. Stubert 1993, p. 71, Lemma 5. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See also M. Harrison 1978, p. 219 ff., in the same vein.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A.K. Joshi et al. 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hoperoft and Ullman 1979, p. 389 f. T. Hayashi 1973 proved a pumping lemma for index languages.

    Google Scholar 

  12. First proposed in CoL, p. 219–232 and 239–247.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Syntactically, the prepositional phrases are categorized as (adv and pnm) using the multicat notation (see Section 15.2).

    Google Scholar 

  14. At least on the syntactic level.

    Google Scholar 

  15. The structural properties assigned by CoNSyx to natural language syntax may and should be tested empirically in the continuing analysis of various different languages. Possible counterexamples to 12.5.7 would be constructions of natural language with +recursive syntactic ambiguities which do not allow an alternative treatment based on semantic doubling. Given the mechanism of natural communication within the SLIM theory of language, it seems unlikely that such constructions will be found.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hausser, R. (2001). LA- and PS-hierarchies in Comparison. In: Foundations of Computational Linguistics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04337-0_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04337-0_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-07626-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-04337-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics