Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Der Partnermarkt und die Gelegenheiten des Kennenlernens pp 221–241Cite as

The Social Structure of Opportunities for Contact and Interaction and Strategies for Analysing Friendship Networks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Within the individualistic model of sociological explanation (Coleman 1986; 1990; Esser 1993, pp. 83 ff.), the macro-micro-link is usually being conceptionalized as link between situational alternatives of action on the micro-level and the actor’s subjective expectations and evaluations about the situation on the macro-level (see Esser 1996; Kroneberg 2005). However, methodological individualism has to deal not only with the actor’s subjective definition of the situation, but also with structural constraints of action, i. e. a structural macro-micro-link.

This paper presents fundamental ideas on the conception of opportunities for contact and interaction that I have discussed previously elsewhere in German language and with a focus on marriage markets (Stauder 2008). This paper in English language shall address an international public and will focus on the analysis of friendship networks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allan, Graham. 1977. Class Variation in Friendship Patterns. The British Journal of Sociology 28: 389–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allan, Graham. 1989. Friendship: developing a sociological perspective. New York, London, Toronto, Sydney, Tokyo: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Gary S. 1973. A Theory of Marriage: Part I. Journal of Political Economy 81: 813–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Gary S. 1974. A Theory of Marriage. In Economics of the Family. Marriage, Children, and Human Capital,Ed. Theodore W. Schultz, 299–344. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, Peter M. 1977a. Inequality and Heterogeneity. A Primitive Theory of Social Structure. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, Peter M. 1977b. A Macrosociological Theory of Social Structure. American Journal of Sociology 83: 26–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, Peter M. 1994. Structural Contexts of Opportunities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, Peter M., Carolyn Beeker and Kevin M. Fitzpatrick. 1984. Intersecting Social Affiliations and Intermarriage. Social Forces 62: 585–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, Peter M., Terry C. Blum and Joseph E. Schwartz. 1982. Heterogeneity and Intermarriage. American Sociological Review 47: 45–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, Peter M., and Joseph E. Schwartz. 1984. Crosscutting Social Circles: Testing a Macrostructural Theory of Intergroup Relations. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1983. Ökonomisches Kapital, kulturelles Kapital, soziales Kapital. In Soziale Ungleichheiten. Soziale Welt, Sonderband 2,Ed. Reinhard Kreckel, 183–198. Göttingen: Schwartz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, Ronald. 1992. Structural Holes. The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, James S. 1986. Social Theory, Social Research, and a Theory of Action. American Journal of Sociology 91: 1309–1335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, James S. 1988. Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology 94: 95–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, James S. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge (Mass.): Belknap.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossley, Nick. 2008. (Net)Working out: social capital in a private health club. British Journal of Sociology 59: 475–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esser, Hartmut. 1993. Soziologie. Allgemeine Grundlagen. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esser, Hartmut. 1996. Die Definition der Situation. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 48: 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esser, Hartmut. 2000. Soziologie. Spezielle Grundlagen. Band 4: Opportunitäten und Restriktionen. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feld, Scott L. 1981. The Focused Organization of Social Ties. American Journal of Sociology 86: 1015–1035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feld, Scott L. 1982. Social Structural Determinants of Similarity among Associates. American Sociological Review 47: 797–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feld, Scott L. 1984. The structured use of personal associates. Social Forces 62: 642–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feld, Scott L. 1997. Structural embeddedness and stability of interpersonal relations. Social Networks 19: 91–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feld, Scott L., and William C. Carter. 1998. When Desegregation Reduces Interracial Contact: A Class Size Paradox for Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology 103: 1165–1186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feld, Scott L., and William C. Carter. 1999. Foci of activity as changing contexts for friendship. In Placing friendship in context,Ed. Rebecca Adams and Graham Allan, 136–152. Cambridge: University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Feld, Scott L., and Bernard Grofman. 2009. Homophily and the Focused Organization of Ties. In The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology,Ed. Peter Hedström and Peter Bearman, 521–543. Oxford: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, Gary Alan. 1986. Friendships in the work place. In Friendship and Social Interaction,Ed. Valerian J. Derlega and Barbara A. Winstead, 185–206. New York, Berlin, Heidelberg, Tokyo: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, Claude S. 1982. To dwell among friends: personal networks in town and city. Chicago [u. a.]: Univ. of Chicago Pr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, Claude S., Robert M. Jackson, C. Ann Stueve, Kathleen Gerson, Lynne McCallister Jones and Mark Baldassare. 1977. Networks and Places. Social Relations in the Urban Setting. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flap, Henk. 2002. No man is an island. In Conventions and Structures in Economic Organization. Markets, Networks and Hierarchies,Ed. Olivier Favereau and Emmanuel Lazega, 29–59. London: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, Noreen, Charles F. Westoff and Charles Hammerslough. 1984. Demography of the Marriage Market in the United States. Population Index 50: 5–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, Mark S. 1973. The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology 78: 1360–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homans, George C. 1950. The Human Group. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huckfeldt, Robert R. 1983. Social Contexts, Social Networks, and Urban Neighborhoods. Environmental Constraints on Friendship Choice. American Journal of Sociology 89: 651–669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalmijn, Matthijs. 2002. Sex Segregation of Friendship Networks. Individual and Structural Determinants of Having Cross‐Sex Friends. European Sociological Review 18: 101–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, Thomas, and Johannes Stauder. 2008. Partnermärkte in Deutschland im Spiegel eines neuen Erhebungsinstruments. In Neuere Entwicklungen in der Beziehungsund Familienforschung. Vorstudien zum Beziehungs- und Familienentwicklungspanel (pairfam),Ed. Johannes Huinink and Michael Feldhaus, 78–113. Würzburg: Ergon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kossinets, Gueorgi, and Duncan J. Watts. 2006. Empirical Analysis of an Evolving Social Network. Science 311: 88–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroneberg, Clemens. 2005. Die Definition der Situation und die variable Rationalität der Akteure. Ein allgemeines Modell des Handelns. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 34: 344–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Nan, Walter M. Ensel and John C. Vaughn. 1981. Social Resources and Strength of Ties: Structural Factors in Occupational Status Attainment. American Sociological Review 46: 393–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louch, Hugh. 2000. Personal network integration: transitivity and homophily in strong-ties relations. Social Networks 22: 45–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, Peter V. 1987. Core Discussion Networks of Americans. American Sociological Review 52: 122–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, Peter V. 1990. Network Diversity, Substructures, and Opportunities for Contact. In Structures of Power and Constraint: Papers in Honor of Peter M. Blau,Hrsg. Craig Calhoun, Marshall W. Meyer and Richard W. Scott, 397–410. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, J. Miller, and Lynn Smith-Lovin. 1986. Sex Segregation in Voluntary Associations. American Sociological Review 51: 61–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, J. Miller, and Lynn Smith-Lovin. 1987. Homophily in Voluntary Organizations: Status Distance and the Composition of Face-To-Face Groups. American Sociological Review 52: 370–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, J. Miller, Lynn Smith-Lovin and James M. Cook. 2001. Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks. Annual Review of Sociology 27: 415–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mollenhorst, Gerald. 2008. Context overlap and multiplexity in personal relationships. In Why context matters. Applications of social network analysis,Ed. Thomas N. Friemel, 55–78. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mollenhorst, Gerald, Beate Völker and Henk Flap. 2008a. Social Contexts and Core Discussion Networks: Using a Choice-Constraint Approach to Study Similarity in Intimate Relationships. Social Forces 86: 937–965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mollenhorst, Gerald, Beate Völker and Henk Flap. 2008b. Social contexts and personal relationships: The effect of meeting opportunities on similarity for relationships of different strength. Social Networks 30: 60–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Gwen. 1990. Structural Determinants of Men’s and Women’s Personal Networks. American Sociological Review 55: 726–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munch, Allison, J. Miller McPherson and Lynn Smith-Lovin. 1997. Gender, Children, and Social Contact: The Effects of Childrearing for Men and Woman. American Sociological Review 62: 509–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ormel, Johan, Siegwart M. Lindenberg, Nardi Steverink and Lois M. Verbrugge. 1999. Subjective Well-Being and Social Production Functions. Social Indicators Research 46: 61–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Robert D. 1993. Making Democracy Work. Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Robert D. 1995. Tuning In, Tuning Out: the Strange Disappearance of Social Capital in America. Political Science and Politics XXVIII 4: 664–683.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Robert D. 2000. Bowling alone. The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York/London/Toronto/Sydney/Singapore: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, Joseph E. 1990. Penetrating Differentiation: Linking Macro and Micro Phenomena. In Structures of Power and Constraint: Papers in Honor of Peter M. Blau,Ed. Craig Calhoun, Marshall W. Meyer and Richard W. Scott, 353–374. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stauder, Johannes. 2006. Die Verfügbarkeit partnerschaftlich gebundener Akteure für den Partnermarkt. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 58: 617–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stauder, Johannes. 2008. Opportunitäten und Restriktionen des Kennenlernens. Zur sozialen Vorstrukturierung der Kontaktgelegenheiten am Beispiel des Partnermarkts. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 60: 265–285. Stauder, Johannes. forthcoming. Friendship-Networks and the Social Structure of Opportunities for Contact and Interaction. Social Science Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbrugge, Lois M. 1977. The Structure of Adult Friendship Choices. Social Forces 56: 576–597.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbrugge, Lois M. 1979. Multiplexity in Adult Friendships. Social Forces 57: 1286–1309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Max. 1980. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriß der verstehenden Soziologie. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Max-Weber-Institut für Soziologie, Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland

    Dr. Johannes Stauder

Authors
  1. Dr. Johannes Stauder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johannes Stauder .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Max-Weber-Institut für Soziologie, Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

    Armando Häring

  2. Max-Weber-Institut für Soziologie, Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

    Thomas Klein

  3. Max-Weber-Institut für Soziologie, Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

    Johannes Stauder

  4. Max-Weber-Institut für Soziologie, Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

    Kristian Stoye

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stauder, J. (2014). The Social Structure of Opportunities for Contact and Interaction and Strategies for Analysing Friendship Networks. In: Häring, A., Klein, T., Stauder, J., Stoye, K. (eds) Der Partnermarkt und die Gelegenheiten des Kennenlernens. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02794-0_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02794-0_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-02793-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-02794-0

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation