Abstract
We show that computing the revenue-optimal deterministic auction in unit-demand single-buyer Bayesian settings, i.e. the optimal item-pricing, is computationally hard even in single-item settings where the buyer’s value distribution is a sum of independently distributed attributes, or multi-item settings where the buyer’s values for the items are independent. We also show that it is intractable to optimally price the grand bundle of multiple items for an additive bidder whose values for the items are independent. These difficulties stem from implicit definitions of a value distribution. We provide three instances of how different properties of implicit distributions can lead to intractability: the first is a #P-hardness proof, while the remaining two are reductions from the SQRT-SUM problem of Garey, Graham, and Johnson [14]. While simple pricing schemes can oftentimes approximate the best scheme in revenue, they can have drastically different underlying structure. We argue therefore that either the specification of the input distribution must be highly restricted in format, or it is necessary for the goal to be mere approximation to the optimal scheme’s revenue instead of computing properties of the scheme itself.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alaei, S.: Bayesian Combinatorial Auctions: Expanding Single Buyer Mechanisms to Many Buyers. In: The 52nd Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS (2011)
Alaei, S., Fu, H., Haghpanah, N., Hartline, J., Malekian, A.: Bayesian Optimal Auctions via Multi- to Single-agent Reduction. In: The 13th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC) (2012)
Armstrong, M.: Price Discrimination by a Many-Product Firm. Review of Economic Studies 66(1), 151–168 (1999)
Bhattacharya, S., Goel, G., Gollapudi, S., Munagala, K.: Budget Constrained Auctions with Heterogeneous Items. In: The 42nd ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC (2010)
Briest, P.: Uniform Budgets and the Envy-Free Pricing Problem. In: Aceto, L., Damgård, I., Goldberg, L.A., Halldórsson, M.M., Ingólfsdóttir, A., Walukiewicz, I. (eds.) ICALP 2008, Part I. LNCS, vol. 5125, pp. 808–819. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Cai, Y., Daskalakis, C.: Extreme-Value Theorems for Optimal Multidimensional Pricing. In: The 52nd Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS (2011)
Cai, Y., Daskalakis, C., Matthew Weinberg, S.: An Algorithmic Characterization of Multi-Dimensional Mechanisms. In: The 44th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC (2012)
Cai, Y., Daskalakis, C., Matthew Weinberg, S.: Optimal Multi-Dimensional Mechanism Design: Reducing Revenue to Welfare Maximization. In: The 53rd Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS (2012)
Chawla, S., Hartline, J.D., Kleinberg, R.D.: Algorithmic Pricing via Virtual Valuations. In: The 8th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, EC (2007)
Chawla, S., Hartline, J.D., Malec, D.L., Sivan, B.: Multi-Parameter Mechanism Design and Sequential Posted Pricing. In: The 42nd ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC (2010)
Daskalakis, C., Matthew Weinberg, S.: Symmetries and Optimal Multi-Dimensional Mechanism Design. In: The 13th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, EC (2012)
Etessami, K., Yannakakis, M.: On the Complexity of Nash Equilibria and Other Fixed Points. SIAM J. Comput. 39(6), 2531–2597 (2010)
Fang, H., Norman, P.: To bundle or not to bundle. RAND Journal of Economics 37(4), 946–963 (2006)
Garey, M.R., Graham, R.L., Johnson, D.S.: Some NP-Complete Geometric Problems. In: The 8th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC (1976)
Hart, S., Nisan, N.: Approximate revenue maximization with multiple items. In: The 13th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, EC (2012)
Lev, O.: A Two-Dimensional Problem of Revenue Maximization. Discussion Paper Series dp542, The Center for the Study of Rationality, Hebrew University, Jerusalem (April 2010)
Manelli, A.M., Vincent, D.R.: Multidimensional Mechanism Design: Revenue Maximization and the Multiple-Good Monopoly. Journal of Economic Theory 137(1), 153–185 (2007)
Manelli, A.M., Vincent, D.R.: Bundling as an optimal selling mechanism for a multiple-good monopolist. Journal of Economic Theory 127(1), 1–35 (2006)
Milgrom, P.: Putting Auction Theory to Work. Cambridge University Press (2004)
Myerson, R.B.: Optimal Auction Design. Mathematics of Operations Research 6(1), 58–73 (1981)
Nisan, N., Roughgarden, T., Tardos, E., Vazirani, V.V.: Algorithmic Game Theory. Cambridge University Press, New York (2007)
Papadimitriou, C.H., Pierrakos, G.: On optimal single-item auctions. In: The 43rd Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC (2011)
Sipser, M.: Introduction to the theory of computation, 2nd edn. PWS Pub., Boston (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Daskalakis, C., Deckelbaum, A., Tzamos, C. (2012). Optimal Pricing Is Hard. In: Goldberg, P.W. (eds) Internet and Network Economics. WINE 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7695. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35311-6_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35311-6_22
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-35310-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-35311-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)