Abstract
Traditional models of gender equity incorporating deficit frameworks and creating norms based on male experiences have been challenged by models emphasizing the social construction of gender and positing that women may come to know things in different ways from men. This paper draws on the latter form of feminist theory while treating gender equity in mathematics as intimately interconnected with equity issues by social class and ethnicity. I integrate feminist and social justice literature in mathematics education and argue that to secure a transformative, sustainable impact on equity, we must treat mathematics as an integral component of a larger system producing educated citizens. I argue the need for a mathematics education with tri-fold support for mathematical literacy, critical literacy, and community literacy. Respectively, emphases are on mathematics, social critique, and community relations and actions. Currently, the integration of these three literacies is extremely limited in mathematics.
Keywords
This chapter is a reprint of an article published in ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education (2008) 40(4), 647–657. DOI 10.1007/s11858-008-0113-0.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Apple, M. W. (1992). Do the Standards go far enough? Power, policy, and practice in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23(5), 412–431.
Banks, J. A. (2006). Democracy, diversity, and social justice: Educating citizens for the public interest in a global age. In G. Ladson-Billings & W. F. Tate (Eds.), Education research in the public interest: Social justice, action, and policy (pp. 141–157). New York: Teachers College Press.
Baxter Magolda, M. (1992). Knowing and reasoning in college: Gender-related patterns in students’ intellectual development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Becker, J. R. (1995). Women’s ways of knowing in mathematics. In P. Rogers & G. Kaiser (Eds.), Equity in mathematics education: Influences of feminism and culture (pp. 163–174). London: Falmer Press.
Becker, J. R. (1996). Research on gender and mathematics: One feminist perspective. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 18(1, 2, & 3), 19–25.
Becker, J. R., & Jacobs, J. E. (2001). Introduction. In W. G. Secada, J. E. Jacobs, J. R. Becker & G. F. Gilmer (Eds.), Changing the faces of mathematics: Perspectives on gender (pp. 1–7). Reston: NCTM.
Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. (1986/1997). Women’s ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind (2nd ed.). New York: Basic Books.
Bishop, A. P., & Bruce, B. C. (2001). Fostering community literacy. International Conference on Researching Literacy. Gevirtz Graduate School of Education, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.
Bishop, A. J., & Forgasz, H. J. (2007). Issues in access and equity in mathematics education. In F. K. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 1145–1167). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
Boaler, J. (1998). Experiencing school mathematics. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Boaler, J., & Staples, M. (2005). Transforming students’ lives through an equitable mathematics approach: The case of Railside School. Retrieved June 20, 2005, from http://www.stanford.edu/~joboaler/pubs.html.
Brew, C. (2001). Women, mathematics, and epistemology: An integrated framework. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 5(1), 15–32.
Buerk, D. (1996). Our open ears can open minds: Listening to women’s metaphors for mathematics. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 18(1, 2, & 3), 26–31.
Bureau of Labor Statistics (2004). National industry-occupation employment projections 2002–2012. Washington: U.S. Department of Labor.
Campbell, P. B. (1995). Redefining the “girl problem in mathematics”. In W. G. Secada, E. Fennema & L. B. Adajian (Eds.), New directions for equity in mathematics education (pp. 225–241). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Civil, M. (2002). Culture and mathematics: A community approach. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 23(2), 133–148.
Civil, M. (2007). Building on community knowledge: An avenue to equity in mathematics education. In N. Nasir & P. Cobb (Eds.), Improving access to mathematics: Diversity and equity in the classroom (pp. 105–117). New York: Teachers College Press.
Clinchy, B. (1989). On critical thinking and connected knowing. Liberal Education, 75(5), 14–19.
Clinkscales, G., & Zaslavsky, C. (1997). Integrating mathematics with community service. In J. Trentacosta & M. J. Kenney (Eds.), Multicultural and gender equity in the mathematics classroom: The gift of diversity, 1997 yearbook (pp. 107–114). Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Damarin, S. K. (1995). Gender and mathematics from a feminist standpoint. In W. G. Secada, E. Fennema & L. B. Adajian (Eds.), New directions for equity in mathematics education (pp. 242–257). New York: Cambridge University Press.
D’Ambrosio, U. (2006). The program Ethnomathematics: A theoretical basis of the dynamics of intra-cultural encounters. Journal of Mathematics and Culture, 1(1). Retrieved November 12, 2007, from http://www.ccd.rpi.edu/Eglash/nasgem/jmc/issue_1_1.html.
Fennema, E. (2000). Gender and mathematics: What is known and what do I wish was known? Paper presented at the 5th Annual Forum of the National Institute for Science Education, Detroit, MI, USA.
Forgasz, H., & Leder, G. (2001). “A + for girls, B for boys”: Changing perspectives on gender equity and mathematics. In B. Atweh, H. Forgasz & B. Nebres (Eds.), Sociocultural research on mathematics education (pp. 347–366). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Frankenstein, M. (1989). Relearning mathematics: A different third R—radical maths. London: Free Association Books.
Freire, P. (1970/2004). Pedagogy of the oppressed (30th Anniversary ed.). New York: Continuum.
Galotti, K. M., Clinchy, B. M., Ainsworth, K. H., Lavin, B., & Mansfield, A. F. (1999). A new way of assessing ways of knowing: The attitudes toward thinking and learning survey (ATTLS). Sex Roles, 40(9/10), 745–766.
Galotti, K. M., Drebus, D. W., & Reimer, R. L. (2001). Ways of knowing as learning styles: Learning MAGIC with a partner. Sex Roles, 44(7/8), 419–436.
Gellert, U., Jablonka, E., & Keitel, C. (2001). Mathematical literacy and common sense in mathematics education. In B. Atweh, H. Forgasz & B. Nebres (Eds.), Sociocultural research on mathematics education (pp. 57–73). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychology theory and women’s development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
González, N. (1995). Educational innovation: Learning from households. Practicing Anthropology, 17(3), 3–24.
Goodell, J. E., & Parker, L. H. (2001). Creating a connected, equitable mathematics classroom: Facilitating gender equity. In B. Atweh, H. Forgasz & B. Nebres (Eds.), Sociocultural research on mathematics education (pp. 411–431). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Goodlad, J. (2004). Fulfilling the public purpose of schooling. School Administrator, 61(5), 14–17. Retrieved November 17, 2007, from http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0JSD/is_5_61/ai_n6046265.
Gutstein, E. (2006). Reading and writing the world with mathematics: Toward a pedagogy for social justice. New York: Routledge.
Gutstein, E. (2007). “And that’s just how it starts”: Teaching mathematics and developing student agency. Teachers College Record, 109(2), 420–448.
Gutstein, E., & Peterson, B. (Eds.) (2005). Rethinking mathematics: Teaching social justice by the numbers. Milwaukee: Rethinking Schools.
Hadlock, C. R. (Ed.) (2005). Mathematics in service to the community: Concepts and models for service-learning in the mathematical sciences. Washington: The Mathematical Association of America.
Hart, D., Donnelly, T. M., Youniss, J., & Atkins, R. (2007). High school community service as a predictor of adult voting and volunteering. American Educational Research Journal, 44(1), 197–219.
Hart, S. M., & King, J. R. (2007). Service learning and literacy tutoring: Academic impact on pre-service teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(4), 323–338.
Jacobs, J. E. (1994). Feminist pedagogy and mathematics. ZDM, 26(1), 12–17.
Jacobs, J. E., & Becker, J. R. (1997). Creating a gender-equitable multicultural classroom using feminist pedagogy. In J. Trentacosta & M. J. Kenney (Eds.), Multicultural and gender equity in the mathematics classroom: The gift of diversity, 1997 yearbook (pp. 107–114). Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Kaiser, G., & Rogers, P. (1995). Introduction: Equity in mathematics education. In P. Rogers & G. Kaiser (Eds.), Equity in mathematics education: Influences of feminism and culture (pp. 1–10). New York: Routledge Falmer.
Keitel, C. (Ed.). (1998). Social justice and mathematics education: Gender, class, ethnicity and the politics of schooling. Berlin: Freie Universität.
Knight, K. M., Elfenbein, M. H., & Messina, J. A. (1995). A preliminary scale to measure connected and separate knowing: The knowing styles inventory. Sex Roles, 33(7/8), 499–513.
Ladson-Billings, G. (1997). It doesn’t add up: African American students’ mathematics achievement. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 697–708.
Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491.
Lamb, S. (1996). Gender differences in mathematics participation in Australian schools: Some relationships with social class and school policy. British Educational Research Journal, 22(2), 223–240.
Lamb, S. (1997). Gender differences in mathematics participation. Educational Studies, 23(1), 105–126.
Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics, and culture in everyday life. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Leder, G. C. (1992). Mathematics and gender: Changing perspectives. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 597–622). New York: Macmillan.
Leder, G. C., Forgasz, H. J., & Solar, C. (1996). Research and intervention programs in mathematics education: A gendered issue. In A. J. Bishop, K. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick & C. Laborde (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education (pp. 945–985). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Lim, J. H. (2004). Girls’ experiences in learning school mathematics. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 26(1), 43–60.
Lingard, B., Martino, W., Mills, M., & Bahr, M. (2002). Addressing the educational needs of boys. Research report submitted to the Australian Government Commonwealth Department of Education, Science, and Training, Canberra City, Australia. Retrieved November 2, 2007, from http://www.dest.gov.au/sectors/school_education/publications_resources/profiles/addressing_educational_needs_of_boys.htm.
Lopez-Claros, A., & Zahidi, S. (2006). Women’s empowerment: Measuring the global gender gap. Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum.
McGraw, R., Lubienski, S. T., & Strutchens, M. E. (2006). A closer look at gender in NAEP mathematics achievement and affect data: Intersections with achievement, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37(2), 129–150.
Moll, L. C. (1992). Bilingual classrooms and community analysis: Some recent trends. Educational Researcher, 21(2), 20–24.
Moll, L., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & González, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: A qualitative approach to developing strategic connections between homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31(2), 132–141.
Moll, L. C., & González, N. (2004). A funds-of-knowledge approach to multicultural education. In J. A. Banks & C. A. Banks (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (2nd ed., pp. 699–715). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Morrow, C. (1996). Women and mathematics: Avenues of connection. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 18(1, 2, & 3), 4–18.
Moses, R. P., & Cobb, C. E. (2001). Radical equations: Civil rights from Mississippi to the algebra project. Boston: Beacon Press.
National Center for Education Statistics (2007). Status and trends in the education of racial and ethnic minorities. NCES 2007–039: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved November 2, 2007, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2007039.
National Commission on Service-Learning (2002). Learning in deed: The power of service-learning for American schools. Battle Creek: W. K. Kellogg Foundation.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston: Author.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston: Author.
National Science Foundation (2006). Science and engineering indicators. Arlington: Author. Retrieved October 12, 2007, from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind06/.
Nunes, T., Schliemann, A., & Carraher, D. (1993). Street mathematics and school mathematics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Oakes, J., Joseph, R., & Muir, K. (2004). Access and achievement in mathematics and science. In J. A. Banks & C. A. M. Banks (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (2nd ed., pp. 69–90). New York: Jossey-Bass.
Riordan, J. E., & Noyce, P. E. (2001). The impact of two standards-based mathematics curricula on student achievement in Massachusetts. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(4), 368–398.
Rogers, P., & Kaiser, G. (Eds.) (1995). Equity in mathematics education: Influences of feminism and culture. New York: Routledge Falmer.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2002). Making mathematics work for all children: Issues of standards, testing, and equity. Educational Researcher, 31(1), 13–25.
Secada, W. G. (1992). Race, ethnicity, social class, language, and achievement in mathematics. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 623–660). New York: Macmillan.
Senk, S. L., & Thompson, D. R. (Eds.) (2003). Standards-based school mathematics curricula: What are they? What do students learn? Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Shor, I. (1999). What is critical literacy? Journal of Pedagogy, Pluralism, and Practice, 4(1). Retrieved November 12, 2007, from http://www.lesley.edu/journals/jppp/4/shor.html.
Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 417–453.
Skovsmose, O. (2004). Critical mathematics education for the future. Unpublished manuscript, Aalborg University. Retrieved April 14, 2007, from http://www.learning.aau.dk/en/department/staff/ole_skovsmose.htm.
Smith, D. E. (1974). Women’s perspective as a radical critique of sociology. Sociological Inquiry, 44(1), 7–13.
Spielman, L. J. (2006). Preservice teachers’ characterizations of the relationships between teacher education program components: Program meanings and relevance and socio-political school geographies. Blacksburg: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
Sriraman, B. (Ed.). (2007). International perspectives on social justice in mathematics education. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
Steen, L. A. (Ed.). (1997). Why numbers count: Quantitative literacy for tomorrow’s America. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
Stinson, D. W. (2004). Mathematics as ‘gate keeper’(?): Three theoretical perspectives that aim toward empowering all children with a key to the gate. The Mathematics Educator, 14(1), 8–18.
Turner, E. E., & Strawhun, B. T. F. (2005). With math, it’s like you have more defense. In E. Gutstein & B. Peterson (Eds.), Rethinking mathematics: Teaching social justice by the numbers (pp. 81–87). Milwaukee: Rethinking Schools.
Valero, P. (2001). Review of the book social justice and mathematics education: Gender, class, ethnicity and the politics of schooling. ZDM, 33(6), 187–191.
Weiner, G., Arnot, M., & David, M. (1997). Is the future female? Female success, male disadvantage, and changing gender patterns in education. In A. H. Halsey, P. Brown, H. Lauder & A. Stuart Wells (Eds.), Education, economy, culture, and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wyner, J. S., Bridgeland, J. M., & Diiulio, J. J. (2007). Achievement trap: How America is failing millions of high-achieving students from lower-income families. Lansdowne: Jack Kent Cooke Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Spielman, L.J. (2012). Equity in Mathematics Education: Unions and Intersections of Feminist and Social Justice Literature. In: Forgasz, H., Rivera, F. (eds) Towards Equity in Mathematics Education. Advances in Mathematics Education. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27702-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27702-3_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-27701-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-27702-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)