Abstract
Gilah Leder thoroughly reviews, within the constraints imposed by the structure of this volume, what seems to be a very rich but not fully institutionalized area of research enterprise. An important (and, probably, inevitable) decision about the reviewing strategy was “[not to attempt] to provide a unique definition of mathematically gifted students or its pseudonyms, [but to accept] the diversity of definitions used in different publications… at face value” (Leder, this volume, p. 390). As a result, the review includes publications that, generally speaking, are concerned with supporting or characterizing those students who seem to be insufficiently challenged by a regular mathematical curriculum or show at least above-average achievements when studying mathematics in different educational settings. In fact, the chapter invites the reader to critically consider whether such a broad population can be referred to as “mathematically gifted students” and, more importantly, whether results of numerous studies utilizing the term “mathematically gifted students” or its pseudonyms can be perceived as a body of accumulated knowledge or as “tantalizing allusions to the needs and development of mathematically gifted students” (Leder, this volume, p. 403).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Diezmann, C., & Watters, J. (2001). The collaboration of mathematically gifted students on challenging tasks. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 25(1), 7–31.
Gagné, F. (2011). Academic talent development and the equity issue in gifted education. Talent Development & Excellence, 3(1), 3–22.
Koichu, B. (2011). Overcoming a pitfall of circularity in research on problem solving by mathematically gifted schoolchildren. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 11(1), 67–77.
Koichu, B., & Orey, D. (2010). Creativity or ignorance: Inquiry in calculation strategies of mathematically disadvantaged (immigrant) high school students. Mediterranean Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 9(2), 75–92.
Leikin, R., Berman, A., & Koichu, B. (Eds.) (2009). Creativity in mathematics and the education of gifted students. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
NCTM (National Council of Teachers of Mathematics) (2000). Principles and standards for teaching mathematics. Reston: NCTM.
Sheffield, L. J. (Ed.) (1999). Developing mathematically promising students. Reston: NCTM.
Wenke, D., & French, P. (2003). Is success or failure at solving complex problems related to intellectual ability? In J. Davidson & R. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of problem solving (pp. 87–126). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Koichu, B. (2012). Commentary on the Chapter by Gilah Leder, “Looking for Gold: Catering for Mathematically Gifted Students Within and Beyond ZDM”. In: Forgasz, H., Rivera, F. (eds) Towards Equity in Mathematics Education. Advances in Mathematics Education. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27702-3_36
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27702-3_36
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-27701-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-27702-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)