Abstract
Numerous authors have suggested that omitted variables affect spatial regression methods less than ordinary least-squares (OLS; Dubin 1988; Brasington and Hite 2005, Cressie 1993). To explore these conjectures, we derive an expression for OLS omitted variable bias in a univariate model with spatial dependence in the disturbances and explanatory variables. There are a number of motivations for making this set of assumptions regarding the disturbances and explanatory variables. First, in spatial regression models each observation represents a region or point located in space, for example, census tracts, counties or individual houses. Sample data used as explanatory variables in these models typically consists of socioeconomic, census and other characteristics of the regional or point locations associated with each observation. Therefore, spatial dependence in the explanatory variables seems likely, motivating our choice of this assumption. Note, the literature rarely examines the spatial character of the explanatory variables, but this can affect the relative performance of OLS as shown below. Second, application of OLS models to regional data samples frequently leads to spatial dependence in the regression disturbances, providing a justification for this assumption. Finally, there are a host of latent unobservable and frequently unmeasurable influences that are likely to impact spatial regression relationships. For example, factors such as location and other types of amenities, highway accessibility, school quality or neighborhood prestige may exert an influence on the dependent variable in hedonic house price models. It is unlikely that explanatory variables are readily available to capture all of these types of latent influences. This type of reasoning motivates our focus on the impact of omitted explanatory variables. Since the omitted and included explanatory variables are both likely to exhibit spatial dependence based on the same spatial connectivity structure, it seems likely that omitted and included variables will exhibit non-zero covariance. The expression we derive for OLS bias in these circumstances shows that positive dependence in the disturbances and explanatory variables when omitted variables are correlated with included explanatory variables magnifies the magnitude of conventional least-squares omitted variables bias.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anselin L (1988) Spatial econometrics: methods and models. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Barry R, Pace RK (1999) A Monte Carlo estimator of the log determinant of large sparse matrices. Lin Algebra Appl 289:41–54
Brasington DM, Hite D (2005) Demand for environmental quality: a spatial hedonic analysis. Reg Sci Urban Econ 35:57–82
Cressie N (1993) Statistics for spatial data, Revised edition. Wiley, New York
Dubin R (1988) Estimation of regression coefficients in the presence of spatially autocorrelated error terms. Rev Econ Stat 70:466–474
Fingelton B, Le Gallo J (2009) Endogeneity in a spatial context: properties of estimators. In: Páez A, Le Gallo J, Buliung R, Dall’Erba S (eds) Progress in spatial analysis: methods and applications. Springer, Berlin: 59–73
Girard DA (1989) A fast Monte Carlo cross-validation procedure for large least squares problems with noisy data. Numer Math 56:1–23
Gradshteyn IS, Ryzhik IM (1980) Table of integrals, series, and products. Corrected and enlarged edition, Academic, Orlando
Kelejian HH, Prucha IR (1998) A generalized spatial two-stage least squares procedure for estimating a spatial autoregressive model with autoregressive disturbances. J R Estate Finance Econ 17:99–121
Kelejian HH, Prucha IR (2007) The relative efficiencies of various predictors in spatial econometric models containing spatial lags. Reg Sci Urban Econ 37:363–374
Lee LF (2004) Asymptotic distributions of quasi-maximum likelihood estimators for spatial econometric models. Econometrica 72:1899–1926
Lee ML, Pace RK (2005) Spatial distribution of retail sales. J R Estate Finance Econ 31:53–69
LeSage JP (1999) Spatial econometrics. Unpublished manuscript available at www.spatial-econometrics.com. Sept. 2009
LeSage JP, Pace RK (2007) A matrix exponential spatial specification. J Econom 140:190–214
LeSage JP, Pace RK (2009) Introduction to spatial econometrics. Taylor & Francis, New York, FL
Mardia KV, Marshall RJ (1984) Maximum likelihood estimation of models for residual covariance in spatial regression. Biometrika 71:135–146
Pace RK (1997) Performing large-scale spatial autoregressions. Econ Lett 54:283–291
Acknowledgements
Kelley Pace would like to acknowledge support from NSF SES-0729259 and from the Lousiana Sea grant program, while James LeSage is grateful for support from NSF SES-0729264 and the Texas Sea grant program. Both authors would like to thank Shuang Zhu and David Brasington for helpful comments on earlier versions of this chapter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pace, R.K., LeSage, J.P. (2010). Omitted Variable Biases of OLS and Spatial Lag Models. In: Páez, A., Gallo, J., Buliung, R., Dall'erba, S. (eds) Progress in Spatial Analysis. Advances in Spatial Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03326-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03326-1_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-03324-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-03326-1
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)