Abstract
Occupational airborne irritant (frictional and/or chemical) contact dermatitis is due to fibers, dust particles, vapors, and/or gasses.
Occupational airborne allergic contact dermatitis is a common problem, provoked by a large variety of allergens.
Occupational airborne phototoxic and/or photoallergic contact dermatitis is a rare, but well documented event.
Occupational airborne immunological contact urticaria can be caused by several chemicals and/or proteins. Allergy to latex proteins is the main problem.
“Extrinsic” atopic dermatitis (face and neck dermatitis) is related to the penetration into the skin of aeroallergens, particularly dust mite.
There is a vast range of procedures available to reach a proper etiological diagnosis of airborne contact dermatitis.
Prevention and treatment of airborne contact dermatitis deserve special attention, and must be adapted to each individual situation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Agarwal KK, D’Souza M (2009) Airborne contact dermatitis induced by parthenium: a study of 50 cases in South India. Clin Exp Dermatol 34:4–6
Baeck M, Goossens A (2009) Patients with airborne sensitization/contact dermatitis from budesonide-containing aerosols “by proxy”. Contact Dermatitis 61:1–8
Björnberg A, Lowhagen G, Tengberg JE (1979) Relationship between intensities of skin test reactions to glass fibers and chemical irritants. Contact Dermatitis 5:171–174
Bordel-Gomez MT, Miranda-Romero A (2008) Fibreglass dermatitis: a report of 2 cases. Contact Dermatitis 59:120–122
Cao LY, Sood A, Taylor JS (2009) Hand/face/neck localized pattern: sticky problems-resins. Dermatol Clin 27:227–249
Coenraads PJ, Brouwer A, Olie K et al (1994) Chloracne. Some recent issues. Dermatol Clin 12:569–576
Corazza M, Baldo F, Osti F et al (2008) Airborne allergic contact dermatitis due to budesonide from professional exposure. Contact Dermatitis 58:318–319
Cusano F, Mariano M (2007) Fiberglass dermatitis: microepidemic in a primary school. Contact Dermatitis 57:351–352
Dooms-Goossens A, Debusschere KM, Gevers DM et al (1986) Contact dermatitis caused by airborne agents. J Am Acad Dermatol 15:1–10
Feser A, Mahler V (2009) Periorbital dermatitis: causes, differential diagnosis and therapy. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 8:159–166
Fisher AA (1982) Fiberglass vs. mineral wool (rockwool) dermatitis. Cutis 29:415–416
Geraut C, Tripodi D, Brunet-Courtois B et al (2009) Occupational dermatitis to epoxydic and phenolic resins. Eur J Dermatol 19:205–213
Gottschling S, Meyer S, Dill-Mueller D et al (2007) Outbreak report of airborne caterpillar dermatitis in a kindergarten. Dermatology 215:5–9
Hallai N, Gawkrodger DJ (2009) Patch testing to aeroallergens, especially house dust mite, is often positive in atopics with eczema of the face and hands. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 23:728–729
Handfield-Jones SE (1998) Latex allergy in health-care workers in a English district general hospital. Br J Dermatol 138:273–276
Hsieh MY, Guo YL, Shiao JS et al (2001) Morphology of glass fibers in electronics workers with fiberglass dermatitis – a scanning electron microscopy study. Int J Dermatol 40:258–261
Kean T, Mc Nally M (2009) Latex hypersensitivity: a closer look at considerations for dentistry. J Can Dent Assoc 75:279–282
Koh D, Aw TC, Foulds IS (1992) Fibreglass dermatitis from printed circuit boards. Am J Ind Med 21:193–198
Lachapelle JM (1986) Industrial airborne irritant or allergic contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 14:137–145
Lachapelle JM (1987) Industrial airborne irritant contact dermatitis due to dust particles. Boll Dermatol Allerg Profes 2:83–89
Lachapelle JM (2006) Airborne Irritant Dermatitis. In: Chew AL, Maibach HI (eds) Irritant dermatitis. Springer, Berlin
Lachapelle JM (2009) Eczémas “systémiques”. In: Saurat JH, Lachapelle JM, Lipsker D, Thomas L (eds) Dermatologie et infections sexuellement transmissibles. Masson, Paris, pp 65–66
Lachapelle JM, Gouverneur JC, Boulet M et al (1977) A modified technique (using polyester tape) of skin surface biopsy. Br J Dermatol 97:49–52
Lachapelle JM, Mahmoud G, Van Herle R (1984) Anhydrite dermatitis in coal mines: an airborne irritant reaction assessed by laser Doppler flowmetry. Contact Dermatitis 11:188–189
Lachapelle JM, Frimat P, Tennstedt D et al (1992) Précis de Dermatologie Professionnelle et de l’Environnement. Masson, Paris, pp 107–111
Lagier F, Badier M, Martigny J et al (1990) Latex as aeroallergen. Lancet 336:516–517
Le Coz CJ, Coninx D, Van Rengen A et al (1999) An epidemic of occupational contact dermatitis from an immersion oil for microscopy in laboratory personnel. Contact Dermatitis 40:77–83
Legatt PA, Smith DR (2006) Dermatitis and aircrew. Contact Dermatitis 54:1–4
Lidén C, Lundgren L, Skare L et al (1998) A new whole-body exposure chamber for human skin and lung challenge experiments – the generation of wheat flour aerosols. Ann Occup Hyg 42:541–547
Mancuso G, Berdondini RM (2008) Occupational conjunctivitis as the sole manifestation of airborne contact allergy to trimethylolpropane triacrylate contained in a UV-cured paint. Contact Dermatitis 59:372–373
Marks R, Dawber RPR (1971) Skin surface biopsy: an improved technique for the examination of the horny layer. Br J Dermatol 84:117–123
Noe R, Cohen AL, Lederman E et al (2007) Skin disorders among construction workers following Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane Rita: an outbreak investigation in New Orleans, Louisiana. Arch Dermatol 143:1393–1398
Patiwael JA, Wintzen M, Rustemeyer T et al (2005) Airborne irritant contact dermatitis due to synthetic fibres from an air-conditioning filter. Contact Dermatitis 52:126–129
Pirilä V (1950) Thiokol as a frequent cause of dermatitis. Acta Allerg 3:319–328
Pirilä V, Noro L, Laamen A (1963) Air pollution and allergy. Acta Allerg 18:113–130
Pontén A (2006) Airborne occupational contact dermatitis caused by extremely low concentrations of budesonide. Contact Dermatitis 55:121–124
Samochocki Z (2007) Hypersensitivity to aeroallergens in adult patients with atopic dermatitis develops due to different immunological mechanisms. Eur J Dermatol 17:520–524
Santos R, Goossens A (2007) An update on airborne contact dermatitis: 2001–2006. Contact Dermatitis 57:353–360
Sharma VK, Sethuraman G (2007) Parthenium dermatitis. Dermatitis 18:183–190
Shkalim V, Herskovici Z, Amir J et al (2008) Systemic allergic reaction to tree processionary caterpillar in children. Pediatr Emerg Care 24:233–235
Stam-Westerveld EB (1997) Man-made mineral fibres: glasvezel- en steenwoldermatitis. Ned Tijdschr Dermatol Venereol 7:196–198
Stam-Westerveld EB, Coenraads PJ, van der Valk PJ et al (1994) Rubbing test responses of the skin to man-made mineral fibres of different diameters. Contact Dermatitis 31:1–4
Thune P (1977) Contact allergy due to lichens in patients with a history of photosensitivity. Contact Dermatitis 3:267–272
Verma KK, Mahesh R, Strivastava P et al (2008) Azathioprine versus betamethasone for the treatment of parthenium dermatitis: a randomized controlled study. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 74:453–457
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this entry
Cite this entry
Lachapelle, JM. (2012). Airborne Contact Dermatitis. In: Rustemeyer, T., Elsner, P., John, SM., Maibach, H.I. (eds) Kanerva's Occupational Dermatology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02035-3_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02035-3_17
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-02034-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-02035-3
eBook Packages: MedicineReference Module Medicine