Skip to main content

Relevance Theory

  • Chapter
Handbuch Pragmatik

Zusammenfassung

Relevance theory is a cognitively-oriented pragmatic theory that aims at providing a psychologically realistic account of utterance interpretation. Originally developed by Dan Sperber and Deirdre Wilson (1995), it has in the last few decades been one of the leading frameworks for pragmatics research. In this chapter, I first present relevance theory’s central claims and explain the motivations for them. I then review some of the main applications of relevance theory (linguistic underdetermination, the explicit-implicit distinction, lexical pragmatics and procedural meaning), and discuss some questions that are the focus of current research in these areas, both from within relevance theory and by advocates of alternative approaches such as semantic minimalism or indexicalism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Bezuidenhout, Anne (2002): Truth-conditional pragmatics. In: Philosophical Perspectives 16, 105–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blakemore, Diane (1987): Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borg, Emma (2016): Exploding explicatures. In: Mind & Language 31, 335–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carston, Robyn (2002): Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carston, Robyn (2012): Word meaning and concept expressed. In: The Linguistic Review 29, 607–623.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carston, Robyn (2013): Word meaning, what is said and explicature. In: Carlo Penco/Filipo Domaneschi (ed.): What Is Said and What Is Not. Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, Jerry (1998): Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong. Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, Ray (1994): The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language and Understanding. Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H. Paul (1989): Logic and conversation. William James lectures, Harvard University. In: H. Paul Grice (ed.): Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jary, Mark (2016): Rethinking explicature. In: Journal of Pragmatics 102, 24–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, Jerrold J. (1972): Semantic Theory. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neale, Stephen (2007): On location. In: Michael O’Rourke/Corey Washington (ed.): Situating Semantics: Essays in Honor of John Perry. Cambridge, Mass, 251–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Recanati, François (2004): Literal Meaning. Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasamoto, Ryoko/Wilson, Deidre (ed.) (2016): Little words: Communication and procedural meaning. In: Lingua 175–176, 1–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, John (1980): The background of meaning. In: John Searle/Ferenc Kiefer/Manfred Bierwisch (ed.): Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics. Dordrecht, 221–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, Dan (2000): Metarepresentations in an evolutionary perspective. In: Dan Sperber (ed.): Metarepresentations: An Evolutionary Perspective. Oxford, 117–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, Dan/Wilson, Deirdre (1995): Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, Dan/Wilson, Deirdre (1998): The mapping between the mental and the public lexicon. In: Peter Carruthers/Jill Boucher (ed.): Language and Thought: Interdisciplinary Themes. Cambridge, 184–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, Jason (2007): Language in Context. Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wharton, Tim (2009): Pragmatics and Nonverbal Communication. Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Deirdre (1994): Relevance and understanding. In: Gillian Brown/Kirsten Malmkjaer/Alastair Pollitt et al. (ed.): Language and Understanding. Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Deirdre (2011): The conceptual-procedural distinction: past, present and future. In: Victoria Escandell-Vidal/Manuel Leonotti/Aoife Ahern (ed.): Procedural Meanings: Problems and Perspectives. Bingley, 3–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Deirdre/Sperber, Dan (1993): Linguistic form and relevance. In: Lingua 90, 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Deirdre/Sperber, Dan (2004): Relevance theory. In: Laurence R. Horn/Gregory Ward (ed.): The Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford, 607–632.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hall, A. (2018). Relevance Theory. In: Liedtke, F., Tuchen, A. (eds) Handbuch Pragmatik. J.B. Metzler, Stuttgart. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-04624-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-04624-6_8

  • Publisher Name: J.B. Metzler, Stuttgart

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-476-04623-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-476-04624-6

  • eBook Packages: J.B. Metzler Humanities (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics