Skip to main content

Human Factors and Ergonomics’ Contribution to the Definition of a New Concept of Operations: The Case of Innovative Small Modular Reactors

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018) (IEA 2018)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 822))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2123 Accesses

Abstract

Contributing to the earliest phases of design is an old challenge of Human Factors and Ergonomics (HF&E) experts. If HF&E contributions to Basic Design and Detailed Design of Nuclear Power Plants is acknowledge, HF&E experts’ contributions to earlier phase of design like Conceptual Design or pre-conceptual design (PCD) are not frequent. Therefore, if participation of HF&E experts to the earliest phase of systems design is not new, up to our knowledge, there is no already described, validated and structured HF&E method to contribute to a pre-conceptual design (PCD) phase. The aim of the PCD phase is to prepare and address the scientific issues of a proposed new design. From an HF&E point of view, the scientific issues are related to the concept of operations envisioned for the new system. The paper presents the approach we are currently leading at EDF R&D during the PCD phase of the design of innovative small modular reactors (ISMR) in order to define its concept of operations. This approach is based on several methods we propose to articulate in order to contribute to fill the lack of described and validated HF&E method to contribute to PCD. The theoretical foundations of our approach are based on work analyses in reference work situations [1] and operational analysis [2]. The paper describes each step of the approach developed and the organizational conditions for the participation of HF&E experts into PCD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    PCD is similar to NASA’s «concept studies» [7].

  2. 2.

    This part of analysis is similar to what [2] calls «operational analysis».

References

  1. Daniellou F (2004) L’ergonomie dans la conduite de projets de conception de systèmes de travail. In: Falzon P (ed) Ergonomie. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, pp 359–373

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chapanis A (1996) Human Factors in Systems Engineering. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hendrick HW (2008) Applying ergonomics to systems: some documented “lessons learned”. Appl. Ergon. 39:418–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Blanchard BS, Fabrycky WJ (2010) Systems Engineering and Analysis, 5th edn. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  5. O’Hara JM, Higgins JC, Fleger SA, Pieringer PA (2012) Human Factors Engineering Program Review Model (NUREG-0711, rev.3), U.S. NRC

    Google Scholar 

  6. Delbecq J (2012) Les Small Modular Reactors (SMR). Annales des mines – réalités industrielles (3):133–141. https://doi.org/10.3917/rindu.123.0133

  7. NASA (2007) Systems engineering handbook (NASA/SP-2007-6105, rev 1). National Aeronautics and Space Industry, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  8. Daniellou F, Rabardel P (2005) Activity-oriented approaches to ergonomics: some traditions and communities. Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. 6:353–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Leplat J (1990) Relations between task and activity: elements for elaborating a framework for error analysis. Ergonomics 33:1389–1402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hacker W (1985) Activity: a fruitful concept in industrial psychology. In: Frese Michael, Sabini John (eds) Goal Directed Behavior: The Concept of Action in Psychology. L. Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, pp 262–284

    Google Scholar 

  11. Leplat J, Cuny X (1974) Les Accidents du Travail. PUF, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  12. Carroll JM (2000) Making Use: Scenario-Based Design of Human–Computer Interactions. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MA

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stanislas Couix .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Couix, S., Kahn, J. (2019). Human Factors and Ergonomics’ Contribution to the Definition of a New Concept of Operations: The Case of Innovative Small Modular Reactors. In: Bagnara, S., Tartaglia, R., Albolino, S., Alexander, T., Fujita, Y. (eds) Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018). IEA 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 822. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96077-7_82

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics