Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Health and Wellbeing in Modern Office Layouts: The Case of Agile Workspaces in Green Buildings

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018) (IEA 2018)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 825))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

At this moment in time, there exists the opportunity not only to report the effects of what exists within the workspace and its changing nature, but to influence the redesign, development, and implementation of the workplace and its environmental factors (Davis et al. 2011). With the change in the nature of work, the spaces in which work is done have also changed. Such a change is partly due to the recent trend of designing and operating energy efficient green buildings. As green building standards require improvements to attributes of indoor environment quality, it is claimed that green buildings improve the health, productivity, and comfort of their occupants. The current research was part of a preparatory study conducted at a large South African organisation before they moved to their new green building. This research investigates how the different existing types of workplace layout, including agile workspaces, impacted on elements of the perceived comfort, health and satisfaction of the employees.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen JG, MacNaughton P, Satish U, Santanam S, Vallarino J, Spengler JD (2016) Associations of cognitive function scores with carbon dioxide, ventilation, and volatile organic compound exposures in office workers: a controlled exposure study of green and conventional office environments. Environ Health Perspect 124(6):805–812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altomonte S, Schiavon S (2013) Occupant satisfaction in LEED and non-LEED certified buildings. Build Environ 68:66–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altomonte S, Schiavon S (2014) Influence of factors unrelated to environmental quality on occupant satisfation in LEED and non-LEED ceertified buildings. Build Environ 77:148–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldry C, Barnes A (2012) The open-plan academy: space, control and the undermining of professional identity. Work Employ Soc 26(2):228–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergs J (2002) Effect of healthy workplaces on well-being and productivity of office workers. In: Proceedings of International Plants for People Symposium, June 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodin-Danielsson C, Bodin L (2008) Office type in relation to health, well-being, and job satisfaction among employees. Environ Behav 40(5):636–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bos N, Molinaro K, Perrone A, Sharer K, Greenberg A (2017) Workplace satisfaction before and after move to an open plan office - including interactions with gender and introversion. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, pp 455–460

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourbeau J, Brisson C, Allaire S (1997) Prevalence of the sick building syndrome symptoms in office workers before and six months and three years after being exposed to a building with an improved ventilation system. Occup Environ Med 54:49–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan A, Chugh JS, Kline T (2002) Traditional versus open office design: a longitudinal field study. Environ Behav 34(3):279–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Candido C, Zhang J, Kim J, de Dear R, Thomas L, Strapasson P, Joko C (2016) Impact of workspace layout on occupant satisfaction, perceived health and productivity. In: Proceedings of 9th Windsor Conference: Making Comfort Relevant. Cumberland Lodge, Windsor, UK, 7–10 April 2016, pp 1214–1225

    Google Scholar 

  • Danna K, Griffin RW (1999) Health and well-being in the workplace: a review and synthesis of the literature. J Manag 25(3):357–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis MC, Leach DJ, Clegg CW (2011) The physical environment of the office: contemporary and ethical issues. Int Rev Ind Org Psychol 26:193–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson A, Steele EJ, Hodges PW, Stewart S (2009) Development and test-retest reliability of an extended version of the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire (NMQ-E): a screening instrument for musculoskeletal pain. J Pain 10(5):517–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Been I, Beijer M (2014) The influence of office type on satisfaction and perceived productivity support. J Facil Manag 12(2):142–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Croon E, Sluiter J, Kuijer PP, Frings-Dresen M (2005) The effect of office concepts on worker health and performance: a systematic review of the literature. Ergonomics 48(2):119–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer GN, Tarquinio C, Vischer JC (2004) Effects of the self-schema on perception of space at work. J Environ Psychol 24:131–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischl G, Varkevisser M, Gärling A, Keyson D (2007) The restorative potential of a built environment: development and evaluation of a research based design. In: Smart surroundings moving forward. Twente University of Technology, Enschede

    Google Scholar 

  • Frontczak M, Wargocki P (2011) Human comfort and self-estimated performance in relation to indoor environmental parameters and building features. DTU civil engineering report, no. R-260. Department of Civil Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Denmark

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghodrati N, Samari M, Shafiei MWM (2012) Green building impacts on occupant’s health and productivity. J Appl Sci Res 8(8):4235–4241

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedge A, Dorsey JA (2011) The Ithaca College green building environmental survey. http://ergo.human.cornell.edu/AHSurveys/icgbs2011r.htm

  • Hedge A, Dorsey JA (2013) Green buildings need good ergonomics. Ergonomics 56(3):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeling T, Clements-Croone D, Roesch E (2015) The effect of agile workspace and remote working on experiences of privacy. Crowding Satisfaction Build 5(3):880–898

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim J, de Dear R (2013) Workspace satisfaction: the privacy-communication trade-off in open-plan offices. J Environ Psychol 36:18–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klitzman S, Stellman JM (1989) The impact of the physical environment on the psychological well-being of office workers. Soc Sci Med 29(6):733–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee SY, Brand JL (2005) Effects of control over office workspace on perceptions of the work environment and work outcomes. J Environ Psychol 25:323–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee SY (2010) Office layout affecting privacy, interaction, and acoustic quality in LEED-certified buildings. Build Environ 45:1594–1600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire D, McLaren L (2008) The impact of physical environment on employee commitment in call centres: the mediating role of employee well-being. Team Perf Manag Int J 15(1/2):35–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkin JK, Austin SA, Pinder JA, Baguley TS, Allenby SN (2011) Balancing collaboration and privacy in academic workplaces. Facilities 29(1):31–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrin Jegen N, Chevret P (2017) Effect of noise on comfort in open plan offices: application of an assessment questionnaire. Ergonomics 60(1):6–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson M, Amick BC III, DeRango K, Rooney T, Bazzani L, Harrist R, Moore A (2009) The effects of an office ergonomics training and chair intervention on worker knowledge, behavior and musculoskeletal risk. Appl Ergon 40:124–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson MM, O’Neill MJ (2003) Reducing musculoskeletal discomfort: effects of an office ergonomics workplace and training intervention. Int J Occup Saf Ergon 9(4):491–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh A, Syal M, Grady SC, Korkmaz S (2010) Effects of green buildings on employee health and productivity. Am J Public Health 100(9):1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tennant R, Hiller L, Fishwick R, Platt S, Joseph S, Weich S, Parkinson J, Secker J, Stewart-Brown S (2007) The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validation. Health Qual Life Outcomes 5(1):63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tham KW, Wargocki P, Tan YF (2015) Indoor environmental quality, occupant perception, prevalence of sick building syndrome symptoms, and sick leave in a Green Mark Platinum-rated versus a non-Green Mark-rated building: a case study. Sci Technol Built Environ 21(1):35–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thatcher A (2013) Green ergonomics: definition and scope. Ergonomics 56(3):389–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thatcher A, Milner K (2014) Changes in productivity, psychological wellbeing and physical wellbeing from working in a ‘green’ building. Work 49:381–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Vischer JC (2005) Space meets status: designing workplace performance. Routledge, Oxon

    Google Scholar 

  • Vischer JC (2007) The concept of environmental comfort in workplace performance. Ambiente’ Construido 7(1):21–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Veitch JA, Charles KE, Farley KMJ, Newsham GR (2007) A model of satisfaction with open-plan office conditions: COPE field findings. J Environ Psychol 27:177–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Psychology Department, University of the Witwatersrand, WITS, Johannesburg, South Africa

    Keren-Amy Laughton & Andrew Thatcher

Authors
  1. Keren-Amy Laughton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andrew Thatcher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keren-Amy Laughton .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of the Republic of San Marino, San Marino, San Marino

    Sebastiano Bagnara

  2. Centre for Clinical Risk Management and Patient Safety, Tuscany Region, Florence, Italy

    Riccardo Tartaglia

  3. Centre for Clinical Risk Management and Patient Safety, Tuscany Region, Florence, Italy

    Sara Albolino

  4. Fraunhofer FKIE, Bonn, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany

    Thomas Alexander

  5. International Ergonomics Association, Tokyo, Japan

    Yushi Fujita

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Laughton, KA., Thatcher, A. (2019). Health and Wellbeing in Modern Office Layouts: The Case of Agile Workspaces in Green Buildings. In: Bagnara, S., Tartaglia, R., Albolino, S., Alexander, T., Fujita, Y. (eds) Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018). IEA 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 825. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96068-5_89

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation