Skip to main content

Dynamic Adjustment of Interpersonal Distance in Cooperative Task

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 827))

Abstract

This paper presented an empirical study which investigated a dynamic adjustment of interpersonal distance in a cooperative situation. In the experiment, three factors of the “task”, “orientation”, and “gender combination” were emphasized. Ninety-six data of interpersonal distances were obtained under four different conditions from twenty-four participants.

First, ANOVA and multiple comparisons revealed that the factors of the “task”, “orientation”, and “gender combination” had statistically significant influences on the adjustment of interpersonal distance. In particular, the results indicated that (1) preferred interpersonal distances were shortened when a dyad initiated a “cooperative task”, (2) preferred interpersonal distance of “side-by-side” was shorter than “face-to-face”, and (3) interpersonal distance of “female-female” pair was shorter than “male-male” pair and it was also shorter than “heterogeneous gender” pair.

Furthermore, correlation analyses, under “face-to-face” condition, revealed that, (1) evaluators who had longer interpersonal distances of “no task” shortened larger amount of their interpersonal distances when a dyad initiated a cooperation, and more interestingly, (2) a larger divergence of preferred interpersonal distances of “no task” condition among each dyad derived a larger amount of shortening of interpersonal distance when a dyad initiated a cooperation. The result also suggested that interpersonal distance of an evaluator and an approacher had a significant correlation under “cooperative task” condition.

Finally, beyond a self-centered view of personal space, this paper suggested an interesting view of phenomenon of adjusting interpersonal distance, from a dynamic interactive process of an evaluator and a confederate. An implication to the design of spatial behavior of social assistive robots was also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Aiello JR (1987) Human spatial behavior. In: Stokels D, Altman I (eds) Handbook of environmental psychology. Wiley, New York, pp 385–504

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dorsey M, Meisels M (1969) Personal space and self-protection. J Pers Soc Psychol 11:93–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Evans GW, Lepore SJ, Schroeder A (1996) The role of interior design elements in human responses to crowding. J Pers Soc Psychol 70:41–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Garzotto F, Gelsomini M, Kinoe Y (2017) Puffy: a mobile inflatable interactive companion for children with neurodevelopmental disorder. In: Bernhaupt R (eds) Human-computer interaction - INTERACT 2017, Lecture notes in computer science, vol 10514. Springer, pp 467–492

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gifford R (1982) Projected interpersonal distances and orientation choices: personality, sex, and social situation. Soc Psychol Q 45:145–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hayduk LA (1983) Personal space: where we now stand. Psychol Bull 94(2):293–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Horowitz MJ, Duff DF, Stratton LO (1964) Body-buffer zone: exploration of personal space. Arch Gen Psychiatry 11:651–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kinoe Y, Mizuno N (2015) Situational transformation of personal space. In: Yamamoto S (eds) Human interface and the management of information, Information and knowledge in context, Lecture notes in computer science, vol 9173. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 15–24

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kinoe Y (2018) Interpersonal distancing in cooperation. In: Proceedings of the 20th international conference on human-computer interaction (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mead R, Matarić MJ (2017) Autonomous human–robot proxemics: socially aware navigation based on interaction potential. Auton Robot 41(5):1189–1201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rosenfeld P, Giacalone R, Kennedy J (1987) Of status and suits: personal space invasions in an administrative setting. Soc Behav Pers 15:97–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sinha SP, Mukherjee N (1995) The effect of perceived cooperation on personal space requirements. J Soc Psychol 136(5):655–657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sommer R (2002) Personal space in a digital age. In: Bechtel RB, Churchman A (eds) Handbook of environmental psychology. Wiley, New York, pp 385–504

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sommer R: Personal space: the behavioral basis of design. Bosko Books (2008). Updated

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tedesco JF, Fromme DK (1974) Cooperation, competition, and personal space. Sociometry 37:116–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We thank all the study participants, and Namiko M., who devotedly supported for conducting experiments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yosuke Kinoe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kinoe, Y. (2019). Dynamic Adjustment of Interpersonal Distance in Cooperative Task. In: Bagnara, S., Tartaglia, R., Albolino, S., Alexander, T., Fujita, Y. (eds) Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018). IEA 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 827. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96059-3_37

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics