Abstract
To attain an objective truth regarding languages, without breaking with their lived reality, is indeed the greatest ambition of semiolinguistic knowledge—or at least what it should be, in that it would respect the essential interiority of its object without sacrificing anything of empirical rationality.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
As emphasized by Mesure (1990, p. 203): “[Dilthey acknowledges] the necessity, in the field of the mind, of articulating the explanational or causalistic approach with a comprehensive or hermeneutical approach.”
- 2.
PW, p. 51.
- 3.
“Malraux sometimes speaks as if the senses and sense-data had never varied throughout the centuries and as if the classical perspective was imperative so long as it referred to them” (PW, p. 51).
- 4.
PW, p. 51.
- 5.
Ibid., p. 52.
- 6.
Kearney (2013, p. 189).
References
Bach, E. (1973). Introduction aux grammaires transformationnelles. Paris: Armand Colin, coll. Linguistique.
Berrendonner, A. (1983). Cours critique de grammaire générative. Lyon: Presses Universitaires de Lyon.
Kearney, R. (2013). Écrire la chair: l’expression diacritique chez Merleau-Ponty. Chiasmi International, 15, 183–196.
Mesure, S. (1990). Dilthey et la fondation des sciences historiques. Paris: PUF.
Milner, J.-C. (1989). Introduction à une science du langage. Paris: Le Seuil, coll. Des Travaux.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Piotrowski, D. (2018). Conclusion. In: Morphogenesis of the Sign. Lecture Notes in Morphogenesis. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89848-3_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89848-3_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-89847-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-89848-3
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)