Abstract
For over 20 years, the concept of the virtual has prevailed in French digital studies. Yet two decades of daily cultural integration with interfaces have demonstrated that virtuality is only one of many aspects of our interactive experience with digital devices. A need therefore exists for new concepts more apt to address the philosophical complexity of the digital phenomenon and the significance of our interactions with calculated matter as they are true existential experiences of phenomenological significance. In this chapter I explain why I have suggested introducing the phenomenological concept of ontophany (manifestation of being). In close relationship with a comprehensive and broadened understanding of Bachelard’s notion of “phenomenotechnique,” I examine the hitherto unidentified technicality of this manifestation process. Prior to their existence as tools in uses, technologies are first the perceptual structure of our existence; they are the “devices” or the invisible matrixes, produced by culture and history, into which our potential experience-of-the-world is cast. Not only do the following theoretical propositions seek to contribute, philosophically, to Internet Studies and to a better understanding the Digital Age, they also hope to give rise to a broader deliberation on technology and perception, as they relate to an approach I would characterize as a historical phenomenology of technology.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Until now, French digital studies have been developed outside of the field of philosophy, with a loose, and often awkward, appropriation of the latter’s concepts.
- 2.
One must not mistake the notion of ontophany as we suggest it here with that of “technophany,” dear to Gilbert Simondon, whose elaboration was also based upon Mircea Eliade.
References
Bachelard, G. (1931–1932). Noumène et microphysique. Recherches philosophiques, I, 1931–1932, pp. 55–65. In Bachelard, G. (1970). Études. Paris: Vrin.
Bachelard, G. (1933). Les Intuitions atomistiques. Paris: Boivin.
Bachelard, G. (1934). Le Nouvel Esprit scientifique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, Quadrige. English edition: Bachelard, G. (1984). The New Scientific Spirit (trans: Goldhammer, A.). Boston: Beacon Press.
Bachelard, G. (1938a). La Formation de l’esprit scientifique. Paris: Vrin. English edition: Bachelard, G. (2002). The Formation of the Scientific Mind: A Contribution to a Psychoanalysis of Objective Knowledge (trans: McAllester Jones, M.). Manchester: Clinamen Press.
Bachelard, G. (1938b). Psychanalyse du feu. Paris: Editions Gallimard, Folio. English edition: Bachelard, G. (1987). The Psychoanalysis of Fire (trans: Ross, C. M.). Boston: Beacon Press.
Bachelard, G. (1951). L’Activité rationaliste de la physique contemporaine. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Dennett, D. C. (1992). Consciousness explained. New York: Back Bay Books.
Eliade, M. (1965). Le Sacré et le Profane. Paris: Gallimard. English edition: Eliade, M. (1987). The Sacred and the Profane: The Nature of Religion (trans: Trask, W. R.). Harvest/HBJ Publishers.
Genvo, S. (2011). Penser les phénomènes de “ludicisation” du numérique: pour une théorie de la jouabilité. Revue des sciences sociales, n°45.
Floridi, L. (2017). The Unsustainable Fragility of the Digital, and What to Do About It. Philosophy & Technology 30(3), 259–261.
Gille, B. (1978). Histoire des techniques. Paris: Editions Gallimard, Bibliothèque de la Pléiade.
Gille, B. (1979). La notion de “système technique” (essai d’épistémologie technique). Culture technique, n°1, Centre de recherche sur la culture technique, Neuilly-sur-Seine.
Ihde, D. (1990). Technology and the lifeworld: From garden to earth. Bloomington/Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Jurgenson, N. (2012). When atoms meet bits: Social media, the mobile web and augmented revolution. Future Internet, 4, 83–91.
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Lecourt, D. (1969). L’épistémologie historique de Gaston Bachelard. Paris: Vrin.
Lévy, P. (1992). De la programmation comme un des beaux-arts. Paris: Editions La DÉcouverte.
Lévy, P. (1995). Qu’est-ce que le virtuel? Paris: Editions La DÉcouverte.
Leyens, S. (2000). La conscience imaginée. Sur l’éliminativisme de Daniel Dennett. Revue philosophique de Louvain, 98(98–4), 761–782.
Manovich, L. (2013). Software takes command. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Missonnier, S., and Lisandre, H. (Eds.). (2003). Le Virtuel: la présence de l’absent. Paris: EDK.
Moggridge, B. (2007). Designing interactions. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Mumford, L. (1934). Technics and civilization (2010th ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Nagel, T. (1974). What is it like to be a bat? The Philosophical Review, LXXXIII(4), 435–450.
Petit, V. (2013). Le concept de milieu en amont et en aval de Simondon. Cahiers Simondon, n°5, Paris: L’Harmattan.
Quéau, P. (1993). Le Virtuel: vertus et vertiges. Seyssel: Champ Vallon, coll. Milieux.
Simondon, G. (1958). Du Mode d’existence des objets techniques. Paris: Aubier. English edition: Simondon, G. (2016). On the Mode of Existence of Technical Objects (trans: Malaspina, C.). Minneapolis: Univocal Publishing.
Simondon, G. (1960–1961). Psycho-sociologie de la technicité. In Simondon, G. (2014). Sur la technique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Tisseron, S. (2008). Virtuel, mon amour: penser, aimer, souffrir, à l’ère des nouvelles technologies. Paris: Albin Michel.
Tisseron, S. (2012). Rêver, fantasmer, virtualiser. Du virtuel psychique au virtuel numérique. Paris: Dunod.
Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen. Identity in the age of the internet. New York: Simon & Schuster Paperbacks.
Uexküll Von, J. (2010 [1934]). A foray into the world of animals and humans: With a theory of meaning. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Vial, S. (2013). L'être et l’écran: comment le numérique change la perception. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Vial, S. (2014a). Pour introduire le “playsir”: pourquoi les appareils numériques sont “ludogènes”. Interfaces numériques, 3(1), 149–161.
Vial, S. (2014b). Ce que le numérique change à autrui: introduction à la fabrique phénoménotechnique de l’altérité. Hermès, 1(68), 151–157.
Acknowledgements
A preliminary version of this text has been discussed by Victor Petit and Ronan Le Roux during the authors’ workshop held in Paris Sorbonne on 22–23 June 2015 for the preparation of the collective book.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vial, S. (2018). Ontophany Theory: Historical Phenomenology of Technology and the Digital Age. In: Loeve, S., Guchet, X., Bensaude Vincent, B. (eds) French Philosophy of Technology. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol 29. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89518-5_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89518-5_23
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-89517-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-89518-5
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)