Abstract
In Genetic Programming (GP), the fitness of individuals is normally computed by using a set of fitness cases (FCs). Research on the use of FCs in GP has primarily focused on how to reduce the size of these sets. However, often, only a small set of FCs is available and there is no need to reduce it. In this work, we are interested in using the whole FCs set, but rather than adopting the commonly used GP approach of presenting the entire set of FCs to the system from the beginning of the search, referred as static FCs, we allow the GP system to build it by aggregation over time, named as dynamic FCs, with the hope to make the search more amenable. Moreover, there is no study on the use of FCs in Dynamic Optimisation Problems (DOPs). To this end, we also use the Kendall Tau Distance (KTD) approach, which quantifies pairwise dissimilarities among two lists of fitness values. KTD aims to capture the degree of a change in DOPs and we use this to promote structural diversity. Results on eight symbolic regression functions indicate that both approaches are highly beneficial in GP.
Keywords
- Fitness Cases (FCs)
- Dynamic Optimization Problem (DOPs)
- Symbolic Regression Function
- Fitness Value
- Arbitrary Approach
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
E. Galván-López—Research conducted during Galván’s stay at TAU, INRIA and LRI, CNRS & U. Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, France.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
50 independent runs, 2 types of replacement of individuals (arbitrary, Kendall tau distance-based), 3 types of changes, 8 problems.
References
Galván-López, E., Ait ElHara, O.: Using fitness comparison disagreements as a metric for promoting diversity in dynamic optimisation problems. In: IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence. Springer (2016)
Galván-López, E., McDermott, J., O’Neill, M., Brabazon, A.: Defining locality in genetic programming to predict performance. In: IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pp. 1–8 (2010)
Galván-López, E., McDermott, J., O’Neill, M., Brabazon, A.: Towards an understanding of locality in genetic programming. In: Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, GECCO 2010, pp. 901–908. ACM, New York (2010)
Galván-López, E., McDermott, J., O’Neill, M., Brabazon, A.: Defining locality as a problem difficulty measure in genetic programming. Genet. Program. Evolvable Mach. 12(4), 365–401 (2011)
Galván-López, E., Mezura-Montes, E., Ait ElHara, O., Schoenauer, M.: On the use of semantics in multi-objective genetic programming. In: Handl, J., Hart, E., Lewis, P.R., López-Ibáñez, M., Ochoa, G., Paechter, B. (eds.) PPSN 2016. LNCS, vol. 9921, pp. 353–363. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45823-6_33
Galván-López, E., Trujillo, L., McDermott, J., Kattan, A.: Locality in continuous fitness-valued cases and genetic programming difficulty. In: Schütze, O., Coello, C.A.C., Tantar, A., Tantar, E., Bouvry, P., Moral, P.D., Legrand, P. (eds.) EVOLVE 2012. AISC, vol. 175, pp. 41–56. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31519-0_3
Galván-López, E., Vázquez-Mendoza, L., Schoenauer, M., Trujillo, L.: Dynamic GP fitness cases in static and dynamic optimisation problems. In: Bosman, P.A.N. (ed.) Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, Berlin, Germany, 15–19 July 2017, Companion Material Proceedings, pp. 227–228. ACM (2017)
Galván-López, E., Vázquez-Mendoza, L., Trujillo, L.: Stochastic semantic-based multi-objective genetic programming optimisation for classification of imbalanced data. In: Pichardo-Lagunas, O., Miranda-Jiménez, S. (eds.) MICAI 2016. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10062, pp. 261–272. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62428-0_22
Gathercole, C., Ross, P.: Dynamic training subset selection for supervised learning in genetic programming. In: Davidor, Y., Schwefel, H.-P., Männer, R. (eds.) PPSN 1994. LNCS, vol. 866, pp. 312–321. Springer, Heidelberg (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-58484-6_275
Giacobini, M., Tomassini, M., Vanneschi, L.: Limiting the number of fitness cases in genetic programming using statistics. In: Guervós, J.J.M., Adamidis, P., Beyer, H.-G., Schwefel, H.-P., Fernández-Villacañas, J.-L. (eds.) PPSN 2002. LNCS, vol. 2439, pp. 371–380. Springer, Heidelberg (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45712-7_36
Gonçalves, I., Silva, S.: Balancing learning and overfitting in genetic programming with interleaved sampling of training data. In: Krawiec, K., Moraglio, A., Hu, T., Etaner-Uyar, A.Ş., Hu, B. (eds.) EuroGP 2013. LNCS, vol. 7831, pp. 73–84. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37207-0_7
Jones, T., Forrest, S.: Fitness distance correlation as a measure of problem difficulty for genetic algorithms. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, pp. 184–192. Morgan Kaufmann (1995)
Koza, J.R.: Genetic Programming: On the Programming of Computers by Means of Natural Selection. MIT Press, Cambridge (1992)
La Cava, W., Spector, L., Danai, K.: Epsilon-lexicase selection for regression. In: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference 2016, GECCO 2016, pp. 741–748. ACM, New York (2016)
Lasarczyk, C.W.G., Dittrich, P.W.G., Banzhaf, W.W.G.: Dynamic subset selection based on a fitness case topology. Evol. Comput. 12(2), 223–242 (2004)
López, U., Trujillo, L., Martinez, Y., Legrand, P., Naredo, E., Silva, S.: RANSAC-GP: dealing with outliers in symbolic regression with genetic programming. In: McDermott, J., Castelli, M., Sekanina, L., Haasdijk, E., García-Sánchez, P. (eds.) EuroGP 2017. LNCS, vol. 10196, pp. 114–130. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55696-3_8
Macedo, J., Costa, E., Marques, L.: Genetic programming algorithms for dynamic environments. In: Squillero, G., Burelli, P. (eds.) EvoApplications 2016. LNCS, vol. 9598, pp. 280–295. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31153-1_19
Martínez, Y., Naredo, E., Trujillo, L., Legrand, P., López, U.: A comparison of fitness-case sampling methods for genetic programming. J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell. 1–22 (2017)
McDermott, J., et al.: Genetic programming needs better benchmarks. In: Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, GECCO 2012, pp. 791–798. ACM, New York (2012)
Nguyen, T.T., Yang, S., Branke, J.: Evolutionary dynamic optimization: a survey of the state of the art. Swarm Evol. Comput. 6, 1–24 (2012)
Riekert, M., Malan, K.M., Engelbrect, A.P.: Adaptive genetic programming for dynamic classification problems. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference on Congress on Evolutionary Computation, CEC 2009, pp. 674–681. IEEE Press, Piscataway (2009)
Spector, L.: Assessment of problem modality by differential performance of lexicase selection in genetic programming: a preliminary report. In: Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion, GECCO Companion 2012, pp. 401–408. ACM (2012)
Teller, A., Andre, D.: Automatically choosing the number of fitness cases: the rational allocation of trials. In: Koza, J.R., et al. (eds.) Genetic Programming 1997: Proceedings of the Second Annual Conference, Stanford University, CA, USA, 13–16 July 1997, pp. 321–328. Morgan Kaufmann (1997)
Vanneschi, L., Cuccu, G.: A study of genetic programming variable population size for dynamic optimization problems. In: IJCCI, pp. 119–126 (2009)
Wagner, N., Michalewicz, Z., Khouja, M., McGregor, R.R.: Time series forecasting for dynamic environments: the DyFor genetic program model. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 11(4), 433–452 (2007)
Zhang, B.-T., Cho, D.-Y.: Genetic programming with active data selection. In: McKay, B., Yao, X., Newton, C.S., Kim, J.-H., Furuhashi, T. (eds.) SEAL 1998. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1585, pp. 146–153. Springer, Heidelberg (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48873-1_20
Acknowledgments
EGL would like to thank the TAU group at INRIA Saclay for hosting him during the outgoing phase of his Marie Curie fellowship and for financially supporting him to present this work at the conference. LT would like to thank CONACYT (project FC-2015-2:944) for providing partial funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this paper
Cite this paper
Galván-López, E., Vázquez-Mendoza, L., Schoenauer, M., Trujillo, L. (2018). On the Use of Dynamic GP Fitness Cases in Static and Dynamic Optimisation Problems. In: Lutton, E., Legrand, P., Parrend, P., Monmarché, N., Schoenauer, M. (eds) Artificial Evolution. EA 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10764. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78133-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78133-4_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78132-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78133-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)