Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Most Influential Family Business Articles from 2006 to 2013 Using Five Theoretical Perspectives

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Heterogeneity among Family Firms

Abstract

In this chapter, we highlight and review the most frequently cited articles that have influenced family business research between 2006 and 2013 from the five most commonly adopted theoretical perspectives: agency theory, resource-based view, stewardship theory, socioemotional wealth, and institutional theory. Using citation counts from Google Scholar, we identified 21 articles that covered these perspectives. Our review discusses the contributions of these highly cited articles, particularly in terms of understanding family firm heterogeneity. We conclude the chapter by suggesting future research directions using these and other theoretical perspectives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Also see review articles at http://journals.sagepub.com/topic/collections/fbr-1-selected_review_articles/fbr

  2. 2.

    Our original purpose was to review the top five articles per theory; however, we ended with 21 articles because 4 articles used more than one of the theories.

  3. 3.

    American Economic Review, Academy of Management Journal, Academy of Management Review, Administrative Science Quarterly, Business Ethics Quarterly, Corporate Governance: An International Review, California Management Review, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Family Business Review, Harvard Business Review, Human Relations, International Small Business Journal, Journal of Business Ethics, Journal of Business Research, Journal of Business Venturing, Journal of Family Business Management, Journal of Family Business Strategy, Journal of Finance, Journal of Financial Economics, Journal of Management, Journal of Management Studies, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Journal of Small Business Management, Leadership Quarterly, Long Range Planning, Management Science, Organizational Dynamics, Organization Science, Organization Studies, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Small Business Economics, Strategic Management Journal, Sloan Management Review, and Strategic Organization.

  4. 4.

    In order to allow a fair representation of citations per year, the searches for influential articles were limited to family business articles that were published between January 2006 and December 2013. However, articles published after December 2013 were considered for enhancing the review and future research directions.

  5. 5.

    Citation counts were conducted using the Google Scholar’s database on September 4, 2017.

  6. 6.

    This premium disappears if the firm is sold to another family member. The authors explain that this is because when the firm is sold within the family, socioemotional wealth (SEW) is maintained.

  7. 7.

    Articles highlighted in the review are shown in bold.

References

Articles highlighted in the review are shown in bold.

  • Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. M. (2003). Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1301–1328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arregle, J. L., Hitt, M. A., Sirmon, D. G., & Very, P. (2007). The development of organizational social capital: Attributes of family firms. Journal of Management Studies, 44 (1), 73–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berrone, P., Cruz, C., Gomez-Mejia, L. R., & Larraza-Kintana, M. (2010). Socioemotional wealth and corporate responses to institutional pressures: Do family-controlled firms pollute less? Administrative Science Quarterly, 55 (1), 82–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berrone, P., Cruz, C., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25 (3), 258–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carney, M. (2005). Corporate governance and competitive advantage in family-controlled firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(3), 249–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassia, L., De Massis, A., & Pizzurno, E. (2011). An exploratory investigation on NPD in small family businesses from Northern Italy. International Journal of Business, Management and Social Sciences, 2(2), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S., Chen, X., Cheng, Q., & Shevlin, T. (2010). Are family firms more tax aggressive than non-family firms? Journal of Financial Economics, 95 (1), 41–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chrisman, J. J., & Patel, P. C. (2012). Variations in R&D investments of family and nonfamily firms: Behavioral agency and myopic loss aversion perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 55 (4), 976–997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., & Litz, R. A. (2004). Comparing the agency costs of family and nonfamily firms: Conceptual issues and exploratory evidence. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(4), 335–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chrisman, J. J., Kellermanns, F. W., Chan, K. C., & Liano, K. (2010). Intellectual foundations of current research in family business: An identification and review of 25 influential articles. Family Business Review, 23(1), 9–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chrisman, J. J., Memili, E., & Misra, K. (2014). Non-family managers, family firms, and the winner’s curse: The influence of non-economic goals and bounded rationality. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(5), 1103–1127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chua, J. H., Chrisman, J. J., Steier, L. P., & Rau, S. B. (2012). Sources of heterogeneity in family firms: An introduction. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(6), 1103–1113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbetta, G., & Salvato, C. (2004). Self-serving or self-actualizing? Models of man and agency costs in different types of family firms: A commentary on “comparing the agency costs of family and non-family firms: Conceptual issues and exploratory evidence”. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(4), 355–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daspit, J. J., Holt, D. T., Chrisman, J. J., & Long, R. G. (2016). Examining family firm succession from a social exchange perspective: A multiphase, multistakeholder review. Family Business Review, 29(1), 44–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Massis, A., Frattini, F., & Lichtenthaler, U. (2013). Research on technological innovation in family firms: Present debates and future directions. Family Business Review, 26 (1), 10–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Massis, A., Kotlar, J., Chua, J. H., & Chrisman, J. J. (2014). Ability and willingness as sufficiency conditions for family-oriented particularistic behavior: Implications for theory and empirical studies. Journal of Small Business Management, 52(2), 344–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debicki, B. J., Matherne, C. F., Kellermanns, F. W., & Chrisman, J. J. (2009). Family business research in the new millennium: An overview of the who, the where, the what, and the why. Family Business Review, 22(2), 151–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debicki, B., Kellermanns, F., Chrisman, J. J., Pearson, A., & Spencer, B. (2016). Development of a socioemotional wealth importance (SEWi) scale for family firm research. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 7(1), 47–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deephouse, D. L. (1996). Does isomorphism legitimate? Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 1024–1039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz, H. (1988). The theory of the firm revisited. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 4(1), 141–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. (1954). The practice of management. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durand, R., & Vargas, V. (2003). Ownership, organization, and private firms’ efficient use of resources. Strategic Management Journal, 24(7), 667–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, W. G. (2006). Examining the “family effect” on firm performance. Family Business Review, 19 (4), 253–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Economist (2014, November 1). Family companies: Relative success. (2014, November). The Economist, 410(8907), 12–13. Retrieved from https://www.economist.com/leaders/2014/11/01/relative-success.

  • Eddleston, K. A., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2007). Destructive and productive family relationships: A stewardship theory perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 22 (4), 545–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eddleston, K. A., Kellermanns, F. W., & Sarathy, R. (2008). Resource configuration in family firms: Linking resources, strategic planning and technological opportunities to performance. Journal of Management Studies, 45 (1), 26–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evert, R. E., Martin, J. A., McLeod, M. S., & Payne, G. T. (2017). Empirics in family business research: Progress, challenges, and the path ahead. Family Business Review, 29(1), 17–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gedajlovic, E., Carney, M., Chrisman, J. J., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2012). The adolescence of family firm research: Taking stock and planning for the future. Journal of Management, 38 (4), 1010–1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goel, S., & Jones, R. J. (2016). Entrepreneurial exploration and exploitation in family business: A systematic review and future directions. Family Business Review, 29(1), 94–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Mejía, L. R., Haynes, K. T., Núñez-Nickel, M., Jacobson, K. J., & Moyano-Fuentes, J. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52 (1), 106–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Cruz, C., Berrone, P., & De Castro, J. (2011). The bind that ties: Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms. The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 653–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habbershon, T. G., & Williams, M. L. (1999). A resource-based framework for assessing the strategic advantages of family firms. Family Business Review, 12(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauck, J., Suess-Reyes, J., Beck, S., Prügl, R., & Frank, H. (2016). Measuring socioemotional wealth in family-owned and-managed firms: A validation and short form of the FIBER scale. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 7(3), 133–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaskiewicz, P., & Dyer, W. G. (2017). Addressing the elephant in the room: Disentangling family heterogeneity to advance family business research. Family Business Review, 30(2), 111–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaskiewicz, P., Combs, J., Shanine, K., & Kacmar, M. (2017). Introducing the family: A review of family science with implications for management research. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 309–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analayis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellermanns, F. W., & Eddleston, K. A. (2004). Feuding families: When conflict does a family firm good. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(3), 209–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Breton-Miller, I., & Miller, D. (2006). Why do some family businesses out-compete? Governance, long-term orientations, and sustainable capability. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30 (6), 731–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Breton-Miller, I., & Miller, D. (2009). Agency vs. stewardship in public family firms: A social embeddedness reconciliation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33 (6), 1169–1191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leana, C. R., & Van Buren, H. J. (1999). Organizational social capital and employment practices. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 538–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leaptrott, J. (2005). An institutional theory view of the family business. Family Business Review, 18(3), 215–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madison, K., Holt, D., Kellermanns, F. W., & Ranft, A. L. (2016). Viewing family firm behavior and governance through the lens of agency and stewardship theories. Family Business Review, 29(1), 65–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, R. G. (2001). Exploratory learning, innovative capacity, and managerial oversight. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 118–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melin, L., & Nordqvist, M. (2007). The reflexive dynamics of institutionalization: The case of the family business. Strategic Organization, 5(3), 321–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Memili, E., Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., Chang, E. P. C., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2011). The determinants of family firms’ subcontracting: A transaction cost perspective. Journal of Family Business Strategies, 2(1), 26–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., & Le Breton-Miller, I. (2006). Family governance and firm performance: Agency, stewardship, and capabilities. Family Business Review, 19 (1), 73–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I., & Lester, R. H. (2011). Family and lone founder ownership and strategic behaviour: Social context, identity, and institutional logics. Journal of Management Studies, 48 (1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I., & Lester, R. H. (2013). Family firm governance, strategic conformity, and performance: Institutional vs. strategic perspectives. Organization Science, 24 (1), 189–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., Chrisman, J. J., & Spence, L. J. (2011). Toward a theory of stakeholder salience in family firms. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(2), 235–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, A. W., Carr, J. C., & Shaw, J. C. (2008). Toward a theory of familiness: A social capital perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32 (6), 949–969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvato, C., Chirico, F., & Sharma, P. (2010). A farewell to the business: Championing exit and continuity in entrepreneurial family firms. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 22 (3–4), 321–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santiago, A. L. (2000). Succession experiences in Philippine family businesses. Family Business Review, 13(1), 15–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulze, W. S., Lubatkin, M. H., Dino, R. N., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2001). Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organization Science, 12(2), 99–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirmon, D. G., & Hitt, M. A. (2003). Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management, and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(4), 339–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandekerkhof, P., Steijvers, T., Hendriks, W., & Voordeckers, W. (2015). The effect of organizational characteristics on the appointment of nonfamily managers in private family firms: The moderating role of socioemotional wealth. Family Business Review, 28(2), 104–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbeke, A., & Kano, L. (2012). The transaction cost economics theory of the family firm: Family-based human asset specificity and the bifurcation bias. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(6), 1183–1205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villalonga, B., Amit, R., Trujillo, M. A., & Guzmán, A. (2015). Governance of family firms. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 7, 635–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westhead, P., & Howorth, C. (2006). Ownership and management issues associated with family firm performance and company objectives. Family Business Review, 19 (4), 301–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman, R. M., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (1998). A behavioral agency model of managerial risk taking. Academy of Management Review, 23(1), 133–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A., Hayton, J. C., Neubaum, D. O., Dibrell, C., & Craig, J. (2008). Culture of family commitment and strategic flexibility: The moderating effect of stewardship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32 (6), 1035–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zellweger, T., & Kammerlander, N. (2015). Family, wealth, and governance: An agency account. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(6), 1281–1303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zellweger, T. M., Kellermanns, F. W., Chrisman, J. J., & Chua, J. H. (2012). Family control and family firm valuation by family CEOs: The importance of intentions for transgenerational control. Organization Science, 23 (3), 851–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zukin, S., & DiMaggio, P. (Eds.). (1990). Structures of capital: The social organization of the economy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS, USA

    Dustin L. Odom & James J. Chrisman

  2. Arkansas State University, Jonesboro, AR, USA

    Erick P. C. Chang

  3. University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada

    James J. Chrisman & Lloyd Steier

  4. The University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA

    Pramodita Sharma

  5. Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA

    Pramodita Sharma

Authors
  1. Dustin L. Odom
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Erick P. C. Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. James J. Chrisman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Pramodita Sharma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Lloyd Steier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dustin L. Odom .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Bryan School of Business and Economics, University of North Carolina-Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, USA

    Esra Memili

  2. School of Business Administration, The University of Mississippi, University, MS, USA

    Clay Dibrell

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Odom, D.L., Chang, E.P.C., Chrisman, J.J., Sharma, P., Steier, L. (2019). The Most Influential Family Business Articles from 2006 to 2013 Using Five Theoretical Perspectives. In: Memili, E., Dibrell, C. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Heterogeneity among Family Firms. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77676-7_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation