Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Pocket Book for Simulation Debriefing in Healthcare pp 1–33Cite as

Introduction to Debriefing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

  • 1469 Accesses

Abstract

Debriefing is a crucial aspect of simulation-based educational interventions in healthcare. This section of this pocket book aims to clarify what debriefing is really about and why it is such an important aspect of the learning process for everyone involved: participants, simulation observers, and facilitators alike. It also places emphasis on the aspect of briefing as a phase that sets foundation for a successful debriefing so learners understand the approach adopted and what will be expected from them during that phase and its purpose. The many other critical aspects around the practicalities of debriefing, which are “the what, who, when, where, and how to debrief”, are individually explored to provide clear advice with support of relevant references. Of notable importance in this section is the clear description of the most common education performance review approaches (directive feedback, plus/delta, after action review, structured debriefing, etc.) so the most appropriate one can be selected depending on various parameters such as the learning objectives being addressed, the level of expertise of the participants, and the time available.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alinier G (2003) Nursing students’ and lecturers’ perspectives of objective structured clinical examination incorporating simulation. Nurse Educ Today 23(6):419–426. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=12900190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alinier G (2007) A typology of educationally focused medical simulation tools. Med Teach 29(8):e243–e250. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=18236268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alinier G (2011) Developing high-fidelity health care simulation scenarios: a guide for educators and professionals. Simul Gaming 42(1):9–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angelo TA, Cross KP (1993) Classroom assessment techniques: a handbook for college teachers. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Arafeh JM, Hansen SS, Nichols A (2010) Debriefing in simulated-based learning: facilitating a reflective discussion. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 24(4):302–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archer JC (2010) State of the science in health professional education: effective feedback. Med Educ 44(1):101–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blazeck AM, Katrancha E, Drahnak D, Sowko LA, Faett B (2016) Using interactive video-based teaching to improve nursing students’ ability to provide patient-centered discharge teaching. J Nurs Educ 55(5):296–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boese T, Cato M, Gonzalez L, Jones A, Kennedy K, Reese C et al (2013) Standards of best practice: simulation standard V: facilitator. Clin Simul Nurs 9(6):S22–S25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boet S, Bould MD, Bruppacher HR, Desjardins F, Chandra DB, Naik VN (2011) Looking in the mirror: self-debriefing versus instructor debriefing for simulated crises. Crit Care Med 39(6):1377–1381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boet S, Bould MD, Fung L, Qosa H, Perrier L, Tavares W et al (2014) Transfer of learning and patient outcome in simulated crisis resource management: a systematic review. Can J Anesth 61(6):571–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinko KT (1993) The practice of giving feedback to improve teaching: what is effective? J High Educ 64(5):574–593

    Google Scholar 

  • Burbach B, Barnason S, Thompson SA (2015) Using “think aloud” to capture clinical reasoning during patient simulation. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh 12(1):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantillon P, Sargeant J (2008) Giving feedback in clinical settings. BMJ 337(nov10_2):a1961–a1961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayon P (2011) Handbook of human factors and ergonomics in health care and patient safety. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Chabris C (2017) The invisible Gorilla, and other critical everyday cognitive limitations. Paper presented at the International Pediatric Simulation Symposia and Workshop (IPSSW), 1–3 June 2017, Boston, MA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng A, Rodgers D, van der Jagt É, Eppich W, O’Donnell J (2012) Evolution of the pediatric advanced life support course: enhanced learning with a new debriefing tool and web-based module for pediatric advanced life support instructors*. Pediatr Crit Care Med 13(5):589–595. doi:10.1097/PCC.0b013e3182417709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng A, Eppich W, Grant V, Sherbino J, Zendejas B, Cook DA (2014) Debriefing for technology-enhanced simulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Educ 48:657–666. doi:10.1111/medu.12432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng A, Grant V, Dieckmann P, Arora S, Robinson T, Eppich W (2015a) Faculty development for simulation programs: five issues for the future of debriefing training. Simul Healthc 10(4):217–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng A, Palaganas JC, Eppich W, Rudolph J, Robinson T, Grant V (2015b) Co-debriefing for simulation-based education: a primer for facilitators. Simul Healthc 10(2):69–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng A, Grant V, Robinson T, Catena H, Lachapelle K, Kim J et al (2016a) The Promoting Excellence and Reflective Learning in Simulation (PEARLS) approach to health care debriefing: a faculty development guide. Clin Simul Nurs 12(10):419–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng A, Morse K, Rudolph J, Arab AA, Runnacles J, Eppich W (2016b) Learner-centered debriefing for health care simulation education: lessons for faculty development. Simul Healthc 11(1):32–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho SJ (2015) Debriefing in pediatrics. Korean J Pediatr 58(2):47–51. doi:10.3345/kjp.2015.58.2.47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi H-H, Van Merriënboer JJ, Paas F (2014) Effects of the physical environment on cognitive load and learning: towards a new model of cognitive load. Educ Psychol Rev 26(2):225–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark RC, Nguyen F, Sweller J (2011) Efficiency in learning: evidence-based guidelines to manage cognitive load. Wiley, San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis DA, Mazmanian PE, Fordis M, Van Harrison R, Thorpe KE, Perrier L (2006) Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: a systematic review. JAMA 296(9):1094–1102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decker S, Fey M, Sideras S, Caballero S, Boese T, Franklin AE et al (2013) Standards of best practice: simulation standard VI: the debriefing process. Clin Simul Nurs 9(6):S26–S29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Der Sahakian G, Alinier G, Savoldelli G, Oriot D, Jaffrelot M, Lecomte F (2015) Setting conditions for productive debriefing. Simul Gaming 46(2):197–208. doi:10.1177/1046878115576105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeVita MA, Schaefer J, Lutz J, Wang H, Dongilli T (2005) Improving medical emergency team (MET) performance using a novel curriculum and a computerized human patient simulator. Qual Saf Health Care 14(5):326–331. doi:10.1136/qshc.2004.011148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dieckmann P, Gaba D, Rall M (2007) Deepening the theoretical foundations of patient simulation as social practice. Simul Healthc 2(3):183–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dieckmann P, Molin Friis S, Lippert A, Østergaard D (2009) The art and science of debriefing in simulation: ideal and practice. Med Teach 31(7):e287–e294. doi:10.1080/01421590902866218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dine CJ, Gersh RE, Leary M, Riegel BJ, Bellini LM, Abella BS (2008) Improving cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality and resuscitation training by combining audiovisual feedback and debriefing*. Crit Care Med 36(10):2817–2822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dismukes RK, Gaba DM, Howard SK (2006) So many roads: facilitated debriefing in healthcare. Simul Healthc 1(1):23–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donoghue A, Ventre K, Boulet J, Brett-Fleegler M, Nishisaki A, Overly F et al (2011) Design, implementation, and psychometric analysis of a scoring instrument for simulated pediatric resuscitation: a report from the EXPRESS pediatric investigators. Simul Healthc 6(2):71–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreifuerst KT (2010) Debriefing for meaningful learning: fostering development of clinical reasoning through simulation. Faculty of the University Graduate School in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Nursing, Indiana University

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreifuerst KT (2015) Getting started with debriefing for meaningful learning. Clin Simul Nurs 11(5):268–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eppich W, Cheng A (2015) Promoting Excellence and Reflective Learning in Simulation (PEARLS): development and rationale for a blended approach to health care simulation debriefing. Simul Healthc 10(2):106–115. doi:10.1097/sih.0000000000000072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eppich W, Hunt E, Duval-Arnould J, Siddall V, Cheng A (2015) Structuring feedback and debriefing to achieve mastery learning goals. Acad Med 90(11):1501–1508. doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000000934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falcone RA, Daugherty M, Schweer L, Patterson M, Brown RL, Garcia VF (2008) Multidisciplinary pediatric trauma team training using high-fidelity trauma simulation. J Pediatr Surg 43(6):1065–1071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fanning RM, Gaba DM (2007) The role of debriefing in simulation-based learning. Simul Healthc 2(2):115–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaba D, Howard SK, Fish KJ, Smith BE, Sowb Y (2001) Simulation-based training in Anesthesia Crisis Resource Management (ACRM): a decade of experience. Simul Gaming 32(2):175–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner R (2013) Introduction to debriefing. Semin Perinatol 37:166–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatala R, Cook DA, Zendejas B, Hamstra SJ, Brydges R (2014) Feedback for simulation-based procedural skills training: a meta-analysis and critical narrative synthesis. Adv Health Sci Educ 19(2):251–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helmreich RL, Davies JM (1996) 3 Human factors in the operating room: interpersonal determinants of safety, efficiency and morale. Baillière’s Clin Anaesthesiol 10(2):277–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helmreich RL, Wilhelm JA (1991) Outcomes of crew resource management training. Int J Aviat Psychol 1(4):287–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks CM, Kiss A, Bandiera GW, Denny CJ (2012) Crisis Resources for Emergency Workers (CREW II): results of a pilot study and simulation-based crisis resource management course for emergency medicine residents. CJEM 14(06):354–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard SK, Gaba DM, Fish KJ, Yang G, Sarnquist FH (1992) Anesthesia crisis resource management training: teaching anesthesiologists to handle critical incidents. Aviat Space Environ Med 63(9):763–770. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=1524531

    Google Scholar 

  • ICISF (2017) International critical incident stress foundation. Retrieved from https://www.icisf.org/. Accessed 22 Jun 2017

  • Isaranuwatchai W, Alam F, Hoch J, Boet S (2016) A cost-effectiveness analysis of self-debriefing versus instructor debriefing for simulated crises in perioperative medicine in Canada. J Educ Eval Health Prof 13:44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaye P, Thomas L, Reedy G (2015) ‘The Diamond’: a structure for simulation debrief. Clin Teach 12(3):171–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffries PR, Rizzolo MA (2006, 01/01/2012). Designing and implementing models for the innovative use of simulation in teaching nursing care of ill adults and children; A national, multi-site, multi-method study. Retrieved from National League for Nursing report. http://sirc.nln.org/pluginfile.php/165/mod_page/content/8/NLN%20Laerdal%20Research%20Project%202003.pdf. Accessed 22 Jun 2017

  • Jones I, Alinier G (2015) Supporting students’ learning experiences through a pocket size cue card designed around a reflective simulation framework. Clin Simul Nurs 11(7):325–334. doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2015.04.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlsen R (2013) Stable Program. Adaptation of the RUS model. Original work from the Center for Medical Simulation (D.R.), Cambridge, MA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ker J, Bradley P (2014) Simulation in medical education. In: Swanwick T (ed) Understanding medical education: evidence, theory and practice, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Klair M (2000) The mediated debrief of problem flights. In: Dismukes K, Smith G (eds) Facilitation and debriefing in aviation training and operations. Ashgate, Aldershot, p 72, 92

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolbe M, Weiss M, Grote G, Knauth A, Dambach M, Spahn DR (2013) TeamGAINS: a tool for structured debriefings for simulation-based team trainings. BMJ Qual Saf 22:541–553. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2012-000917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolbe M, Grande B, Spahn DR (2015) Briefing and debriefing during simulation-based training and beyond: content, structure, attitude, and setting. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 29:87–96. doi:10.1016/j.bpa.2015.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kowalewski K-F, Hendrie JD, Schmidt MW, Garrow CR, Bruckner T, Proctor T et al (2017) Development and validation of a sensor-and expert model-based training system for laparoscopic surgery: the iSurgeon. Surg Endosc 31(5):2155–2165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kriz WC (2008) A systemic-constructivist approach to the facilitation and debriefing of simulations and games. Simul Gaming 41(5):663–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurtz S, Silverman J, Draper J (2016) Teaching and learning communication skills in medicine. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambton J, Prion S (2009) The value of simulation in the development of observational skills for clinical microsystems. Clin Simul Nurs 5(4):e137–e143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefroy J, Watling C, Teunissen PW, Brand P (2015) Guidelines: the do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. Perspect Med Educ 4(6):284–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leigh GT (2008) High-fidelity patient simulation and nursing students’ self-efficacy: a review of the literature. Int J Nurs Educ Sch 5. Retrieved from http://nhs4223612.resolver.library.nhs.uk/linker?template=slinks:redirect&issn=1548-923X&title=International+Journal+of+Nursing+Education+Scholarship&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Felsevier.com%3AScienceDirect&provider=EBSCOhost&pkgName=c8h&jHome=http%3A%2F%2Fsearch.ebscohost.com%2Fdirect.asp%3Fdb%3Dc8h%26jid%3DYRZ%26scope%3Dsite

  • Levett-Jones T, Lapkin S (2014) A systematic review of the effectiveness of simulation debriefing in health professional education. Nurse Educ Today 34(6):e58–e63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lioce L, Meakim CH, Fey MK, Chmil JV, Mariani B, Alinier G (2015) Standards of best practice: simulation standard IX: simulation design. Clin Simul Nurs 11(6):309–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopreiato J (2016) Healthcare simulation dictionary. Rockville, MD, USA: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality AHRQ Publication No. 16(17)-0043

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayville ML (2011) Debriefing: the essential step in simulation. Newborn Infant Nurs Rev 11(1):35–39. doi:10.1053/j.nainr.2010.12.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meakim C, Boese T, Decker S, Franklin AE, Gloe D, Lioce L et al (2013) Standards of best practice: simulation standard I: terminology. Clin Simul Nurs 6(9):S3–S11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller GA (1956) The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol Rev 63(2):81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell J, Everly G (1993) Critical incident stress debriefing: an operations manual for the prevention of trauma among emergency service and disaster workers. Chevron, Baltimore, MD

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell AM, Sakraida TJ, Kameg K (2003) Critical incident stress debriefing: implications for best practice. Disaster Manag Response 1(2):46–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monash University (2015) Debriefing learners in simulation. Teaching Resource for Rural Clinical Educators—North West Rural Medical Education Unit, September 2015(30):1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan P, Tarshis J, LeBlanc V, Cleave-Hogg D, DeSousa S, Haley M et al (2009) Efficacy of high-fidelity simulation debriefing on the performance of practicing anaesthetists in simulated scenarios. Br J Anaesth 103(4):531–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mort TC, Donahue SP (2004) Debriefing: the basics. In: Dunn WF (ed) Simulators in critical care and beyond. Society for Critical Care Medicine, Des Plaines, IL, pp 76–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Motola I, Devine LA, Chung HS, Sullivan JE, Issenberg SB (2013) Simulation in healthcare education: a best evidence practical guide. AMEE Guide No. 82. Med Teach 35(10):e1511–e1530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neill MA, Wotton K (2011) High-fidelity simulation debriefing in nursing education: a literature review. Clin Simul Nurs 7(5):e161–e168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien C, Leeman K, Roussin C, Casey D, Grandinetti T, Lindamood K (2017) Using plus-delta-plus human factors debriefing to bridge simulation and clinical environments. Paper presented at the International Pediatric Simulation Symposia and Workshop (IPSSW), 1–3 June 2017, Boston, MA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell J, Rodgers D, Lee W, Edelson D, Haag J, Hamilton M et al (2009) Structured and supported debriefing. American Heart Association, Dallas, TX

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen H, Follows V (2006) GREAT simulation debriefing. Med Educ 40(5):488–489. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02421.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page-Cutrara K (2014) Use of prebriefing in nursing simulation: a literature review. J Nurs Edu 53(3):136–141. doi:10.3928/01484834-20140211-07

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkes J, Abercrombie S, McCarty T (2013) Feedback sandwiches affect perceptions but not performance. Adv Health Sci Educ 18(3):397–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pendleton D, Schofield T, Tate P, Havelock P (2003) The new consultation: developing doctor-patient communication. OUP, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins GD (2007) Simulation in resuscitation training. Resuscitation 73(2):202–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phrampus P, O’Donnell J (2013) Debriefing using a structured and supported approach. In: Levine AI, DeMaria S, Schwartz AD, Jim AJ (eds) The comprehensive textbook of healthcare simulation. Springer, New York, NY, pp 73–84

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Raemer D, Anderson M, Cheng A, Fanning R, Nadkarni V, Savoldelli G (2011) Research regarding debriefing as part of the learning process. Simul Healthc 6(Suppl):S52–S57. doi:10.1097/SIH.0b013e31822724d0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rall M, Glavin R, Flin R (2008) The ‘10-seconds-for-10-minutes principle’-Why things go wrong and stopping them getting worse. Bull R Coll Anaesth 51:2614–2616

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothgeb MK (2008) Creating a nursing simulation laboratory: A literature review. Journal of Nursing Education, 47(11):489–494

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudolph J, Simon R, Dufresne R, Raemer D (2006) There’s no such thing as “nonjudgmental” debriefing: a theory and method for debriefing with good judgment. Simul Healthc 1(1):49–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudolph J, Simon R, Rivard P, Dufresne R, Raemer D (2007) Debriefing with good judgment: combining rigorous feedback with genuine inquiry. Anesthesiol Clin 25(2):361–376. doi:10.1016/j.anclin.2007.03.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudolph J, Simon F, Raemer D, Eppich W (2008) Debriefing as formative assessment: closing performance gaps in medical education. Acad Emerg Med 15:1010–1016. doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00248.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudolph J, Raemer D, Simon R (2014) Establishing a safe container for learning in simulation: the role of the presimulation briefing. Simul Healthc 9(6):339–349. doi:10.1097/sih.0000000000000047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savoldelli GL, Naik VN, Park J, Joo HS, Chow R, Hamstra SJ (2006) Value of debriefing during simulated crisis management oral versus video-assisted oral feedback. J Am Soc Anesthesiol 105(2):279–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer TL, Deering S (2013) Adaptation of the US Army’s after-action review for simulation debriefing in healthcare. Simul Healthc 8(6):388–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer T, Brett-Fleegler M, Eppich WJ (2016a) Essentials of debriefing and feedback. In: Grant V, Cheng A (eds) Comprehensive healthcare simulation: pediatrics. Springer, New York, pp 31–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer T, Eppich W, Brett-Fleegler M, Grant V, Cheng A (2016b) More than one way to debrief: a critical review of healthcare simulation debriefing methods. Simul Healthc 11:209–217. doi:10.1097/sih.0000000000000148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sigalet E (2017) The LEARN Framework. Memorial University—Faculty of Medicine. Retrieved from http://www.med.mun.ca/TSRC/Cureus/LEARN.aspx. Accessed 08 Jun 2017

  • St. Pierre M, Hofinger G, Buerschaper C, Simon R (2011) The human factors: errors and skills. In: Crisis management in acute care settings: human factors, team psychology, and patient safety in a high stakes environment. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 3–22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stafford F (2005) The significance of de-roling and debriefing in training medical students using simulation to train medical students. Med Educ 39:1083–1085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Telio S, Ajjawi R, Regehr G (2015) The “educational alliance” as a framework for reconceptualizing feedback in medical education. Acad Med 90(5):609–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson RA (2004) Crisis intervention and crisis management: strategies that work in schools and communities. Routledge, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang EE, Kharasch M, Kuruna D (2011) Facilitative debriefing techniques for simulation-based learning. Acad Emerg Med 18(2):e5. doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.01001.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Waxman K (2010) The development of evidence-based clinical simulation scenarios: guidelines for nurse educators. J Nurs Educ 49(1):29–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wayne DB, Didwania A, Feinglass J, Fudala MJ, Barsuk JH, McGaghie WC (2008) Simulation-based education improves quality of care during cardiac arrest team responses at an academic teaching hospital: a case-control study. Chest J 133(1):56–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstock, P. (2013). Boston children’s hospital simulator program, simulation instructor workshop. Harvard University, Boston. Personal communication. March 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Youtube (2017). Don’t judge too quickly (The best 1). Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=asLx-fwQyUU. Accessed 20 Jun 2017

  • Zigmont JJ, Kappus LJ, Sudikoff SN (2011) The 3D model of debriefing: defusing, discovering, and deepening. Semin Perinatol 32:52–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Medicine, ABS-Lab, Simulation Laboratory, University of Poitiers, Poitiers, France

    Denis Oriot

  2. School of Health and Social Work, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK

    Guillaume Alinier

  3. Hamad Medical Corporation Ambulance Service, University of Hertfordshire, Doha, Qatar

    Guillaume Alinier

  4. Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

    Guillaume Alinier

Authors
  1. Denis Oriot
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Guillaume Alinier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Oriot, D., Alinier, G. (2018). Introduction to Debriefing. In: Pocket Book for Simulation Debriefing in Healthcare. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59882-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59882-6_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-59881-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-59882-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation