Skip to main content

Confidence, Humility, and Hubris in Victorian Scientific Naturalism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Epistemic Virtues in the Sciences and the Humanities

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science ((BSPS,volume 321))

Abstract

Most historians explain changes in conceptions of the epistemic virtues and vices in terms of social and historical developments. I argue that such approaches, valuable as they are, neglect the fact that certain changes also reflect changes in metaphysical sensibilities. Certain epistemic virtues and vices are defined relative to an estimate of our epistemic situation that is, in turn, defined by a broader vision or picture of the nature of reality. I defend this claim by charting changing conceptions of the virtue of epistemic humility in nineteenth century intellectual culture, focusing on claims about the humility or hubris of the Victorian scientific naturalists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barton, Ruth. 1998. “Huxley, Lubbock, and half a dozen others”: Professionals and gentlemen in the formation of the X Club, 1851–1864. Isis 89: 410–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumenberg, Hans. 1983. The legitimacy of the modern age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, William Kingdon. 1879. Lectures and essays, vol. 1, ed. Leslie Stephen and Frederick Pollard. London: Macmillan and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comte, Auguste. 1988. Introduction to positive philosophy, ed. and trans. Frederick Ferré. Indianapolis: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, David E. 2002. The measure of things: Humanism, humility, and mystery. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Superstition, science, and life. In Wittgenstein and scientism, ed. Jonathan Beale and Ian James Kidd, 28–38. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corneanu, Sorana. 2011. Regimens of the mind: Boyle, Locke, and the early modern cultura animi tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Craig, Edward. 1987. The mind of God and the works of man. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daston, Lorraine, and Peter Galison. 2007. Objectivity. New York: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, Peter. 2007. The fall of man and the foundations of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Huxley, Thomas Henry. 1872. Lay sermons, addresses, and reviews. New York: D. Applegate and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1893. Essays. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1894. Methods and results: Essays. London: Macmillan and Co..

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1913. Life and letters of Thomas Henry Huxley, vol. 1, ed. Leonard Huxley. London: Macmillan and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1971. T.H. Huxley on education: A selection from his writings, ed. Cyril Bibby. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidd, Ian James. 2015. Educating for intellectual humility. In Intellectual virtues and education: Essays in applied virtue epistemology, ed. Jason Baehr, 54–70. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016a. Intellectual humility, confidence, and argumentation. Topoi 35: 395–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016b. Inevitability, contingency, and epistemic humility. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 55: 12–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Reawakening to wonder: Wittgenstein, Feyerabend, and scientism. In Wittgenstein and scientism, ed. Jonathan Beale and Ian James Kidd, 101–115. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, George. 2014. Paradox: The art of scientific naturalism. In Victorian scientific naturalism: Community, identity, continuity, ed. Bernard Lightman and Gowan Dawson, 79–100. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, Genevieve. 2000. Feminism in history of philosophy: Appropriating the past. In The Cambridge companion to feminism in philosophy, ed. Miranda Fricker and Jennifer Hornsby, 245–263. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Macleod, Roy. 1982. The ‘bankruptcy of science’ debate: The creed of science and its critics, 1885–1900. Science, Technology, and Human Values 7 (4): 2–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, Robert. 1957. Priorities in scientific discovery: A chapter in the sociology of science. American Sociological Review 22: 635–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montaigne, Michel de. 1991. Essays, ed. and trans. M.A. Screech. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, Richard. 2008. Science and scientism in nineteenth-century Europe. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pardue, Stephen T. 2013. The mind of Christ: Humility and the intellect in early Christian theology. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, Harry W. 1968. The debate over the bankruptcy of science in 1895. French Historical Studies 5: 299–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1974. Collected papers, 2 vols., ed. Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1986. Writings of C.S. Peirce: A chronological edition, vol. 3. 18721878. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1992. The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings: vol. 1, 1867–1893, e. Nathan Houser and Christian Kloesel. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1998. The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings, vol. 2, 1893–1913, ed. Peirce Edition Project. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Robert C., and W. Jay Wood. 2007. Intellectual virtues: An essay in regulative epistemology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shapin, Steven. 2008. The scientific life: A moral history of a late modern vocation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, Herbert. 1867. First principles. London: Williams and Norgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, Matthew. 2014. Huxley’s church and Maxwell’s demon: From theistic science to naturalistic science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tyndall, John. 1867. On the study of physics. In The culture demanded by modern life: A series of addresses and arguments on the claims of scientific education, ed. Anon. New York: D. Appleton and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1874. Address delivered before the British Association Assembled at Belfast. London: Green and Co..

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1897. Fragments of science: A series of detached essays, addresses, and reviews. Vol. 1. New York: D. Appleton and Company.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1967. On certainty, ed. G.E.M. Anscombe and G.H. von Wright. Trans. Dennis Paul and G.E.M. Anscombe. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zagzebski, Linda. 1996. Virtues of the Mind: An Inquiry into the Nature of Knowledge and the Ethical Foundations of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to Chiara Ambrosio, David E. Cooper, colleagues at Durham, the editors, and the participants at the conference from which this volume emerged for helpful comments, encouragement, and discussion.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ian James Kidd .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kidd, I.J. (2017). Confidence, Humility, and Hubris in Victorian Scientific Naturalism. In: van Dongen, J., Paul, H. (eds) Epistemic Virtues in the Sciences and the Humanities. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol 321. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48893-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48893-6_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-48892-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-48893-6

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics