Skip to main content

Multiple Chemical Sensitivity

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 190 Accesses

Abstract

Multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS) is an enigmatic term, and although this combination of symptoms has been written about for over 50 years, it is unclear whether this is a disease (a pathophysiological process with a molecular mechanism) or an illness (a subjective feeling of malaise). The Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) does not recognize MCS as a disease (Spencer and Schur 2008). As implied by its name, MCS is a condition in which chemical effects are blamed for causing the subjectively experienced symptoms/complaints. The allergologist Theron Randolph was a major influence in the formation of a movement in the 1950s which called itself clinical ecologists and described for the first time the combination of symptoms which later came to be known as MCS. As he assumed the presence of an allergic pathogenic mechanism, he called this illness the “All Allergy Syndrome.” The idea of an underlying allergic pathogenic mechanism leads the affected persons repeatedly to allergologists, usually after dozens of specialists have already been consulted. Regardless of the diagnostic significance, a patch test using chemical substances is frequently requested. The fact that a positive patch test can only explain an allergic skin reaction and is of no use in explaining other diverse symptoms is often tenaciously ignored by these patients. In addition, these patients also demand specialized allergological procedures such as the lymphocyte transformation test, the histamine release test, or the mast cell degranulation test. The term sensitization has a double meaning in connection with the genesis of MCS. In allergology, sensitization means the immunological processes that are necessary for the immune system to react to an exogenous substance with an allergic reaction. In psychology the term sensitization is used when mental processes recur on repeated exposure after an initial incident. Allergologists and dermatologists are repeatedly confronted by both this conceptualization (sensitization, All Allergy Syndrome) and the wish for clarification by the MCS patients and their ideas about the genesis of MCS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Anon (1999) Multiple chemical sensitivity: a 1999 consensus. Arch Environ Health 54:147–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg ND, Berg Rasmussen H, Linneberg A, Brasch-Andersen C, Fenger M, Dirksen A, Vesterhauge S, Werge T, Elberling J (2010) Genetic susceptibility factors for multiple chemical sensitivity revisited. Int J Hyg Environ Health 213:131–139

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Caress SM, Steinemann AC (2003) A review of two-phase population study of multiple chemical sensitivities. Environ Health Perspect 111:1490–1497

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Caress SM, Steinemann AC (2004) A national population study of the prevalence of multiple chemical sensitivities. Arch Environ Health 59:300–305

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • CDC (2009) “Indoor Environmental Quality Policy”, quoted from: martini a, Iavicoli S, Corso L (2013): multiple chemical sensitivity and the workplace: current position and need for an occupational health surveillance protocol. Oxidative Med Cell Longev 2013:351457

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen MR (1987) The worker with multiple chemical hypersensitivities: an overview. Occup Med 2:655–661

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dantoft TM, Andersson L, Nordin S, Skovbjerg S (2015) Chemical Intolerance. Curr Rheumatol Rev 11(2):167–184

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Das-Munshi J, Rubin GJ, Wessely S (2006) Multiple chemical sensitivities: a systematic review of provocation studies. J Allergy Clin Immunol 118:1257–1264

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graveling RA, Pilkington A, George JPK, Butler MP, Tannahill SN (1999) A review of multiple chemical sensitivity. Occup Environ Med 56:73–85

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Guglielmi RS, Cox DJ, Spyker DA (1994) Behavioral treatment of phobic avoidance in multiple chemical sensitivity. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 25(3):197–209

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hauge CR, Rasmussen A, Piet J, Bonde JP, Jensen C, Sumbundu A, Skovbjerg S (2015) Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) for multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS): results from a randomized controlled trial with 1 year follow-up. J Psychosom Res 79(6):628–634

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson D, Colman I (2017) The association between multiple chemical sensitivity and mental illness: evidence from a nationally representative sample of Canadians. J Psychosom Res 99:40–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loria-Kohen V, Marcos-Pasero H, de la Iglesia R, Aguilar-Aguilar E, Espinosa-Salinas I, Herranz J, Ramirez de Molina A, Reglero G (2017) Multiple chemical sensitivity: genotypic characterization, nutritional status and quality of life in 52 patients. Med Clin (Barc) 149(4):141–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meulders A, Fannes S, van Diest I et al (2010) Resistance to extinction in an odor −20%CO 2 inhalation paradigm: further evidence for a symptom learning account of multiple chemical sensitivity. J Psychosom Res 68:47–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller CS (1997) Toxicant-induced loss of tolerance_an emerging therory of disease? Environ Health Perspect 105(2):445–453

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Miller CS, Prihoda TJ (1999) The environmental exposure and sensitivity inventory (EESI): a standardized approach for measuring chemical intolerances for research and clinical applications. Toxicol Ind Health 15:370–385

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pall ML (2001) Common etiology of posttraumatic stress disorder, fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue syndrome and multiple chemical sensitivity via elevated nitric oxide/peroxynitrite. Med Hypotheses 57(2):139–145

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pall ML (2003) Elevated nitric oxide/Peroxynitrite theory of multiple chemical sensitivity: central role of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors in the sensitivity mechanism. Environ Health Perspect 111(12):1461–1464

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks PJ, Daniell W, Black DW, Kipen HM, Altmann LC, Simon GE, Terr AI (1994) Multiple chemical sensitivity syndrome: a clinical perspective. II. Evaluation, diagnostic testing, treatment, and social considerations. J Occup Med 36(7):731–737

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer TR, Schur PM (2008) The challenge of multiple chemical sensitivity. J Environ Health 70:24–27

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wiesmüller GA, Hornberg C (2017) Environmental medical syndromes. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 60(6):597–604

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wiesner G, Gil FP, Nowak D (2005) Multiple Chemikalienüberempfindlichkeit (MCS) – eine Fallserie. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 130:329–332 (Multiple Chemical Sensitivity (MCS) A series of case histories; German Weekly Medical Magazine 130:329–332)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hans Drexler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Drexler, H., Greiner, A. (2018). Multiple Chemical Sensitivity. In: John, S., Johansen, J., Rustemeyer, T., Elsner, P., Maibach, H. (eds) Kanerva’s Occupational Dermatology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40221-5_203-2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40221-5_203-2

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-40221-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-40221-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics