This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Becker S, Chavanne A, Spitaler R, Kropik K, Aigner N, Ogon M et al (2008) Assessment of different screw augmentation techniques and screw designs in osteoporotic spines. Eur Spine J 17:1462–1469
Chang MC, Liu CL, Chen TH (2008) Polymethylmethacrylate augmentation of pedicle screw for osteoporotic spinal surgery: a novel technique. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:E317–24
Duffy MF, Phillips JH, Knapp DR, Herrera-Soto JA (2010) Usefulness of electromyography compared to computed tomography scans in pedicle screw placement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:E43–8
Fransen P (2007) Increasing pedicle screw anchoring in the osteoporotic spine by cement injection through the implant. Technical note and report of three cases. J Neurosurg Spine 7:366–369
Fraser J, Gebhard H, Irie D, Parikh K, Härtl R (2010) Iso-C/3-dimensional neuronavigation versus conventional fluoroscopy for minimally invasive pedicle screw placement in lumbar fusion. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 53:184–190
Glassman SD, Dimar JR, Puno RM, Johnson JR, Shields CB, Linden RD (1995) A prospective analysis of intraoperative electromyographic monitoring of pedicle screw placement with computed tomographic scan confirmation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20:1375–1379
Hu MH, Wu HT, Chang MC, Yu WK, Wang ST, Liu CL (2011) Polymethylmethacrylate augmentation of the pedicle screw: the cement distribution in the vertebral body. Eur Spine J 20:1281–1288
Isley MR, Zhang XF, Balzer JR, Leppanen RE (2012) Current trends in pedicle screw stimulation techniques: lumbosacral, thoracic, and cervical levels. Neurodiagn J 52:100–175
Joglekar SB, Mehbod AA (2012) Surgeon’s view of pedicle screw implantation for the monitoring neurophysiologist. J Clin Neurophysiol 29:482–488
Kim MC, Chung HT, Cho JL, Kim DJ, Chung NS (2011) Factors affecting the accurate placement of percutaneous pedicle screws during minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J 20:1635–1643
Lehmann W, Ushmaev A, Ruecker A, Nuechtern J, Grossterlinden L, Begemann PG et al (2008) Comparison of open versus percutaneous pedicle screw insertion in a sheep model. Eur Spine J 17:857–863
Lubansu A, Rynkowski M, Abeloos L, Appelboom G, Dewitte O (2012) Minimally invasive spinal arthrodesis in osteoporotic population using a cannulated and fenestrated augmented screw: technical description and clinical experience. Minim Invasive Surg. doi:10.1155/2012/507826
Magerl F, Aebi M, Gertzbein SD et al (1994) A comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries. Eur Spine J 3:184–201
Mobbs RJ, Sivabalan P, Li J (2011) Technique, challenges and indications for percutaneous pedicle screw fixation. J Clin Neurosci 18:741–749
Nakashima H, Sato K, Ando T, Inoh H, Nakamura H (2009) Comparison of the percutaneous screw placement precision of isocentric C-arm 3-dimensional fluoroscopy-navigated pedicle screw implantation and conventional fluoroscopy method with minimally invasive surgery. J Spinal Disord Tech 22:468–472
Oppenheimer JH, DeCastro I, McDonnell DE (2009) Minimally invasive spine technology and minimally invasive spine surgery: a historical review. Neurosurg Focus 27, E9
Payer M (2011) “Minimally invasive” lumbar spine surgery: a critical review. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 153:1455–1459
Samartzis D, Shen FH, Perez-Cruet MJ, Anderson DG (2007) Minimally invasive spine surgery: a historical perspective. Orthop Clin North Am 38:305–326
Schizas C, Michel J, Kosmopoulos V, Theumann N (2007) Computer tomography assessment of pedicle screw insertion in percutaneous posterior transpedicular stabilization. Eur Spine J 16:613–617
Shin BJ, James AR, Njoku IU, Härtl R (2012) Pedicle screw navigation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of perforation risk for computer-navigated versus freehand insertion. J Neurosurg Spine 17:113–122
Smith ZA, Sugimoto K, Lawton CD, Fessler RG (2014) Incidence of lumbar spine pedicle breach after percutaneous screw fixation: a radiographic evaluation of 601 screws in 151 patients. J Spinal Disord Tech. 27(7):358–63. doi:10.1097/BSD.0b013e31826226cb. PubMed PMID:22688617.
Villavicencio AT, Burneikiene S, Bulsara KR, Thramann JJ (2006) Perioperative complications in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus anterior-posterior reconstruction for lumbar disc degeneration and instability. J Spinal Disord Tech 19:92–97
Wu RH, Fraser JF, Hartl R (2010) Minimal access versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: meta-analysis of fusion rates. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:2273–2281
Zdichavsky M, Blauth M, Knop C, Graessner M, Herrmann H, Krettek C, Bastian L (2004) Accuracy of pedicle screw placement in thoracic spine fractures. Part I: inter- and intra-observer reliability of the scoring system. Eur J Trauma 30:234–240
Zdichavsky M, Blauth M, Knop C, Lotz J, Krettek C, Bastian L (2004) Accuracy of pedicle screw placement in thoracic spine fractures. Part II: a retrospective analysis of 278 pedicle screws using computed tomographic scans. Eur J Trauma 30:241–247
Conflict of Interest Statement
The Authors report no declarations of interest. No funds were received in support of this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Iacopino, D.G. et al. (2017). EMG-Guided Percutaneous Placement of Cement-Augmented Pedicle Screws for Osteoporotic Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures. In: Visocchi, M., Mehdorn, H.M., Katayama, Y., von Wild, K.R.H. (eds) Trends in Reconstructive Neurosurgery. Acta Neurochirurgica Supplement, vol 124. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39546-3_47
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39546-3_47
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-39545-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-39546-3
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)