Skip to main content

EMG-Guided Percutaneous Placement of Cement-Augmented Pedicle Screws for Osteoporotic Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Acta Neurochirurgica Supplement ((NEUROCHIRURGICA,volume 124))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Becker S, Chavanne A, Spitaler R, Kropik K, Aigner N, Ogon M et al (2008) Assessment of different screw augmentation techniques and screw designs in osteoporotic spines. Eur Spine J 17:1462–1469

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Chang MC, Liu CL, Chen TH (2008) Polymethylmethacrylate augmentation of pedicle screw for osteoporotic spinal surgery: a novel technique. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:E317–24

    Google Scholar 

  3. Duffy MF, Phillips JH, Knapp DR, Herrera-Soto JA (2010) Usefulness of electromyography compared to computed tomography scans in pedicle screw placement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:E43–8

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fransen P (2007) Increasing pedicle screw anchoring in the osteoporotic spine by cement injection through the implant. Technical note and report of three cases. J Neurosurg Spine 7:366–369

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fraser J, Gebhard H, Irie D, Parikh K, Härtl R (2010) Iso-C/3-dimensional neuronavigation versus conventional fluoroscopy for minimally invasive pedicle screw placement in lumbar fusion. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 53:184–190

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Glassman SD, Dimar JR, Puno RM, Johnson JR, Shields CB, Linden RD (1995) A prospective analysis of intraoperative electromyographic monitoring of pedicle screw placement with computed tomographic scan confirmation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20:1375–1379

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hu MH, Wu HT, Chang MC, Yu WK, Wang ST, Liu CL (2011) Polymethylmethacrylate augmentation of the pedicle screw: the cement distribution in the vertebral body. Eur Spine J 20:1281–1288

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Isley MR, Zhang XF, Balzer JR, Leppanen RE (2012) Current trends in pedicle screw stimulation techniques: lumbosacral, thoracic, and cervical levels. Neurodiagn J 52:100–175

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Joglekar SB, Mehbod AA (2012) Surgeon’s view of pedicle screw implantation for the monitoring neurophysiologist. J Clin Neurophysiol 29:482–488

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim MC, Chung HT, Cho JL, Kim DJ, Chung NS (2011) Factors affecting the accurate placement of percutaneous pedicle screws during minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J 20:1635–1643

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Lehmann W, Ushmaev A, Ruecker A, Nuechtern J, Grossterlinden L, Begemann PG et al (2008) Comparison of open versus percutaneous pedicle screw insertion in a sheep model. Eur Spine J 17:857–863

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Lubansu A, Rynkowski M, Abeloos L, Appelboom G, Dewitte O (2012) Minimally invasive spinal arthrodesis in osteoporotic population using a cannulated and fenestrated augmented screw: technical description and clinical experience. Minim Invasive Surg. doi:10.1155/2012/507826

  13. Magerl F, Aebi M, Gertzbein SD et al (1994) A comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries. Eur Spine J 3:184–201

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mobbs RJ, Sivabalan P, Li J (2011) Technique, challenges and indications for percutaneous pedicle screw fixation. J Clin Neurosci 18:741–749

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nakashima H, Sato K, Ando T, Inoh H, Nakamura H (2009) Comparison of the percutaneous screw placement precision of isocentric C-arm 3-dimensional fluoroscopy-navigated pedicle screw implantation and conventional fluoroscopy method with minimally invasive surgery. J Spinal Disord Tech 22:468–472

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Oppenheimer JH, DeCastro I, McDonnell DE (2009) Minimally invasive spine technology and minimally invasive spine surgery: a historical review. Neurosurg Focus 27, E9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Payer M (2011) “Minimally invasive” lumbar spine surgery: a critical review. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 153:1455–1459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Samartzis D, Shen FH, Perez-Cruet MJ, Anderson DG (2007) Minimally invasive spine surgery: a historical perspective. Orthop Clin North Am 38:305–326

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schizas C, Michel J, Kosmopoulos V, Theumann N (2007) Computer tomography assessment of pedicle screw insertion in percutaneous posterior transpedicular stabilization. Eur Spine J 16:613–617

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shin BJ, James AR, Njoku IU, Härtl R (2012) Pedicle screw navigation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of perforation risk for computer-navigated versus freehand insertion. J Neurosurg Spine 17:113–122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Smith ZA, Sugimoto K, Lawton CD, Fessler RG (2014) Incidence of lumbar spine pedicle breach after percutaneous screw fixation: a radiographic evaluation of 601 screws in 151 patients. J Spinal Disord Tech. 27(7):358–63. doi:10.1097/BSD.0b013e31826226cb. PubMed PMID:22688617.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Villavicencio AT, Burneikiene S, Bulsara KR, Thramann JJ (2006) Perioperative complications in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus anterior-posterior reconstruction for lumbar disc degeneration and instability. J Spinal Disord Tech 19:92–97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wu RH, Fraser JF, Hartl R (2010) Minimal access versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: meta-analysis of fusion rates. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:2273–2281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zdichavsky M, Blauth M, Knop C, Graessner M, Herrmann H, Krettek C, Bastian L (2004) Accuracy of pedicle screw placement in thoracic spine fractures. Part I: inter- and intra-observer reliability of the scoring system. Eur J Trauma 30:234–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zdichavsky M, Blauth M, Knop C, Lotz J, Krettek C, Bastian L (2004) Accuracy of pedicle screw placement in thoracic spine fractures. Part II: a retrospective analysis of 278 pedicle screws using computed tomographic scans. Eur J Trauma 30:241–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest Statement

The Authors report no declarations of interest. No funds were received in support of this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Domenico Gerardo Iacopino MD, PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Iacopino, D.G. et al. (2017). EMG-Guided Percutaneous Placement of Cement-Augmented Pedicle Screws for Osteoporotic Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures. In: Visocchi, M., Mehdorn, H.M., Katayama, Y., von Wild, K.R.H. (eds) Trends in Reconstructive Neurosurgery. Acta Neurochirurgica Supplement, vol 124. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39546-3_47

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39546-3_47

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-39545-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-39546-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics