Abstract
Studying mathematics teachers in the Political invites to understand how teachers’ subjectivities emerge in the entanglement of the individual in discursive-material formations. We focus on the power effects of the expert discourses by international agencies such as OECD and UNESCO in the fabrication of the mathematics teacher’s subjectivity. Deploying a Foucault-inspired discourse analysis on a series of documents produced by these agencies, we argue that nowadays cultural thesis about who the mathematics teacher should be are framed in a double bind of the teacher as a policy product and as a sales agent. Narratives about the mathematics teacher are made possible within a dispositive of control, which makes mathematics education and mathematics teachers the cornerstone for realizing current market-oriented, competitive, and globalized societies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Angermuller, J. (2014). Poststructuralist discourse analysis. Subjectivity in enunciative pragmatics. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Arribas-Ayllon, M., & Walkerdine, V. (2008). Foucauldian discourse analysis. In C. Willig & W. Stainton-Rogers (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology (pp. 91–108). London: SAGE Publications.
Brown, T., & McNamara, O. (2005). New teacher identity and regulative government: The discursive formation of primary mathematics teacher education. New York: Springer.
Deleuze, G. (1991). Empiricism and subjectivity: An essay on Hume’s theory of human nature. New York: Columbia University Press.
Deleuze, G. (1992a). Postscript on the Societies of Control. October, 59, 3-7. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/778828.
Deleuze, G. (1992b). What is a Dispositif? In T. J. Armstrong (Ed.), Michel Foucault Philosopher, (pp. 159–168). Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Deleuze, G. (1995). Negotiations 1972-1990. New York: Columbia University Press.
Foucault, M. (1972). Archaeology of knowledge. London: Routledge.
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977. New York: Pantheon Books.
Gates, P., & Jorgensen, R. (2009). Foregrounding social justice in mathematics teacher education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(3), 161–170. doi:10.1007/s10857-009-9105-4.
Gellert, U., Hernández, R., & Chapman, O. (2013). Research methods in mathematics teacher education. In M. A. Clements, A. J. Bishop, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), Third international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 327–360). New York: Springer.
Jørgensen, K. M., & Thomassen, A. O. (2015). Maps of organizational learning in regional development projects: Stories, objects and places. Tamara: Journal of Critical Postmodern Organization Science, 13(3), 57–69.
Jørgensen, M., & Phillips, L. J. (2002). Discourse analysis as theory and method. London: SAGE Publications.
Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education [JMTE]. (2014). Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 17(1–6), 1–582.
Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education [JMTE]. (2015). Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 18(1–5), 1–499.
Kanes, C., Morgan, C., & Tsatsaroni, A. (2014). The PISA mathematics regime: Knowledge structures and practices of the self. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 87(2), 145–165. doi:10.1007/s10649-014-9542-6.
Lindblad, S., Pettersson, D., & Popkewitz, T. S. (2015). International comparisons of school results: A systematic review of research on large scale assessments in education. Stockholm: Swedish Research Council.
Luschei, T., & Chudgar, A. (2015). Evolution of policies on teacher deployment to disadvantaged areas. Background paper for EFA Global Monitoring Report 2015.
MacLure, M. (2003). Discourse in educational and social research. Buckingham: Open University.
OECD. (1989). Education and the economy in a changing society. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2005). Teachers matter: Attracting, developing and retaining effective teachers. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2010a). Educating teachers for diversity. Meeting the challenge. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2010b). Improving schools: Strategies for action in Mexico. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2010c). Mathematics Teaching and Learning Strategies in PISA. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2010d). PISA 2012 mathematics framework. Paris: OECD Publications.
OECD. (2012). Equity and quality in education: Supporting disadvantaged students and schools. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2013a). PISA 2012 results: Excellence through equity (volume II): Giving every student the chance to succeed, PISA. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2013b). PISA 2012 results: What makes schools successful (volume IV): Resources, policies and practices, PISA. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2014a). Education at a glance 2014: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2014b). PISA 2012 results in focus. What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2014c). PISA 2012 results: What students know and can do (volume I, revised edition, February 2014): Student performance in mathematics, reading and science, PISA. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2014d). Teacher remuneration in Latvia: An OECD perspective. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2015). Improving schools in Sweden: An OECD perspective. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Pais, A., & Valero, P. (2012). Researching research: Mathematics education in the Political. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(1), 9–24. doi:10.1007/s10649-012-9399-5.
Popkewitz, T. S. (2008). Cosmopolitanism and the age of school reform: Science, education, and making society by making the child. New York: Routledge.
Popkewitz, T. S. (2015). The cultural inscription of numbers: The grey-zone in international comparison of school result research and policy-making. Main lecture prepared for “Education by the Number” Conference. University of Gothenburg. Retrieved June 8–9, 2015.
Schleicher, A. (2011). Building a high-quality teaching profession: Lessons from around the world. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Schleicher, A. (2014). Equity, excellence and inclusiveness in education: Policy lessons from around the world. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Schleicher, A. (Ed.). (2012). Preparing teachers and developing school leaders for the 21st century: Lessons from around the world. Paris: OECD Publishing.
UNESCO. (2007). Education for all by 2015-will we make it? Paris: UNESCO Publishing and Oxford University Press.
UNESCO. (2009). Aportes para la enseñanza de la matemática. Segundo estudio regional comparativo y explicativo. Chile: LLECE.
UNESCO. (2012). Challenges in basic mathematics education. Paris: UNESCO.
UNESCO. (2015). The challenge of teacher shortage and quality: Have we succeeded in getting enough quality teachers into classrooms? Education for All Global Monitoring Report. pp. 1–10.
White, A., Jaworski, B., Agudelo-Valderrama, C., & Gooya, Z. (2013). Teachers learning from teachers. In M. A. Clements, A. J. Bishop, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), Third international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 393–430). New York: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Montecino, A., Valero, P. (2017). Mathematics Teachers as Products and Agents: To Be and Not to Be. That’s the Point!. In: Straehler-Pohl, H., Bohlmann, N., Pais, A. (eds) The Disorder of Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34006-7_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34006-7_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-34005-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-34006-7
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)